Study Stopped
Pre-determined stopping point met with signficant difference between intervention and control groups.
Effectiveness Study of the BOA(R)-Constricting IV Band
The BOA(R)-Constricting IV Band: A Single Blind, Cohort Study of Effectiveness
1 other identifier
interventional
467
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the BOA(R)-Constricting IV Band is superior to standard methods for starting an IV.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2010
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 9, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 15, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 20, 2012
CompletedAugust 20, 2012
July 1, 2012
2 months
April 9, 2010
July 16, 2012
July 16, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Success
This outcome will measure self-reported success at starting the peripheral intravenous lines in the upper extremity of adults. Success is defined as an IV line through which blood may be aspirated and flushes freely without evidence of fluid extravasation. To be successful, the IV must be placed within a maximum of three attempts. We will report the number and percentage of patients with successful for both therapies.
five minutes (average)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
First Stick Success
Five minutes (average)
Study Arms (2)
BOA(R)
EXPERIMENTALNurse or paramedic uses the BOA(R)-Constricting IV Band to attempt placement of an upper extremity IV in an adult
Standard care
ACTIVE COMPARATORNurse or paramedic uses standard IV starting technique in the upper extremity of adults
Interventions
Device applied in accordance with manufacturer's instructions
Standard therapy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Paramedics employed by the City of Houston or nurses employed by Memorial Hermann Hospital - Texas Medical Center
- Agree to participate through written consent process
You may not qualify if:
- City of Houston paramedics and Memorial Hermann Hospital - Texas Medical Center nurses who do not provide written informed consent to participate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Houston Fire Department
Houston, Texas, 77002, United States
Memorial Hermann Hospital-Texas Medical Center
Houston, Texas, 77030-1501, United States
Related Publications (5)
Black KJ, Pusic MV, Harmidy D, McGillivray D. Pediatric intravenous insertion in the emergency department: bevel up or bevel down? Pediatr Emerg Care. 2005 Nov;21(11):707-11. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000186422.77140.1f.
PMID: 16280942BACKGROUNDMeier J, Schreier E. Human plasma levels of some anti-migraine drugs. Headache. 1976 Jul;16(3):96-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1976.hed1603096.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 965227BACKGROUNDJacobson AF, Winslow EH. Variables influencing intravenous catheter insertion difficulty and failure: an analysis of 339 intravenous catheter insertions. Heart Lung. 2005 Sep-Oct;34(5):345-59. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2005.04.002.
PMID: 16157191BACKGROUNDLapostolle F, Catineau J, Garrigue B, Monmarteau V, Houssaye T, Vecci I, Treoux V, Hospital B, Crocheton N, Adnet F. Prospective evaluation of peripheral venous access difficulty in emergency care. Intensive Care Med. 2007 Aug;33(8):1452-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0634-y. Epub 2007 Jun 7.
PMID: 17554524BACKGROUNDPons PT, Moore EE, Cusick JM, Brunko M, Antuna B, Owens L. Prehospital venous access in an urban paramedic system--a prospective on-scene analysis. J Trauma. 1988 Oct;28(10):1460-3. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198810000-00009.
PMID: 3172305BACKGROUND
Limitations and Caveats
There was a significant disparity between subjective opinion and objective results. Nurses and paramedics who used the BOA were uniformly positive in their comments about the device.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Richard Bradley
- Organization
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Richard N Bradley, M.D.
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor - Emergency Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 9, 2010
First Posted
April 15, 2010
Study Start
March 1, 2010
Primary Completion
May 1, 2010
Study Completion
May 1, 2010
Last Updated
August 20, 2012
Results First Posted
August 20, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-07