Early Rehabilitation in Critically Ill Children - The PICU Liber8 Study
PICULiber8
1 other identifier
observational
130
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This is a pilot quality improvement implementation study that will measure the impact of a rehabilitation bundle implementation on the outcomes of interest. Advancements in the care provided in Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs) have led to fewer deaths in children. These improvements are unfortunately countered by the emergence of side effects of critical illness, known as PICU-acquired complications (PACs). Delirium, muscle weakness, drug dependency and withdrawal are increasingly common. PACs occur because children are often over-sedated and experience long periods of immobilization. PACs delay recovery, increase disability and worsen long-term function and quality-of-life. Although they are preventable, PACs are very common and frequently overlooked by clinicians. This study aims to "liberate"children from critical illness and improve their recovery and functioning after discharge, through an innovative rehabilitation bundle of 8 complementary steps (PICU Liber8) to reduce sedation, allow children to awaken and breathe comfortably, encourage early mobilization, and engage families in their child's care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jan 2019
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 29, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 3, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2020
CompletedFebruary 24, 2021
February 1, 2021
1.7 years
May 30, 2018
February 23, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Completion rate of daily goals (compliance)
The total number and percentage of daily goals completed from a pre-established daily goals checklist that assess compliance with the bundle. This is considered part of the feasibility outcomes group.
18 months
Performance of the bundle assessed with qualitative (i.e., narrative) description and comparison between groups.
Evaluation of performance as narrative description and comparison between periods of study, about the impact of the bundle on the process of quality of care. This also is part of the feasibility outcomes group.
18 months
Perceptions about barriers and facilitators for implementation of the bundle
Qualitative (i.e., narrative) assessment, description, and comparison of the perceptions from key stakeholders (i.e., family members, patients, clinicians, administrative personnel, nurse team, etc.) between groups about perceived barriers and facilitators for the adequate bundle's implementation. This belongs to the acceptability outcome.
18 months
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Economic analysis
18 months
Incidence of morbidities
18 months
Length of stay
1 month
Ventilator-free days at 30 days
1 month
30-day mortality
18 months
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Pre-implementation cohort
This is the pre-implementation phase where a baseline documentation will take place about usual clinical practice, perceptions and attitudes of PICU staff and clinicians
PICU Liber8 bundle
After the implementation of the bundle (the PICU Liber8 components) same measurements will be captured and analyzed comparatively.
Interventions
Bundle of elements for quality improvement
Eligibility Criteria
All patients admitted to the PICU for the QI intervention. For patient follow-up we will conduct for patients at risk (see eligibility criteria)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- McMaster Universitylead
- London Health Sciences Centrecollaborator
Study Sites (2)
McMaster Children's Hospital
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3Z5, Canada
Children's Hospital London Health Sciences
London, Ontario, Canada
Related Publications (5)
Choong K, Koo KK, Clark H, Chu R, Thabane L, Burns KE, Cook DJ, Herridge MS, Meade MO. Early mobilization in critically ill children: a survey of Canadian practice. Crit Care Med. 2013 Jul;41(7):1745-53. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318287f592.
PMID: 23507722BACKGROUNDCameron S, Ball I, Cepinskas G, Choong K, Doherty TJ, Ellis CG, Martin CM, Mele TS, Sharpe M, Shoemaker JK, Fraser DD. Early mobilization in the critical care unit: A review of adult and pediatric literature. J Crit Care. 2015 Aug;30(4):664-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.03.032. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
PMID: 25987293BACKGROUNDChoong K, Foster G, Fraser DD, Hutchison JS, Joffe AR, Jouvet PA, Menon K, Pullenayegum E, Ward RE; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Acute rehabilitation practices in critically ill children: a multicenter study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014 Jul;15(6):e270-9. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000160.
PMID: 24777303BACKGROUNDWieczorek B, Ascenzi J, Kim Y, Lenker H, Potter C, Shata NJ, Mitchell L, Haut C, Berkowitz I, Pidcock F, Hoch J, Malamed C, Kravitz T, Kudchadkar SR. PICU Up!: Impact of a Quality Improvement Intervention to Promote Early Mobilization in Critically Ill Children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Dec;17(12):e559-e566. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000983.
PMID: 27759596BACKGROUNDChoong K, Fraser D, Al-Harbi S, Borham A, Cameron J, Cameron S, Cheng J, Clark H, Doherty T, Fayed N, Gorter JW, Herridge M, Khetani M, Menon K, Seabrook J, Simpson R, Thabane L. Functional Recovery in Critically Ill Children, the "WeeCover" Multicenter Study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 Feb;19(2):145-154. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001421.
PMID: 29394221BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Karen Choong, MD, MSc
McMaster University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 30, 2018
First Posted
June 29, 2018
Study Start
January 3, 2019
Primary Completion
September 30, 2020
Study Completion
October 30, 2020
Last Updated
February 24, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Data will be available within one month of completing the study.
- Access Criteria
- A Data Access Agreement has been completed and signed among participating centres. Further data access requests will be reviewed by an external independent review panel. Requestors will be required to sign a Data Access Agreement.
De-identified individual participant data will be collected from both participating sites and analyzed at the coordinating centre at McMaster.