NCT03567967

Brief Summary

We aim to examine whether a purchasing incentive for healthy foods has the same effect on dietary intake in a community with and a community without a purchasing penalty for unhealthy foods. We will perform a randomized non-inferiority trial in two locations, San Francisco (SF) and Los Angeles (LA) to test whether a voucher for purchasing fresh fruits and vegetables has a similar effect in LA and in SF, where the former does not but the latter does have a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages. Participants will be recruited from 4 neighborhoods (N=312) with 2 SF neighborhoods (exposed to the SSB tax) and 2 LA neighborhoods (not exposed to the SSB tax).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
313

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable cardiovascular-diseases

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 31, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 31, 2018

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 26, 2018

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 9, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 9, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

July 17, 2020

Status Verified

July 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

May 31, 2018

Last Update Submit

July 15, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

nutritionfruits and vegetablessugar-sweetened beverages

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in fruit and vegetable consumption

    Change in fruit and vegetable consumption from baseline (BL), i.e., before voucher receipt, to the end of the intervention at the end of month 6 (M6), i.e., during the final month of voucher receipt, measured by two 24-hour recalls at each data collection point (BL and M6).

    Month 0 to Month 6

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Change in nutrition quality per HEI score

    Month 0 to Month 6

  • Change in nutrition quality per AHEI score

    Month 0 to Month 6

  • Change in SSB consumption

    Month 0 to Month 6

  • Change in overall caloric intake

    Month 0 to Month 6

  • Overall percentage of vouchers redeemed

    Month 0 to Month 6

Study Arms (2)

San Francisco

EXPERIMENTAL

Each study participant will receive four paper vouchers per month for a total of six months. Each of these vouchers can be redeemed for fresh or frozen fruits and vegetables at a number of specified local corner stores, supermarkets, or farmer's markets. The San Francisco participants will receive and spend these vouchers in an environment which has implemented a sugar-sweetened beverage tax.

Behavioral: Fruit and vegetable voucher

Los Angeles

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Each study participant will receive four paper vouchers per month for a total of six months. Each of these vouchers can be redeemed for fresh or frozen fruits and vegetables at a number of specified local corner stores, supermarkets, or farmer's markets. The Los Angeles participants will receive and spend these vouchers in an environment which has NOT implemented a sugar-sweetened beverage tax.

Behavioral: Fruit and vegetable voucher

Interventions

Participants will receive four vouchers, each dated for a month, to be used on fruits and vegetables at specified local corner stores, supermarkets, and farmer's markets for a duration of six months. Each study participant will have the same intervention, as this is a non-inferiority trial to compare voucher use in LA and test whether the nutritional effects of that use are non-inferior to use in SF.

Also known as: Voucher
Los AngelesSan Francisco

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Understand English sufficiently to provide informed consent;
  • Provision of signed and dated informed consent form;
  • Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study;
  • Any gender, aged 21 years or older;
  • Have self-reported income ≤250% of the federal poverty level;
  • Have regular access to a mobile phone;
  • Have a safe and secure mailing address at which to receive vouchers;
  • Be a resident of the Counties of San Francisco or Los Angeles as defined by official municipal boundaries.

You may not qualify if:

  • Currently participating in any other dietary or nutrition study that would impact his or her normal eating patterns;
  • Currently be enrolled in and receiving EatSF, CHIVES, or Vouchers4Veggies vouchers;
  • Has active diagnosis of cancer or congestive heart failure;
  • Is planning to move out of San Francisco or Los Angeles in the next 12 months;
  • Currently pregnant.
  • Currently live with and share a food budget with a current Vouchers4Veggies, EVIDENCE, or CHIVES study participant.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

University of California

San Francisco, California, 94158, United States

Location

Stanford University

Stanford, California, 94305, United States

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cardiovascular Diseases

Interventions

Fruit

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

FoodDiet, Food, and NutritionPhysiological PhenomenaFood and Beverages

Study Officials

  • Sanjay Basu, MD, PhD

    Assistant Professor of Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Dean Schillinger, MD

    University of California, San Francisco

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
24-hour dietary recalls are conducted by blinded registered dietitians
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor of Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2018

First Posted

June 26, 2018

Study Start

May 31, 2018

Primary Completion

September 9, 2019

Study Completion

September 9, 2019

Last Updated

July 17, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations