The Effect Spinal Bracing System on Gait in Adult Scoliosis Patients
The Effect of Peak Scoliosis Spinal Bracing System on Gait and Pain Level in Adult Scoliosis Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Degenerative adult scoliosis (ADS) results from age related changes leading to segmental instability, deformity and stenosis. Patients with scoliosis demonstrate an altered gait pattern.Furthermore, scoliosis patients exert 30% more physical effort than healthy subjects to ensure habitual locomotion, and this additional effort requires a reciprocal increase of oxygen consumption. Bracing has been found to reduce pain within a short time in ADS patients. A new brace has recently become available, the Peak™ Scoliosis Brace (Aspen Medical Products), designed to alleviate pain in adult patients with chronic pain secondary to scoliosis. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of spinal bracing using Peak™ Scoliosis Brace on pain and lower extremities kinematics of gait.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 15, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 19, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 28, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2019
CompletedAugust 8, 2018
August 1, 2018
12 months
June 19, 2018
August 6, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Kinematic Variables Change assessed with human motion capture system
3-Dimensional Range of Motion (ROM) during the stance and swing phase of the spine, pelvis, hip, knee, ankle, shoulder, and elbow joint angles along with center of mass and head sway and displacement
Baseline; 45 minutes and 2 moths after bracing
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Spatio-Temporal Variables Change assessed with human motion capture system
Baseline; 45 minutes and 2 moths after bracing
Patient Self-Reported Outcome Assessments Change - Visual analog scale (VAS)
Baseline; 45 minutes and 2 moths after bracing
Patient Self-Reported Outcome Assessments Change - Oswestry Disability Index (ODI, version 2.1.a).
Baseline; 45 minutes and 2 moths after bracing
Patient Self-Reported Outcome Assessments Change - Scoliosis Research Society (SRS22)
Baseline; 45 minutes and 2 moths after bracing
Patient Self-Reported Outcome Assessments Change - Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK).
Baseline; 45 minutes and 2 moths after bracing
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Scoliosis Brace
EXPERIMENTALThe Peak Scoliosis Brace designed to alleviate pain in adult patients with chronic pain secondary to scoliosis.
Interventions
Brace will be fitted to each subject by a spine orthopedic surgeon before the testing. The subject will wear the fitted brace for 2 months.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 30- 75 years and older
- Clinically diagnosed thoracolumbar and/or lumbo-sacro-pelvic deformity as defined by the SRS/Schwab classification systems as Cobb angle of 25° or greater
- Able to ambulate without assistance and stand without assistance with their eyes open for a minimum of 10 seconds
- Able and willing to attend and perform the activities described in the informed consent within the boundaries of the timelines set forth for pre-, and post-treatment follow-up
You may not qualify if:
- BMI higher than 35
- Neurological disorder, diabetic neuropathy or other disease that impairs the patient's ability to ambulate or stand without assistance
- Major trauma to the pelvis
- Pregnant or wishing to become pregnant during the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Texas Back Institutelead
- Aspen Medical Productscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Texas Back Institute
Plano, Texas, 75093, United States
Related Publications (28)
Kotwal S, Pumberger M, Hughes A, Girardi F. Degenerative scoliosis: a review. HSS J. 2011 Oct;7(3):257-64. doi: 10.1007/s11420-011-9204-5. Epub 2011 Jun 11.
PMID: 23024623BACKGROUNDKotwicki T, Chowanska J, Kinel E, Czaprowski D, Tomaszewski M, Janusz P. Optimal management of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescence. Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2013 Jul 23;4:59-73. doi: 10.2147/AHMT.S32088. eCollection 2013.
PMID: 24600296BACKGROUNDPloumis A, Transfledt EE, Denis F. Degenerative lumbar scoliosis associated with spinal stenosis. Spine J. 2007 Jul-Aug;7(4):428-36. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.07.015. Epub 2007 Feb 28.
PMID: 17630141BACKGROUNDEngsberg JR, Bridwell KH, Reitenbach AK, Uhrich ML, Baldus C, Blanke K, Lenke LG. Preoperative gait comparisons between adults undergoing long spinal deformity fusion surgery (thoracic to L4, L5, or sacrum) and controls. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Sep 15;26(18):2020-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200109150-00016.
PMID: 11547203BACKGROUNDYang JH, Suh SW, Sung PS, Park WH. Asymmetrical gait in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2013 Nov;22(11):2407-13. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2845-y. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
PMID: 23732766BACKGROUNDMahaudens P, Banse X, Mousny M, Detrembleur C. Gait in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: kinematics and electromyographic analysis. Eur Spine J. 2009 Apr;18(4):512-21. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0899-7. Epub 2009 Feb 18.
PMID: 19224255BACKGROUNDArima H, Yamato Y, Hasegawa T, et al. Gait analysis after corrective surgery for adult spinal deformity - good sagittal balance with improved lumber lordosis is important. Scoliosis 2015;10:O76
BACKGROUNDKramers-de Quervain IA, Muller R, Stacoff A, Grob D, Stussi E. Gait analysis in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2004 Aug;13(5):449-56. doi: 10.1007/s00586-003-0588-x. Epub 2004 Apr 3.
PMID: 15064994BACKGROUNDSchizas CG, Kramers-de Quervain IA, Stussi E, Grob D. Gait asymmetries in patients with idiopathic scoliosis using vertical forces measurement only. Eur Spine J. 1998;7(2):95-8. doi: 10.1007/s005860050037.
PMID: 9629931BACKGROUNDChockalingam N, Dangerfield PH, Rahmatalla A, Ahmed el-N, Cochrane T. Assessment of ground reaction force during scoliotic gait. Eur Spine J. 2004 Dec;13(8):750-4. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0762-9. Epub 2004 Jun 22.
PMID: 15221574BACKGROUNDGiakas G, Baltzopoulos V, Dangerfield PH, Dorgan JC, Dalmira S. Comparison of gait patterns between healthy and scoliotic patients using time and frequency domain analysis of ground reaction forces. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Oct 1;21(19):2235-42. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199610010-00011.
PMID: 8902968BACKGROUNDMahaudens P, Detrembleur C, Mousny M, Banse X. Gait in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: energy cost analysis. Eur Spine J. 2009 Aug;18(8):1160-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1002-0. Epub 2009 Apr 24.
PMID: 19390877BACKGROUNDO'Beirne J, Goldberg C, Dowling FE, Fogarty EE. Equilibrial dysfunction in scoliosis--cause or effect? J Spinal Disord. 1989 Sep;2(3):184-9.
PMID: 2520074BACKGROUNDKuo FC, Wang NH, Hong CZ. Impact of visual and somatosensory deprivation on dynamic balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Nov 1;35(23):2084-90. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cc8108.
PMID: 20975488BACKGROUNDKarimi MT, Kavyani M, Kamali M. Balance and gait performance of scoliotic subjects: A review of the literature. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2016 Aug 10;29(3):403-15. doi: 10.3233/BMR-150641.
PMID: 26519115BACKGROUNDBeaulieu M, Toulotte C, Gatto L, Rivard CH, Teasdale N, Simoneau M, Allard P. Postural imbalance in non-treated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis at different periods of progression. Eur Spine J. 2009 Jan;18(1):38-44. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0831-6. Epub 2008 Dec 6.
PMID: 19066989BACKGROUNDSchimmel JJ, Groen BE, Weerdesteyn V, de Kleuver M. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and spinal fusion do not substantially impact on postural balance. Scoliosis. 2015 Jun 9;10:18. doi: 10.1186/s13013-015-0042-y. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26056528BACKGROUNDGuo X, Chau WW, Hui-Chan CW, Cheung CS, Tsang WW, Cheng JC. Balance control in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis and disturbed somatosensory function. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Jun 15;31(14):E437-40. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000222048.47010.bf.
PMID: 16778672BACKGROUNDSimoneau M, Mercier P, Blouin J, Allard P, Teasdale N. Altered sensory-weighting mechanisms is observed in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. BMC Neurosci. 2006 Oct 19;7:68. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-7-68.
PMID: 17052338BACKGROUNDMarcotte L. SpineCor in the treatment of adult. Scoliosis 2010;5:47.
BACKGROUNDZaina F, Poggio M, Donzelli S, Negrini S. Can bracing help adults with chronic back pain and scoliosis? Short-term results from a pilot study. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018 Aug;42(4):410-414. doi: 10.1177/0309364618757769. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
PMID: 29446692BACKGROUNDGallo D. Case reports: orthotic treatment of adult scoliosis patients with chronic back pain. Scoliosis. 2014 Nov 18;9:18. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-9-18. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 25904972BACKGROUNDSachs D, Capobianco R, Cher D, Holt T, Gundanna M, Graven T, Shamie AN, Cummings J Jr. One-year outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion with a series of triangular implants: a multicenter, patient-level analysis. Med Devices (Auckl). 2014 Aug 28;7:299-304. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S56491. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 25210479BACKGROUNDToosizadeh N, Yen TC, Howe C, Dohm M, Mohler J, Najafi B. Gait behaviors as an objective surgical outcome in low back disorders: A systematic review. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2015 Jul;30(6):528-36. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
PMID: 25921552BACKGROUNDPortney LG, Watkins MP. Foundation of clinical research: applications to practice. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersy: Julie Levin Alexander, 2009.
BACKGROUNDSengupta DK. Re: Schwab F, Ungar B, Blondel B, et al. Scoliosis research society-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification--a validation study. Spine 2012; 37:1077-82. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Sep 15;37(20):1790. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318260d8e4. No abstract available.
PMID: 22976199BACKGROUNDEl Fegoun AB, Schwab F, Gamez L, Champain N, Skalli W, Farcy JP. Center of gravity and radiographic posture analysis: a preliminary review of adult volunteers and adult patients affected by scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jul 1;30(13):1535-40. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000167534.49069.e9.
PMID: 15990669BACKGROUNDVaughan CL, Davis BL, O'Conner JC. Dynamics of Human Gait. 2nd ed. Cape Town, South Africa: Kiboho Publishers, 1999.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ram Haddas, PhD
Texas Back Institute
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 19, 2018
First Posted
June 28, 2018
Study Start
June 15, 2018
Primary Completion
June 1, 2019
Study Completion
September 1, 2019
Last Updated
August 8, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share