Fruit and Vegetable Vouchers With and Without an SSB Tax
EVIDENCE
The EValuating Interventions in Diabetogenic Environments Through Natural Controlled Experiments (EVIDENCE) Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
313
1 country
2
Brief Summary
We aim to examine whether a purchasing incentive for healthy foods has the same effect on dietary intake in a community with and a community without a purchasing penalty for unhealthy foods. We will perform a randomized non-inferiority trial in two locations, San Francisco (SF) and Los Angeles (LA) to test whether a voucher for purchasing fresh fruits and vegetables has a similar effect in LA and in SF, where the former does not but the latter does have a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages. Participants will be recruited from 4 neighborhoods (N=312) with 2 SF neighborhoods (exposed to the SSB tax) and 2 LA neighborhoods (not exposed to the SSB tax).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable cardiovascular-diseases
Started May 2018
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 31, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 31, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 26, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 9, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 9, 2019
CompletedJuly 17, 2020
July 1, 2020
1.3 years
May 31, 2018
July 15, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in fruit and vegetable consumption
Change in fruit and vegetable consumption from baseline (BL), i.e., before voucher receipt, to the end of the intervention at the end of month 6 (M6), i.e., during the final month of voucher receipt, measured by two 24-hour recalls at each data collection point (BL and M6).
Month 0 to Month 6
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change in nutrition quality per HEI score
Month 0 to Month 6
Change in nutrition quality per AHEI score
Month 0 to Month 6
Change in SSB consumption
Month 0 to Month 6
Change in overall caloric intake
Month 0 to Month 6
Overall percentage of vouchers redeemed
Month 0 to Month 6
Study Arms (2)
San Francisco
EXPERIMENTALEach study participant will receive four paper vouchers per month for a total of six months. Each of these vouchers can be redeemed for fresh or frozen fruits and vegetables at a number of specified local corner stores, supermarkets, or farmer's markets. The San Francisco participants will receive and spend these vouchers in an environment which has implemented a sugar-sweetened beverage tax.
Los Angeles
ACTIVE COMPARATOREach study participant will receive four paper vouchers per month for a total of six months. Each of these vouchers can be redeemed for fresh or frozen fruits and vegetables at a number of specified local corner stores, supermarkets, or farmer's markets. The Los Angeles participants will receive and spend these vouchers in an environment which has NOT implemented a sugar-sweetened beverage tax.
Interventions
Participants will receive four vouchers, each dated for a month, to be used on fruits and vegetables at specified local corner stores, supermarkets, and farmer's markets for a duration of six months. Each study participant will have the same intervention, as this is a non-inferiority trial to compare voucher use in LA and test whether the nutritional effects of that use are non-inferior to use in SF.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Understand English sufficiently to provide informed consent;
- Provision of signed and dated informed consent form;
- Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study;
- Any gender, aged 21 years or older;
- Have self-reported income ≤250% of the federal poverty level;
- Have regular access to a mobile phone;
- Have a safe and secure mailing address at which to receive vouchers;
- Be a resident of the Counties of San Francisco or Los Angeles as defined by official municipal boundaries.
You may not qualify if:
- Currently participating in any other dietary or nutrition study that would impact his or her normal eating patterns;
- Currently be enrolled in and receiving EatSF, CHIVES, or Vouchers4Veggies vouchers;
- Has active diagnosis of cancer or congestive heart failure;
- Is planning to move out of San Francisco or Los Angeles in the next 12 months;
- Currently pregnant.
- Currently live with and share a food budget with a current Vouchers4Veggies, EVIDENCE, or CHIVES study participant.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Stanford Universitylead
- University of California, San Franciscocollaborator
Study Sites (2)
University of California
San Francisco, California, 94158, United States
Stanford University
Stanford, California, 94305, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sanjay Basu, MD, PhD
Assistant Professor of Medicine
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dean Schillinger, MD
University of California, San Francisco
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- 24-hour dietary recalls are conducted by blinded registered dietitians
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 31, 2018
First Posted
June 26, 2018
Study Start
May 31, 2018
Primary Completion
September 9, 2019
Study Completion
September 9, 2019
Last Updated
July 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share