NCT03572855

Brief Summary

Degenerative adult scoliosis (ADS) results from age related changes leading to segmental instability, deformity and stenosis. Patients with scoliosis demonstrate an altered gait pattern.Furthermore, scoliosis patients exert 30% more physical effort than healthy subjects to ensure habitual locomotion, and this additional effort requires a reciprocal increase of oxygen consumption. Bracing has been found to reduce pain within a short time in ADS patients. A new brace has recently become available, the Peak™ Scoliosis Brace (Aspen Medical Products), designed to alleviate pain in adult patients with chronic pain secondary to scoliosis. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of spinal bracing using Peak™ Scoliosis Brace on pain and lower extremities kinematics of gait.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 15, 2018

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 19, 2018

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 28, 2018

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2019

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

August 8, 2018

Status Verified

August 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

June 19, 2018

Last Update Submit

August 6, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Kinematic Variables Change assessed with human motion capture system

    3-Dimensional Range of Motion (ROM) during the stance and swing phase of the spine, pelvis, hip, knee, ankle, shoulder, and elbow joint angles along with center of mass and head sway and displacement

    Baseline; 45 minutes and 2 moths after bracing

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Spatio-Temporal Variables Change assessed with human motion capture system

    Baseline; 45 minutes and 2 moths after bracing

  • Patient Self-Reported Outcome Assessments Change - Visual analog scale (VAS)

    Baseline; 45 minutes and 2 moths after bracing

  • Patient Self-Reported Outcome Assessments Change - Oswestry Disability Index (ODI, version 2.1.a).

    Baseline; 45 minutes and 2 moths after bracing

  • Patient Self-Reported Outcome Assessments Change - Scoliosis Research Society (SRS22)

    Baseline; 45 minutes and 2 moths after bracing

  • Patient Self-Reported Outcome Assessments Change - Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK).

    Baseline; 45 minutes and 2 moths after bracing

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Scoliosis Brace

EXPERIMENTAL

The Peak Scoliosis Brace designed to alleviate pain in adult patients with chronic pain secondary to scoliosis.

Combination Product: Scoliosis Brace

Interventions

Scoliosis BraceCOMBINATION_PRODUCT

Brace will be fitted to each subject by a spine orthopedic surgeon before the testing. The subject will wear the fitted brace for 2 months.

Scoliosis Brace

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 30- 75 years and older
  • Clinically diagnosed thoracolumbar and/or lumbo-sacro-pelvic deformity as defined by the SRS/Schwab classification systems as Cobb angle of 25° or greater
  • Able to ambulate without assistance and stand without assistance with their eyes open for a minimum of 10 seconds
  • Able and willing to attend and perform the activities described in the informed consent within the boundaries of the timelines set forth for pre-, and post-treatment follow-up

You may not qualify if:

  • BMI higher than 35
  • Neurological disorder, diabetic neuropathy or other disease that impairs the patient's ability to ambulate or stand without assistance
  • Major trauma to the pelvis
  • Pregnant or wishing to become pregnant during the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Texas Back Institute

Plano, Texas, 75093, United States

Location

Related Publications (28)

  • Kotwal S, Pumberger M, Hughes A, Girardi F. Degenerative scoliosis: a review. HSS J. 2011 Oct;7(3):257-64. doi: 10.1007/s11420-011-9204-5. Epub 2011 Jun 11.

    PMID: 23024623BACKGROUND
  • Kotwicki T, Chowanska J, Kinel E, Czaprowski D, Tomaszewski M, Janusz P. Optimal management of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescence. Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2013 Jul 23;4:59-73. doi: 10.2147/AHMT.S32088. eCollection 2013.

    PMID: 24600296BACKGROUND
  • Ploumis A, Transfledt EE, Denis F. Degenerative lumbar scoliosis associated with spinal stenosis. Spine J. 2007 Jul-Aug;7(4):428-36. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.07.015. Epub 2007 Feb 28.

    PMID: 17630141BACKGROUND
  • Engsberg JR, Bridwell KH, Reitenbach AK, Uhrich ML, Baldus C, Blanke K, Lenke LG. Preoperative gait comparisons between adults undergoing long spinal deformity fusion surgery (thoracic to L4, L5, or sacrum) and controls. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Sep 15;26(18):2020-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200109150-00016.

    PMID: 11547203BACKGROUND
  • Yang JH, Suh SW, Sung PS, Park WH. Asymmetrical gait in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2013 Nov;22(11):2407-13. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2845-y. Epub 2013 Jun 4.

    PMID: 23732766BACKGROUND
  • Mahaudens P, Banse X, Mousny M, Detrembleur C. Gait in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: kinematics and electromyographic analysis. Eur Spine J. 2009 Apr;18(4):512-21. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0899-7. Epub 2009 Feb 18.

    PMID: 19224255BACKGROUND
  • Arima H, Yamato Y, Hasegawa T, et al. Gait analysis after corrective surgery for adult spinal deformity - good sagittal balance with improved lumber lordosis is important. Scoliosis 2015;10:O76

    BACKGROUND
  • Kramers-de Quervain IA, Muller R, Stacoff A, Grob D, Stussi E. Gait analysis in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2004 Aug;13(5):449-56. doi: 10.1007/s00586-003-0588-x. Epub 2004 Apr 3.

    PMID: 15064994BACKGROUND
  • Schizas CG, Kramers-de Quervain IA, Stussi E, Grob D. Gait asymmetries in patients with idiopathic scoliosis using vertical forces measurement only. Eur Spine J. 1998;7(2):95-8. doi: 10.1007/s005860050037.

    PMID: 9629931BACKGROUND
  • Chockalingam N, Dangerfield PH, Rahmatalla A, Ahmed el-N, Cochrane T. Assessment of ground reaction force during scoliotic gait. Eur Spine J. 2004 Dec;13(8):750-4. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0762-9. Epub 2004 Jun 22.

    PMID: 15221574BACKGROUND
  • Giakas G, Baltzopoulos V, Dangerfield PH, Dorgan JC, Dalmira S. Comparison of gait patterns between healthy and scoliotic patients using time and frequency domain analysis of ground reaction forces. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Oct 1;21(19):2235-42. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199610010-00011.

    PMID: 8902968BACKGROUND
  • Mahaudens P, Detrembleur C, Mousny M, Banse X. Gait in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: energy cost analysis. Eur Spine J. 2009 Aug;18(8):1160-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1002-0. Epub 2009 Apr 24.

    PMID: 19390877BACKGROUND
  • O'Beirne J, Goldberg C, Dowling FE, Fogarty EE. Equilibrial dysfunction in scoliosis--cause or effect? J Spinal Disord. 1989 Sep;2(3):184-9.

    PMID: 2520074BACKGROUND
  • Kuo FC, Wang NH, Hong CZ. Impact of visual and somatosensory deprivation on dynamic balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Nov 1;35(23):2084-90. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cc8108.

    PMID: 20975488BACKGROUND
  • Karimi MT, Kavyani M, Kamali M. Balance and gait performance of scoliotic subjects: A review of the literature. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2016 Aug 10;29(3):403-15. doi: 10.3233/BMR-150641.

    PMID: 26519115BACKGROUND
  • Beaulieu M, Toulotte C, Gatto L, Rivard CH, Teasdale N, Simoneau M, Allard P. Postural imbalance in non-treated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis at different periods of progression. Eur Spine J. 2009 Jan;18(1):38-44. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0831-6. Epub 2008 Dec 6.

    PMID: 19066989BACKGROUND
  • Schimmel JJ, Groen BE, Weerdesteyn V, de Kleuver M. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and spinal fusion do not substantially impact on postural balance. Scoliosis. 2015 Jun 9;10:18. doi: 10.1186/s13013-015-0042-y. eCollection 2015.

    PMID: 26056528BACKGROUND
  • Guo X, Chau WW, Hui-Chan CW, Cheung CS, Tsang WW, Cheng JC. Balance control in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis and disturbed somatosensory function. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Jun 15;31(14):E437-40. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000222048.47010.bf.

    PMID: 16778672BACKGROUND
  • Simoneau M, Mercier P, Blouin J, Allard P, Teasdale N. Altered sensory-weighting mechanisms is observed in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. BMC Neurosci. 2006 Oct 19;7:68. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-7-68.

    PMID: 17052338BACKGROUND
  • Marcotte L. SpineCor in the treatment of adult. Scoliosis 2010;5:47.

    BACKGROUND
  • Zaina F, Poggio M, Donzelli S, Negrini S. Can bracing help adults with chronic back pain and scoliosis? Short-term results from a pilot study. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018 Aug;42(4):410-414. doi: 10.1177/0309364618757769. Epub 2018 Feb 15.

    PMID: 29446692BACKGROUND
  • Gallo D. Case reports: orthotic treatment of adult scoliosis patients with chronic back pain. Scoliosis. 2014 Nov 18;9:18. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-9-18. eCollection 2014.

    PMID: 25904972BACKGROUND
  • Sachs D, Capobianco R, Cher D, Holt T, Gundanna M, Graven T, Shamie AN, Cummings J Jr. One-year outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion with a series of triangular implants: a multicenter, patient-level analysis. Med Devices (Auckl). 2014 Aug 28;7:299-304. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S56491. eCollection 2014.

    PMID: 25210479BACKGROUND
  • Toosizadeh N, Yen TC, Howe C, Dohm M, Mohler J, Najafi B. Gait behaviors as an objective surgical outcome in low back disorders: A systematic review. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2015 Jul;30(6):528-36. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 Apr 17.

    PMID: 25921552BACKGROUND
  • Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundation of clinical research: applications to practice. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersy: Julie Levin Alexander, 2009.

    BACKGROUND
  • Sengupta DK. Re: Schwab F, Ungar B, Blondel B, et al. Scoliosis research society-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification--a validation study. Spine 2012; 37:1077-82. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Sep 15;37(20):1790. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318260d8e4. No abstract available.

    PMID: 22976199BACKGROUND
  • El Fegoun AB, Schwab F, Gamez L, Champain N, Skalli W, Farcy JP. Center of gravity and radiographic posture analysis: a preliminary review of adult volunteers and adult patients affected by scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jul 1;30(13):1535-40. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000167534.49069.e9.

    PMID: 15990669BACKGROUND
  • Vaughan CL, Davis BL, O'Conner JC. Dynamics of Human Gait. 2nd ed. Cape Town, South Africa: Kiboho Publishers, 1999.

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Scoliosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal CurvaturesSpinal DiseasesBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal Diseases

Study Officials

  • Ram Haddas, PhD

    Texas Back Institute

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 19, 2018

First Posted

June 28, 2018

Study Start

June 15, 2018

Primary Completion

June 1, 2019

Study Completion

September 1, 2019

Last Updated

August 8, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations