Endemic Mycoses Treatment With SUBA-itraconazole vs Itraconazole
MSG15
SUBA-itraconazole Versus Conventional Itraconazole in the Treatment of Endemic Mycoses: a Multi-center, Open-label Comparative Trial
3 other identifiers
interventional
88
2 countries
12
Brief Summary
This is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, open-label parallel arm study involving patients with proven or probable invasive endemic fungal infection to ascertain the pharmacokinetics, safety, efficacy, tolerability and health economics of oral SUBA-itraconazole compared to conventional itraconazole. Patients will receive randomized open-label study drug (SUBA-itraconazole or conventional itraconazole) over a 42 day period and then continue therapy until Day 180. Patients will be stratified based on clinically reported infection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Sep 2018
Typical duration for phase_2
12 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 28, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 17, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 29, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 6, 2022
CompletedJuly 7, 2023
September 1, 2022
2.7 years
February 1, 2018
June 2, 2022
June 21, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Comparison of Plasma Itraconazole Levels and Hydroxyitraconazole Levels at Day 14
Percentage of participants to achieve therapeutic itraconazole and hydroxyitraconazole levels by evaluating Inter-patient variability as calculated by co-efficient of variation on plasma specimens collected on Day 14
Day 14
Frequency of Treatment Related Adverse Events Days 1-42
Comparison of the number of treatment related adverse events in each arm occurring Days 1-42.
Day 42
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Comparison of Plasma Itraconazole Levels and Hydroxyitraconazole Levels at Day 42
Day 42
Resolution of Signs and Symptoms of Invasive Fungal Infection on Day 42
Day 42
The Number of Days of Hospitalization at Day 180
Day 180
Study Arms (2)
SUBA itraconazole
EXPERIMENTALStage 1: Day 1-3 two 65 mg capsules three times daily with food. Days 4-42 two 65 mg capsules twice daily with food. Stage 2 : Days 43-180 two 65 mg capsules twice daily with food
Conventional itraconazole
ACTIVE COMPARATORStage 1: Day 1-3 two 100 mg capsules three times daily with food. Days 4-42 two 100 mg capsules twice daily with food. Stage 2 : Days 43-180 two 100 mg capsules twice daily with food
Interventions
SUBA itraconazole study drug will consist of two 65 mg capsules to be taken three times a day with food for days 1-3 of study. For days 4-180 of study, two 65mg capsules will be taken twice daily with food.
Conventional itraconazole comparator drug will consist of two 100 mg capsules to be taken three times a day with food for days 1-3 of study. For days 4-180 of study, two 100 mg capsules will be taken twice daily with food.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female patients age \> 18 years who have given written informed consent to participate
- Patients with a proven or probable endemic mycosis (Histoplasma, Coccidioides, Paracoccidioides, Blastomyces, Sporothrix, Talaromyces marneffei (formerly Penicillium marneffei) according to current EORTC/MSG (Mycoses Study Group) criteria, including patients who:
- Are immunosuppressed, including as a result of HIV/AIDS
- Have had a heart, lung or bone marrow transplant
- Have had chemotherapy for cancer
- Are otherwise normal hosts
You may not qualify if:
- Significant liver dysfunction as evidenced by at least 5 times greater than upper limits of normal baseline ALT (alanine aminotransferase) , AST (aspartate aminotransferase), alkaline phosphatase, or total bilirubin.
- Use of an alternative antifungal therapy (IV or oral) for more than 14 days for this infection, with the exception of Coccidioidomycosis. Subjects with Coccidioidomycosis who previously received fluconazole therapy for more than 14 days may be included, if in the opinion of the investigator, they are having an inadequate response or, are intolerant of fluconazole (e.g. due to adverse events). Such subjects must washout from fluconazole for 7 days (\~5 half-lives of fluconazole) before starting investigational therapy.
- Evidence of CNS (central nervous system) infection.
- Unable to take PO medications.
- Female patients who are lactating or pregnant.
- Women should be:
- Postmenopausal for 1 year,
- Post-hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy,
- If of child bearing potential have a negative β-HCG (human chorionic gonadotropin) at screening and using highly effective method of birth control throughout course of study or remain abstinent for duration of study.
- Documented intolerance, allergy or hypersensitivity to an azole.
- Inability to comply with study treatment, study visits, and study procedures.
- Known history of congestive cardiac failure on medical treatment, fungal endocarditis, or other causes of ventricular dysfunction that may outweigh the benefit of itraconazole.
- Patients with active TB (tuberculosis)
- Concurrent use of astemizole, rifampin/rifampicin, rifabutin, ergot alkaloids, long acting barbiturates, carbamazepine, pimozide, quinidine, neostigmine, terfenadine, ketoconazole, valproic acid, or St. John's wort in the 5 days prior to first administration of study drug.
- Any known or suspected condition of the patient that may jeopardize adherence to the protocol requirements or impede the accurate measurement of efficacy.
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Alabama at Birminghamlead
- University of California, Daviscollaborator
- Washington University School of Medicinecollaborator
Study Sites (12)
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States
University of Arizona
Tucson, Arizona, 85724, United States
University of California at Davis
Sacramento, California, 95817, United States
Rush University
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States
Metro Infectious Disease Associates
Overland Park, Kansas, 66211, United States
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
Unniversity of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States
Washington University in St. Louis
St Louis, Missouri, 63130, United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710-1000, United States
University of Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin, 53705, United States
Hospital Santo Tomás
Panama City, Panama
Related Publications (2)
Spec A, Thompson GR, Miceli MH, Hayes J, Proia L, McKinsey D, Arauz AB, Mullane K, Young JA, McGwin G, McMullen R, Plumley T, Moore MK, McDowell LA, Jones C, Pappas PG. MSG-15: Super-Bioavailability Itraconazole Versus Conventional Itraconazole in the Treatment of Endemic Mycoses-A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Comparative Trial. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Jan 29;11(3):ofae010. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae010. eCollection 2024 Mar.
PMID: 38440302DERIVEDThompson GR 3rd, Lewis P, Mudge S, Patterson TF, Burnett BP. Open-Label Crossover Oral Bioequivalence Pharmacokinetics Comparison for a 3-Day Loading Dose Regimen and 15-Day Steady-State Administration of SUBA-Itraconazole and Conventional Itraconazole Capsules in Healthy Adults. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Jul 22;64(8):e00400-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00400-20. Print 2020 Jul 22.
PMID: 32457106DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Peter G. Pappas
- Organization
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Peter G Pappas, MD
University of Alabama at Birmingham
- STUDY CHAIR
George R Thompson, MD
University of California, Davis
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrej Spec, MD
Washington University School of Medicine
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 1, 2018
First Posted
June 28, 2018
Study Start
September 17, 2018
Primary Completion
May 31, 2021
Study Completion
April 29, 2022
Last Updated
July 7, 2023
Results First Posted
October 6, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-09