NCT01104103

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the BOA(R)-Constricting IV Band is superior to standard methods for starting an IV.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
467

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2010

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2010

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 9, 2010

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 15, 2010

Completed
16 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2010

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2010

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 20, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

August 20, 2012

Status Verified

July 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

April 9, 2010

Results QC Date

July 16, 2012

Last Update Submit

July 16, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

Catheterization, PeripheralDisposable EquipmentEmergency Medical TechniciansEmergency Nursing

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Success

    This outcome will measure self-reported success at starting the peripheral intravenous lines in the upper extremity of adults. Success is defined as an IV line through which blood may be aspirated and flushes freely without evidence of fluid extravasation. To be successful, the IV must be placed within a maximum of three attempts. We will report the number and percentage of patients with successful for both therapies.

    five minutes (average)

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • First Stick Success

    Five minutes (average)

Study Arms (2)

BOA(R)

EXPERIMENTAL

Nurse or paramedic uses the BOA(R)-Constricting IV Band to attempt placement of an upper extremity IV in an adult

Device: BOA(R)-Constricting IV Band

Standard care

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Nurse or paramedic uses standard IV starting technique in the upper extremity of adults

Device: Standard elastic constricting band

Interventions

Device applied in accordance with manufacturer's instructions

Also known as: NSN: 6515-01-537-2611
BOA(R)

Standard therapy

Also known as: elastic constricting band (Cardinal Health; McGaw Park, IL)
Standard care

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Paramedics employed by the City of Houston or nurses employed by Memorial Hermann Hospital - Texas Medical Center
  • Agree to participate through written consent process

You may not qualify if:

  • City of Houston paramedics and Memorial Hermann Hospital - Texas Medical Center nurses who do not provide written informed consent to participate

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Houston Fire Department

Houston, Texas, 77002, United States

Location

Memorial Hermann Hospital-Texas Medical Center

Houston, Texas, 77030-1501, United States

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Black KJ, Pusic MV, Harmidy D, McGillivray D. Pediatric intravenous insertion in the emergency department: bevel up or bevel down? Pediatr Emerg Care. 2005 Nov;21(11):707-11. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000186422.77140.1f.

    PMID: 16280942BACKGROUND
  • Meier J, Schreier E. Human plasma levels of some anti-migraine drugs. Headache. 1976 Jul;16(3):96-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1976.hed1603096.x. No abstract available.

    PMID: 965227BACKGROUND
  • Jacobson AF, Winslow EH. Variables influencing intravenous catheter insertion difficulty and failure: an analysis of 339 intravenous catheter insertions. Heart Lung. 2005 Sep-Oct;34(5):345-59. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2005.04.002.

    PMID: 16157191BACKGROUND
  • Lapostolle F, Catineau J, Garrigue B, Monmarteau V, Houssaye T, Vecci I, Treoux V, Hospital B, Crocheton N, Adnet F. Prospective evaluation of peripheral venous access difficulty in emergency care. Intensive Care Med. 2007 Aug;33(8):1452-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0634-y. Epub 2007 Jun 7.

    PMID: 17554524BACKGROUND
  • Pons PT, Moore EE, Cusick JM, Brunko M, Antuna B, Owens L. Prehospital venous access in an urban paramedic system--a prospective on-scene analysis. J Trauma. 1988 Oct;28(10):1460-3. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198810000-00009.

    PMID: 3172305BACKGROUND

Limitations and Caveats

There was a significant disparity between subjective opinion and objective results. Nurses and paramedics who used the BOA were uniformly positive in their comments about the device.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Richard Bradley
Organization
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Study Officials

  • Richard N Bradley, M.D.

    The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor - Emergency Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 9, 2010

First Posted

April 15, 2010

Study Start

March 1, 2010

Primary Completion

May 1, 2010

Study Completion

May 1, 2010

Last Updated

August 20, 2012

Results First Posted

August 20, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-07

Locations