Radiographic Changes Following Socket Preservation in Molars Using Bovine Bone Versus Using Beta Tri ca.ph

NCT03573193 | Unknown

• 1 other identifier: socket preservation
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 20
• Locations: 0 countries
• Sites: N/A

Brief Summary

Inadequate ridge width to allow implant placement, it noted that when extraction takes place and ridge preservation is not utilized the site of extraction could lose 40% to 60% of bone height and width within 2 to 3 years and subsequent loss of 0.25% to 0.5% annually. it reported as much as 4 mm loss of ridge width in extraction alone sites within 6 months. Using an atraumatic tooth extraction technique preserves osseous walls thereby improving the chances of osseous graft success. The goal of ridge preservation is minimizing bone loss to preserve the maximum final, healed ridge dimensions. Socket preservation is done using a hard tissue graft like xenograft bone or synthetic bone substitutes and prevent hazard of surgical intervention which needed during implant loading due to bone resorption.

Conditions

Socket Preservation

Keywords

xenograft bone; synthetic bone substitutes

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Prevent post extraction ridge volume loss and decrease bone resorption detected by CBCT to prepare for success implant loading

  socket preservation is minimizing bone loss to preserve the maximum final, healed ridge dimensions

  base lline

Study Arms (2)

study group:

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

ridge preservation alveolar ridge socket preserved using alloplastic material beta tri calcium phosphate type

Other: ridge preservation

control group

OTHER

ridge preservation (alveolar ridge socket preserved using xenograft material Bio-oss type

Other: ridge preservation

Interventions

ridge preservation OTHER

Intra operative procedures (for both groups) ridge preservation * Local anesthesia will be given to the patient. * Scrubbing and draping of the patient will be carried out in a standard fashion for intra oral procedures. * A crestal incision was made, and a mucoperiosteal flap was elevated. Implant osteotomies were prepared according to the recommendations and desired dimensions of implants. * In study group: tooth extraction with ridge preservation using deproteinized bovine bone mineral Bio-Oss * In the comparators group: tooth extraction with ridge preservation using an alloplastic ceramic material beta tricalcium phosphate (TCP).

control group; study group:

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 25 Years - 60 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

• Good oral hygiene.
• Age from 25-60 years
• Both sexes
• Sufficient bone volume
• Presence of non-restorable mandibular molars.

You may not qualify if:

• Extreme bone atrophy.
• Patients who have systemic disorders that might interfere with bone metabolism.
• Pregnant patients.
• Bad oral hygiene.
• Patients with bone diseases.
• Patient with limited mouth opening

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Cairo University: lead

Related Publications (33)

• Gerritsen AE, Allen PF, Witter DJ, Bronkhorst EM, Creugers NH. Tooth loss and oral health-related quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Nov 5;8:126. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-126.

  PMID: 21050499 RESULT

• Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003 Aug;23(4):313-23.

  PMID: 12956475 RESULT

• Van der Weijden F, Dell'Acqua F, Slot DE. Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post-extraction sockets in humans: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2009 Dec;36(12):1048-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01482.x.

  PMID: 19929956 RESULT

• Seibert JS, Salama H. Alveolar ridge preservation and reconstruction. Periodontol 2000. 1996 Jun;11:69-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1996.tb00185.x. No abstract available.

  PMID: 9567959 RESULT

• Osburn RC. Preservation of the alveolar ridge: a simplified technique for retaining teeth beneath removable appliances. J Indiana State Dent Assoc. 1974 Jan-Feb;53(1):8-11. No abstract available.

  PMID: 4523604 RESULT

• Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE. The application of deproteinized bovine bone mineral for ridge preservation prior to implantation. Clinical and histological observations in a case report. J Periodontol. 1998 Sep;69(9):1062-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.1998.69.9.1062.

  PMID: 9776036 RESULT

• Christensen GJ. Ridge preservation: why not? J Am Dent Assoc. 1996 May;127(5):669-70. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0279.

  PMID: 8642146 RESULT

• Darby I, Chen ST, Buser D. Ridge preservation techniques for implant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:260-71.

  PMID: 19885449 RESULT

• Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. J Prosthet Dent. 1972 Feb;27(2):120-32. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(72)90188-6. No abstract available.

  PMID: 4500507 RESULT

• Hammerle CH, Araujo MG, Simion M; Osteology Consensus Group 2011. Evidence-based knowledge on the biology and treatment of extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Feb;23 Suppl 5:80-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02370.x.

  PMID: 22211307 RESULT

• De Buitrago JG, Avila-Ortiz G, Elangovan S. Quality assessment of systematic reviews on alveolar ridge preservation. J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Dec;144(12):1349-57. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0070.

  PMID: 24282264 RESULT

• Omran M, Min S, Abdelhamid A, Liu Y, Zadeh HH. Alveolar ridge dimensional changes following ridge preservation procedure: part-2 - CBCT 3D analysis in non-human primate model. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Jul;27(7):859-66. doi: 10.1111/clr.12701. Epub 2015 Oct 25.

  PMID: 26498407 RESULT

• Barone A, Orlando B, Cingano L, Marconcini S, Derchi G, Covani U. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate and compare implants placed in augmented versus non-augmented extraction sockets: 3-year results. J Periodontol. 2012 Jul;83(7):836-46. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110205. Epub 2011 Dec 5.

  PMID: 22141358 RESULT

• Rasperini G, Canullo L, Dellavia C, Pellegrini G, Simion M. Socket grafting in the posterior maxilla reduces the need for sinus augmentation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010 Jun;30(3):265-73.

  PMID: 20386783 RESULT

• Darby I, Chen S, De Poi R. Ridge preservation: what is it and when should it be considered. Aust Dent J. 2008 Mar;53(1):11-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2007.00008.x.

  PMID: 18304236 RESULT

• Nazirkar G, Singh S, Dole V, Nikam A. Effortless effort in bone regeneration: a review. J Int Oral Health. 2014 Jun;6(3):120-4. Epub 2014 Jun 26.

  PMID: 25083047 RESULT

• Zaner DJ, Yukna RA. Particle size of periodontal bone grafting materials. J Periodontol. 1984 Jul;55(7):406-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.1984.55.7.406.

  PMID: 6086869 RESULT

• Callan DP, Rohrer MD. Use of bovine-derived hydroxyapatite in the treatment of edentulous ridge defects: a human clinical and histologic case report. J Periodontol. 1993 Jun;64(6):575-82. doi: 10.1902/jop.1993.64.6.575.

  PMID: 8393110 RESULT

• Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Felice P, Karatzopoulos G, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;2009(4):CD003607. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003607.pub4.

  PMID: 19821311 RESULT

• Cameron HU, Macnab I, Pilliar RM. Evaluation of biodegradable ceramic. J Biomed Mater Res. 1977 Mar;11(2):179-86. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820110204.

  PMID: 853042 RESULT

• Jarcho M. Biomaterial aspects of calcium phosphates. Properties and applications. Dent Clin North Am. 1986 Jan;30(1):25-47.

  PMID: 3514291 RESULT

• LeGeros RZ. Properties of osteoconductive biomaterials: calcium phosphates. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 Feb;(395):81-98. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200202000-00009.

  PMID: 11937868 RESULT

• Nilsson M, Fernandez E, Sarda S, Lidgren L, Planell JA. Characterization of a novel calcium phosphate/sulphate bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002 Sep 15;61(4):600-7. doi: 10.1002/jbm.10268.

  PMID: 12115450 RESULT

• Artzi Z, Weinreb M, Givol N, Rohrer MD, Nemcovsky CE, Prasad HS, Tal H. Biomaterial resorption rate and healing site morphology of inorganic bovine bone and beta-tricalcium phosphate in the canine: a 24-month longitudinal histologic study and morphometric analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 May-Jun;19(3):357-68.

  PMID: 15214219 RESULT

• Kotani S, Fujita Y, Kitsugi T, Nakamura T, Yamamuro T, Ohtsuki C, Kokubo T. Bone bonding mechanism of beta-tricalcium phosphate. J Biomed Mater Res. 1991 Oct;25(10):1303-15. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820251010.

  PMID: 1812121 RESULT

• Evans RW, Cheung HS, McCarty DJ. Cultured human monocytes and fibroblasts solubilize calcium phosphate crystals. Calcif Tissue Int. 1984 Dec;36(6):645-50. doi: 10.1007/BF02405384.

  PMID: 6442200 RESULT

• Owens JL, Cheung HS, McCarty DJ. Endocytosis precedes dissolution of basic calcium phosphate crystals by murine macrophages. Calcif Tissue Int. 1986 Mar;38(3):170-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02556877.

  PMID: 3085894 RESULT

• Gregoire M, Orly I, Menanteau J. The influence of calcium phosphate biomaterials on human bone cell activities. An in vitro approach. J Biomed Mater Res. 1990 Feb;24(2):165-77. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820240204.

  PMID: 2329113 RESULT

• Gaasbeek RD, Toonen HG, van Heerwaarden RJ, Buma P. Mechanism of bone incorporation of beta-TCP bone substitute in open wedge tibial osteotomy in patients. Biomaterials. 2005 Nov;26(33):6713-9. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.056.

  PMID: 15950278 RESULT

• Fujita R, Yokoyama A, Nodasaka Y, Kohgo T, Kawasaki T. Ultrastructure of ceramic-bone interface using hydroxyapatite and beta-tricalcium phosphate ceramics and replacement mechanism of beta-tricalcium phosphate in bone. Tissue Cell. 2003 Dec;35(6):427-40. doi: 10.1016/s0040-8166(03)00067-3.

  PMID: 14580356 RESULT

• Bowers GM, Vargo JW, Levy B, Emerson JR, Bergquist JJ. Histologic observations following the placement of tricalcium phosphate implants in human intrabony defects. J Periodontol. 1986 May;57(5):286-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.1986.57.5.286.

  PMID: 3457941 RESULT

• Rey C. Calcium phosphate biomaterials and bone mineral. Differences in composition, structures and properties. Biomaterials. 1990 Jul;11:13-5.

  PMID: 2397252 RESULT

• Trisi P, Rao W, Rebaudi A, Fiore P. Histologic effect of pure-phase beta-tricalcium phosphate on bone regeneration in human artificial jawbone defects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003 Feb;23(1):69-77.

  PMID: 12617370 RESULT

Study Officials

• AMR A al azim, professor

  Cairo University

  STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

wahid Y al hussiney, B.D.S

CONTACT

01006881803; waw2sad@yahoo.com

mohammed A abd rassoul, p.h.d

CONTACT

01009612708

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: SINGLE
• Who Masked: PARTICIPANT
• Masking Details: Blinded participants
• Purpose: PREVENTION
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Principal Investigator

Model Details: Randomized clinical trial. • Unicenter, single blinded, with equal randomization, active controlled, parallel group study

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: June 13, 2018
• First Posted: June 29, 2018
• Study Start: July 1, 2018
• Primary Completion: November 1, 2018
• Study Completion: December 1, 2018
• Last Updated: June 29, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-06

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share