Proficiency Based Training to Investigate Blood Sampling Errors Including WBIT
Technology Enhanced Learning and Proficiency Based Progression to Investigate and Mitigate Blood Sampling Errors Including 'Wrong Blood in Tube' in Our Hospitals; Can we Improve Patient Safety and Reduce Resource Wastage?
1 other identifier
interventional
137
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to determine the effectiveness of a Proficiency Based Progression training programme, together with evidence based individual feedback for any residual errors, which has been specifically developed for healthcare professionals performing phlebotomy at Cork University Hospital at reducing blood sampling errors including Wrong Blood in Tube (WBIT). This will allow us to internationally address the universal problem of sample mislabeling and WBIT. A pilot project which consisted of PBP delivered to 46 interns commencing work in July 2017 has shown a 47% reduction in haematology errors and a 67% reduction in WBITs in the haematology department. However, the sample size was small to result in a statistically significant reduction in WBITs and the investigators are concerned that the results were undermined by the fact that SHOs were not using the method outlined by the metric and may have influenced the standard practice of interns. This study by training interns and SHOs will be better able to determine the influence of the training programme in reducing error rates.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 4, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 5, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 4, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2019
CompletedJuly 9, 2019
July 1, 2019
5 months
April 30, 2018
July 8, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Total Number of Rejected Samples due to pre-analytical errors
The total number of blood samples that were not tested due to pre analytical errors by the doctors in training as a percentage of the total number of samples taken by the doctors
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Over and Underfilling of the specimen bottle
6 months
Clotted Samples
6 months
Haemolysed Samples
6 months
No Specimen Received
6 months
Incorrect Bottle
6 months
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Control group A
NO INTERVENTIONControl group A: 1 -year historical data (2016/2017) The blood sampling error rate in the interns receiving proficiency based progression training in 2018 will be compared to historical data on doctors who would have received whatever training they would normally undergo as a part of their existing training program. It will not differ from what they would normally receive at that institution.
Control Group B
ACTIVE COMPARATORControl group B (2017/2018) In a pilot project in July 2017, 46 interns received the phlebotomy proficiency based progression training at CUH. The error rates in the interns in 2017 will be compared to the newly trained interns in 2018 to determine the effectiveness of the training over time. The intervention is the proficiency based progression training programme in phlebotomy.
Interventional Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe blood sampling error rate of doctors in training provided with the intervention i.e. improved proficiency based progression training programme will be analysed from July 10th 2018 until the study ends. The proficiency based progression training will consist of an online eLearning module to teach the doctors the correct process to take blood in the hospital. The doctors will then have to attend a face to face training day on a simulation ward where they will be asked to take blood according to a metric of 77 steps with less than 13 errors and no critical errors. Finally, the doctors will be observed taking blood on the ward and again must take it to a proficient standard.
Interventions
Trainees will receive an online didactic education package and a simulation skill training module. Both of these education and training platforms will be derived from the procedure characterisation and benchmarked on experienced practitioner's performance. Trainees will be required to engage with the education and training platforms in a process of deliberate practice learning until they demonstrate the requisite performance benchmark. Proficiency demonstration will be mandatory before progressing to ward proctored skill supervision on real patients. In addition, the doctors in training will receive ongoing and proximate feedback on their sampling mislabeling.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All blood samples performed at Cork Unversity Hospital and Kerry General Hospital by Doctors in Training
You may not qualify if:
- If the doctor is not using his own log in to request blood samples on the clinical manager software If the doctor does not attend the training session
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Patrick Hennlead
- Cork University Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Cork University Hospital
Cork, Munster, T12 DC4A, Ireland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Anthony Gallagher, PhD
University College Cork
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mary R Cahill, MD
University College Cork
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 30, 2018
First Posted
July 5, 2018
Study Start
July 4, 2018
Primary Completion
December 4, 2018
Study Completion
June 30, 2019
Last Updated
July 9, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- 18 months
- Access Criteria
- At completion of the study
The study data will be made available once the study is completed by contacting the principal investigator