Transfer of Technological Innovations to Nursing Practice: A Contribution to the Prevention of Infections
TecPrevInf
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The insertion of peripheral vascular catheters (PVCs) is the most often invasive procedure performed in hospital settings. During hospitalization, the majority of patients need to have a PVC inserted. These devices are not risk-free, affecting patients' safety and well-being. In clinical settings, health professionals must deal with difficult venous accesses due to the patient's age, physical characteristics, clinical status, and medication, which hinder the PVC insertion. When veins are not visible or palpable, this may lead to successive puncture attempts, causing pain to the patient and discomfort to the nurse, which results in increased costs. Guidelines state that puncture should be attempted only twice per professional, to a maximum of four attempts; against this recommendation and due to the patient's therapeutic needs and clinical situation, health professionals attempt to puncture multiple times in a single scenario. In this regard, health professionals should consider using specific technologies that help to select the vein and reduce the number of puncture attempts and catheter-related mechanical complications. Taking into account the multiplicity of existing technologies in the international market that assist health professionals in peripheral venous catheterization, ultrasound and infrared devices emerge in the literature as two of the most commonly used during this procedure. These technologies were developed with the purpose of improving peripheral intravenous catheterization success rate and thus reducing the number and extent of the negative effects of multiple or unsuccessful attempts, with the additional purpose of avoiding the frustrations of health professionals in these scenarios. However, such technologies are still underused in clinical practice, since health professionals are not familiar with the use of these devices. Moreover, the costs associated with their purchase and maintenance may be considered as excessive in relation to the traditional method. The project investigators aim to determine whether the use of either ultrasound or near-infrared vascular imaging will significantly improve the success rate of peripheral intravenous catheterization in adults on first attempt by nurses compared with the standard approach, reduce immediate related complications and improve patient and provider satisfaction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 9, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 20, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2019
CompletedFebruary 8, 2021
February 1, 2021
1.2 years
May 9, 2018
February 5, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Successful intravenous catheterization on the first attempt
Successful attempt is defined through the clear flush of the catheter with 5 mL of normal saline without extravasation.
This outcome will be assessed immediately following intervention, an average of 20 minutes. This outcome will be assessed through study completion, an average of 6 months., assessed up to 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Number of attempts to successful intravenous catheter placement
Immediately following intervention, an average of 5 minutes. This outcome will be assessed through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Time to successful placement (in minutes)
From time of randomization until the time of successful intravenous catheter placement, assessed through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Patient satisfaction
This outcome will be assessed immediately following intervention, an average of 20 minutes. This outcome will be assessed through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Nurse satisfaction
This outcome will be assessed immediately following intervention, an average of 20 minutes. This outcome will be assessed through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Immediate Complications
This outcome will be assessed immediately following intervention, an average of 20 minutes. This outcome will be assessed through study completion, an average of 6 months.
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Ultrasound imaging
EXPERIMENTALUltrasonography offers visual information about the size and depth of blood vessels, potentially facilitating intravenous placement of the needle in real time.
Near-infrared imaging
EXPERIMENTALNear-infrared imaging devices project near-infrared light onto the skin, which is absorbed by deoxygenated hemoglobin. The invisible image of the underlying vascular pattern is captured by the device, processed and projected, in real time, back onto the patient's skin using visible green light. This technology allows hands-free visualization of a vascular map to guide catheter placement.
Interventions
Ultrasound allows viewing veins and surrounding anatomical structures, making it easier to perform the placement of a cannula into a peripherally located vein in real time. This process allows the cannulation of veins that are unable to be visualised or palpated.
Infrared technologies allows illuminating the vein with a near-infrared light, which is absorbed by blood and reflected by adjacent tissue.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants who require peripheral intravenous catheterization as part of routine care;
- Participants whose primary nurse agrees to participate in the study;
- Participants who are able to give written assent or oral assent.
You may not qualify if:
- Confused and/or disoriented participants;
- Participants who are unable to communicate orally and/or in writing.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra
Coimbra, 3000-075, Portugal
Related Publications (9)
Marsh N, Webster J, Mihala G, Rickard CM. Devices and dressings to secure peripheral venous catheters to prevent complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 12;2015(6):CD011070. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011070.pub2.
PMID: 26068958BACKGROUNDGrune F, Schrappe M, Basten J, Wenchel HM, Tual E, Stutzer H; Cologne Quality Control Network. Phlebitis rate and time kinetics of short peripheral intravenous catheters. Infection. 2004 Feb;32(1):30-2. doi: 10.1007/s15010-004-1037-4.
PMID: 15007740BACKGROUNDPujol M, Hornero A, Saballs M, Argerich MJ, Verdaguer R, Cisnal M, Pena C, Ariza J, Gudiol F. Clinical epidemiology and outcomes of peripheral venous catheter-related bloodstream infections at a university-affiliated hospital. J Hosp Infect. 2007 Sep;67(1):22-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2007.06.017. Epub 2007 Aug 27.
PMID: 17719678BACKGROUNDAbolfotouh MA, Salam M, Bani-Mustafa A, White D, Balkhy HH. Prospective study of incidence and predictors of peripheral intravenous catheter-induced complications. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2014 Dec 8;10:993-1001. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S74685. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 25525365BACKGROUNDCicolini G, Manzoli L, Simonetti V, Flacco ME, Comparcini D, Capasso L, Di Baldassarre A, Eltaji Elfarouki G. Phlebitis risk varies by peripheral venous catheter site and increases after 96 hours: a large multi-centre prospective study. J Adv Nurs. 2014 Nov;70(11):2539-49. doi: 10.1111/jan.12403. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
PMID: 24684163BACKGROUNDDorniak-Wall T, Rudaks L, Solanki NS, Greenwood J. Safe and correct use of peripheral intravenous devices. ANZ J Surg. 2013 Oct;83(10):764-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06281.x. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
PMID: 23035825BACKGROUNDIsmailoglu EG, Zaybak A, Akarca FK, Kiyan S. The effect of the use of ultrasound in the success of peripheral venous catheterisation. Int Emerg Nurs. 2015 Apr;23(2):89-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2014.07.010. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
PMID: 25175514BACKGROUNDPartovi-Deilami K, Nielsen JK, Moller AM, Nesheim SS, Jorgensen VL. Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Placement of Difficult-to-Place Peripheral Venous Catheters: A Prospective Study of a Training Program for Nurse Anesthetists. AANA J. 2016 Apr;84(2):86-92.
PMID: 27311149BACKGROUNDPark JM, Kim MJ, Yim HW, Lee WC, Jeong H, Kim NJ. Utility of near-infrared light devices for pediatric peripheral intravenous cannulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pediatr. 2016 Dec;175(12):1975-1988. doi: 10.1007/s00431-016-2796-5. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
PMID: 27785562BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anabela Salgueiro-Oliveira, Ph.D
Assistant Professor
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Because of the physical nature of the interventions, it will not be possible to conceal the group allocation from the nurses or trial participants.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Ph.D, Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 9, 2018
First Posted
June 20, 2018
Study Start
October 1, 2018
Primary Completion
November 30, 2019
Study Completion
December 1, 2019
Last Updated
February 8, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No individual participant data will be shared with other researchers.