NCT03563573

Brief Summary

Randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of the effect of a single dose of potassium on ADHD symptoms as measured by changes in measures of symptoms of ADHD correlated with the results of their Lidocaine Effectiveness Test.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2018

Shorter than P25 for phase_1

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 15, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 20, 2018

Completed
11 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2018

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 4, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

June 20, 2018

Status Verified

June 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

May 15, 2018

Last Update Submit

June 14, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Conditions in which lidocaine is ineffective

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Prevalence of lidocaine ineffectiveness in those with ADHD

    Investigator assesses identification and intensity of tastes (such as sweet) before and after application of oral lidocaine gel to the tongue.

    Baseline

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0

    1-2 hours after intervention

  • Other discomforts

    1-2 hours after intervention

  • Change in ADHD-RS questionnaires

    Baseline and ~1-2 hours later, 1 hour after intervention

  • Change in Clinical Global Impression Physician Completed Questionnaire

    Baseline and ~1-2 hours later, 1 hour after intervention

  • Change in scores using Quotient ADHD System

    Baseline and ~1 hour after intervention

Study Arms (4)

Lidocaine-effective ADHD: Intervention

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Single-dose potassium gluconate oral capsule intervention for ADHD subjects for whom lidocaine is effective

Drug: Potassium Gluconate Oral Capsule

Lidocaine-effective ADHD: Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Single-dose placebo oral capsule intervention for ADHD subjects for whom lidocaine is effective

Drug: Placebo oral capsule

Lidocaine-ineffective ADHD: Intervention

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Single-dose potassium gluconate oral capsule intervention for ADHD subjects for whom lidocaine is ineffective

Drug: Potassium Gluconate Oral Capsule

Lidocaine-ineffective ADHD: placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Single-dose placebo oral capsule intervention for ADHD subjects for whom lidocaine is ineffective

Drug: Placebo oral capsule

Interventions

Each subject will receive a dose of \~8 mg/kg of potassium. We will be giving a maximum of 14 mEq in a single dose.

Lidocaine-effective ADHD: InterventionLidocaine-ineffective ADHD: Intervention

Each subject will receive a dose of \~8 mg/kg of a placebo capsule

Lidocaine-effective ADHD: PlaceboLidocaine-ineffective ADHD: placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age13 Years - 49 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Previously documented ADHD diagnosis
  • Untreated or taking existing ADHD drugs, but symptoms poorly controlled (e.g., symptoms not well managed by amphetamines, including ongoing inattention and impulsivity)

You may not qualify if:

  • Well treated with existing ADHD medication
  • Epilepsy
  • IQ less than 80
  • Severe head trauma that led to loss of consciousness for more than an hour or required surgery
  • Birth weight below 5 pounds or 2270 grams
  • Severe autism (milder conditions described as Asperger syndrome or "high-functioning autism" are not excluded)
  • Comorbid psychiatric disorders, such as generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, and any co-morbid condition at the discretion of the PI that would interfere with a patient's ability to participate
  • Mouth lesions, known to temporarily interfere with lidocaine effectiveness
  • Renal disease or abnormal kidney function or receiving dialysis
  • An individual has a factor likely to reduce penetrance, including excessive salt loss, such as caked salt on the body after exercise and Cystic fibrosis in a relative suggestive of the individual being a carrier.
  • Heart arrhythmia, known or evident on ECG
  • Known intolerance or allergy to lidocaine
  • Already taking supplemental potassium or renin angiotensin aldosterone inhibitors or other potassium elevating agents (see list below)
  • Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
  • Alacepril (not available in US)
  • +40 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Clinical Research Center of New Jersey (CRCNJ)

Voorhees Township, New Jersey, 08043, United States

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Infante MA, Moore EM, Nguyen TT, Fourligas N, Mattson SN, Riley EP. Objective assessment of ADHD core symptoms in children with heavy prenatal alcohol exposure. Physiol Behav. 2015 Sep 1;148:45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.10.014. Epub 2014 Oct 23.

    PMID: 25447751BACKGROUND
  • Levitt JO. Practical aspects in the management of hypokalemic periodic paralysis. J Transl Med. 2008 Apr 21;6:18. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-6-18.

    PMID: 18426576BACKGROUND
  • Nakai Y, Milgrom P, Mancl L, Coldwell SE, Domoto PK, Ramsay DS. Effectiveness of local anesthesia in pediatric dental practice. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000 Dec;131(12):1699-705. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0115.

    PMID: 11143733BACKGROUND
  • Segal MM. We cannot say whether attention deficit hyperactivity disorder exists, but we can find its molecular mechanisms. Pediatr Neurol. 2014 Jul;51(1):15-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2014.04.014. Epub 2014 Apr 18. No abstract available.

    PMID: 24938135BACKGROUND
  • Segal MM, Rogers GF, Needleman HL, Chapman CA. Hypokalemic sensory overstimulation. J Child Neurol. 2007 Dec;22(12):1408-10. doi: 10.1177/0883073807307095.

    PMID: 18174562BACKGROUND
  • Segal MM, Douglas AF. Late sodium channel openings underlying epileptiform activity are preferentially diminished by the anticonvulsant phenytoin. J Neurophysiol. 1997 Jun;77(6):3021-34. doi: 10.1152/jn.1997.77.6.3021.

    PMID: 9212254BACKGROUND
  • Teicher MH, Polcari A, Fourligas N, Vitaliano G, Navalta CP. Hyperactivity persists in male and female adults with ADHD and remains a highly discriminative feature of the disorder: a case-control study. BMC Psychiatry. 2012 Nov 7;12:190. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-190.

    PMID: 23134619BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior DisordersNeurodevelopmental DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Michael M Segal, MD PhD

    PhenoSolve, LLC

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Mark Mintz, MD

    CNNH & CRCNJ

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The scoring of the lidocaine test is masked, using the coded identity of the tastes. The scoring will be done during the visit by the Scoring and Randomization Specialist so that the patient can be assigned to an intervention or control group to maintain equal numbers in treatment versus control groups. To prevent bias, the Scoring and Randomization Specialist will not be involved in any of the ADHD assessment steps and the patients will not be told about their lidocaine status until after all study testing is done. The subjects and other study personnel such as those doing the ADHD testing will be told not to discuss what they could or couldn't taste. Having scored the lidocaine test, the Scoring and Randomization Specialist will assign subjects to Intervention versus Control using a 1-to-1 allocation.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The trial will have 2 arms, lidocaine sensitive (effective) and lidocaine insensitive (ineffective). The sample will be enriched to have 50% in each arm. Within each arm, subjects will be randomized on a 1-to-1 allocation to the treatment or control groups. The investigators will adopt an iterative approach of testing of batches of subjects because (1) the frequency of lidocaine-insensitivity is only known approximately, (2) the frequency may be unevenly distributed across ethnic groups, and (3) the exact effect size of the potassium is not known, though reported to be high in off-label use in clinical settings with more chronic administration. At the end of testing 40 patients, the results will be analyzed for statistical significance. (1) If the results are statistically significant with a 95% confidence, the testing may stop with the first batch of 40 subjects. (2) If not, sequential, iterative batches of 20 subjects will be tested, and the results reanalyzed.
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2018

First Posted

June 20, 2018

Study Start

July 1, 2018

Primary Completion

November 4, 2018

Study Completion

December 31, 2018

Last Updated

June 20, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

We plan to submit for publication descriptions of what was accomplished, and the evaluations as described in the study, including the incidence of lidocaine ineffectiveness in those with ADHD.

Shared Documents
CSR
Time Frame
When the study is complete
Access Criteria
open

Locations