Clinical Assessment of a Motorized Spinal Distraction Rod in the Severe to Early Scoliosis Child
ASTS
1 other identifier
interventional
5
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this biomedical research is to evaluate the feasibility of the treatment with the new spinal distraction device ASTS in patients aged 4 to 10 years with severe early onset scoliosis. The hypothesis of this project is that the new fully implantable motorized spinal distraction device may provide a correction of scoliosis and progressive elongation ensuring patient comfort and minimizing complications. The ASTS (for Active Scoliosis Treatment System) growing rod is a new fully implantable motorized spinal distraction device which can ensure a correction of scoliosis and progressive elongation ensuring patient comfort and minimizing complications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 11, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 6, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 5, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedSeptember 8, 2025
September 1, 2025
6.8 years
July 11, 2016
September 1, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Ability to Implant the device
The surgeon will have to say if the implantation of the device has been done or not
Day 0: the day of the implantation
Change of the position of the implant
1 year after the implantation of the device, radiographs will be realised to ensure that the implant is still well positioning
1 years after the implantation
Change of the position of the implant
2 years after the implantation of the device, radiographs will be realised to ensure that the implant is still weel positioning
2 years after the implantation
Change of the position of the implant
3 years after the implantation of the device, radiographs will be realised to ensure that the implant is still weel positioning
3 years after the implantation
Change of the implant's length
The elongation of the implant will be measured in mm on the digital radiography
3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years after the implantation
Secondary Outcomes (26)
Post-surgical pain
3 months, after the implantation
Post-surgical pain
months after the implantation
Post-surgical pain
9 months after the implantation
Post-surgical pain
1 year after the implantation
Survey to evaluate the quality of life
Day 0
- +21 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
ASTS device
EXPERIMENTALImplantation of device ASTS (for ACTIVE TREATMENT SCOLIOSIS SYSTEM ) in children between 4 and 10
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient 4 to 10 years
- Patient weight between 15kg at 50kg
- Introducing severe scoliosis (Cobb angle\> 40 °) with early onset
- Failed or cons-indication of conservative treatment (cast or brace)
- Agreement of parents or legal guardian (written agreement) and the patient (at least an oral agreement).
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindication to surgery
- Age less than 4 years or above 10 years
- Weight less 15kg and above 50 kg
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHU de Toulouse
Toulouse, 31000, France
Related Publications (12)
Noordeen HM, Shah SA, Elsebaie HB, Garrido E, Farooq N, Al-Mukhtar M. In vivo distraction force and length measurements of growing rods: which factors influence the ability to lengthen? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Dec 15;36(26):2299-303. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821b8e16.
PMID: 21494191BACKGROUNDVarni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care. 2001 Aug;39(8):800-12. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200108000-00006.
PMID: 11468499BACKGROUNDVarni JW, Burwinkle TM, Seid M, Skarr D. The PedsQL 4.0 as a pediatric population health measure: feasibility, reliability, and validity. Ambul Pediatr. 2003 Nov-Dec;3(6):329-41. doi: 10.1367/1539-4409(2003)0032.0.co;2.
PMID: 14616041BACKGROUNDAkbarnia BA, Marks DS, Boachie-Adjei O, Thompson AG, Asher MA. Dual growing rod technique for the treatment of progressive early-onset scoliosis: a multicenter study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Sep 1;30(17 Suppl):S46-57. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000175190.08134.73.
PMID: 16138066BACKGROUNDBess S, Akbarnia BA, Thompson GH, Sponseller PD, Shah SA, El Sebaie H, Boachie-Adjei O, Karlin LI, Canale S, Poe-Kochert C, Skaggs DL. Complications of growing-rod treatment for early-onset scoliosis: analysis of one hundred and forty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Nov 3;92(15):2533-43. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01471. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
PMID: 20889912BACKGROUNDLucas G, Bollini G, Jouve JL, de Gauzy JS, Accadbled F, Lascombes P, Journeau P, Karger C, Mallet JF, Neagoe P, Cottalorda J, De Billy B, Langlais J, Herbaux B, Fron D, Violas P. Complications in pediatric spine surgery using the vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib: the French experience. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Dec 1;38(25):E1589-99. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000014.
PMID: 24048087BACKGROUNDKrieg AH, Speth BM, Foster BK. Leg lengthening with a motorized nail in adolescents : an alternative to external fixators? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Jan;466(1):189-97. doi: 10.1007/s11999-007-0040-3. Epub 2008 Jan 3.
PMID: 18196392BACKGROUNDBaumgart R. The reverse planning method for lengthening of the lower limb using a straight intramedullary nail with or without deformity correction. A new method. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2009 Jun;21(2):221-33. doi: 10.1007/s00064-009-1709-4.
PMID: 19685230BACKGROUNDden Uil CA, Bezemer R, Miranda DR, Ince C, Lagrand WK, Hartman M, Bogers AJ, Spronk PE, Simoons ML. Intra-operative assessment of human pulmonary alveoli in vivo using Sidestream Dark Field imaging: a feasibility study. Med Sci Monit. 2009 Oct;15(10):MT137-141.
PMID: 19789519BACKGROUNDKanter KR, Haggerty CM, Restrepo M, de Zelicourt DA, Rossignac J, Parks WJ, Yoganathan AP. Preliminary clinical experience with a bifurcated Y-graft Fontan procedure--a feasibility study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Aug;144(2):383-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.05.015. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
PMID: 22698555BACKGROUNDKerimaa P, Ojala R, Sinikumpu JJ, Hyvonen P, Korhonen J, Markkanen P, Tervonen O, Sequeiros RB. MRI-guided percutaneous retrograde drilling of osteochondritis dissecans of the talus: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol. 2014 Jul;24(7):1572-6. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3161-6. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
PMID: 24740345BACKGROUNDFlynn JM, Emans JB, Smith JT, Betz RR, Deeney VF, Patel NM, Campbell RM. VEPTR to treat nonsyndromic congenital scoliosis: a multicenter, mid-term follow-up study. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013 Oct-Nov;33(7):679-84. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e31829d55a2.
PMID: 23812154BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Franck Accadbled, MD PhD
University Hospital, Toulouse
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 11, 2016
First Posted
November 6, 2017
Study Start
February 5, 2019
Primary Completion
December 1, 2025
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
September 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share