NCT03560765

Brief Summary

Mobile electronic devices (MED) including, smartphones and tablets, offer a new type of assistive technology for visually-impaired people (VIP). They offer the possibility to replace optical magnifiers for those with mild impairment, and braille or auditory for those with severe visual loss, using standard consumer devices, which are relatively cheap and convenient. However not all VIP and rehabilitation professionals are familiar with the devices and their potential. In this study VIP who are interested in purchasing a MED will be recruited and trained. The effectiveness of this training will be determined by assessing the usage of devices by the participants from completion of training to 6 months, using questionnaires, and by remote monitoring of their MED. Validated questionnaires will be used to measure changes in quality of life, depression, adaptation to vision loss, and ability to carry out everyday tasks, before and after training, and 6 months later. Ongoing support has been found to be important when introducing users to new technology, in the form of volunteers to provide assistance and advice. The standard "training course only" model will therefore be compared to a scheme in which each participant is paired with a "buddy" (a university student) who can provide continuing support by visiting the VIP regularly at home.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
25

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 22, 2018

Completed
27 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 18, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2018

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

November 19, 2021

Status Verified

November 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

May 22, 2018

Last Update Submit

November 11, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

RehabilitationAssistive technology

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Vision QoL Core Measure VCM-1

    A 9-item instrument to measure vision related quality of life. Each item scored from 0-4 with a maximum score of 36. Low score represents poor QoL.

    2 months

  • Vision QoL Core Measure VCM-1

    A 9-item instrument to measure vision related quality of life. Each item scored from 0-4 with a maximum score of 36. Low score represents poor QoL.

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)

    2 months

  • Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)

    6 months

  • Acceptance and Self Worth Adjustment Scale ASWAS

    2 months

  • Acceptance and Self Worth Adjustment Scale ASWAS

    6 months

  • Modified Manchester Low Vision Questionnaire with Canadian Occupational Performance Measure

    2 months

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (4)

Using MED assigned buddy

EXPERIMENTAL

Participant has been randomly assigned a student volunteer buddy, and has chosen to purchase an MED following training

Device: MEDOther: Buddy

Using MED training only

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participant has been randomly assigned to not have a student volunteer buddy, and has chosen to purchase an MED following training

Device: MED

No MED, assigned buddy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participant has been randomly assigned a student volunteer buddy, and has chosen not to purchase an MED following training

Other: Buddy

No MED, no buddy

NO INTERVENTION

Participant has been randomly assigned to not have a student volunteer buddy, and has chosen not to purchase an MED following training

Interventions

MEDDEVICE

Training in the use of mainstream electronic devices with accessibility options

Also known as: smartphone, tablet, mobile electronic device
Using MED assigned buddyUsing MED training only
BuddyOTHER

A buddy who will meet with the participant regularly for social interaction, and assistance with use of any MED purchased

Also known as: Student volunteer
No MED, assigned buddyUsing MED assigned buddy

Eligibility Criteria

Age19 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • EITHER expresses an interest/referred specifically for MED training
  • OR After evaluation it appears that MED would meet some/all requirements
  • Willing to delay involvement in other forms of training or befriending for 6 months
  • Has some form vision - does not rely exclusively on other senses
  • Willing to travel for training/evaluation/meeting with buddy
  • Agree not to seek additional formal/organised MED training elsewhere during the study
  • Willing to fund any required MED personally
  • Habitual language English
  • item Cognitive Impairment Test score 7 or lower
  • Best corrected visual acuity logMAR 0.5 - 1.6 and/or log contrast sensitivity \<1.2

You may not qualify if:

  • Will be undergoing other one-to-one/group training (for anything) at the same time
  • Will be undergoing other MED/general computer training at the same time
  • Will be actively enrolled in a new befriending/social group
  • Already knows basics of MED and wants training on advanced skills
  • Obvious cognitive impairment or uncorrected hearing loss such that communication is through a third party
  • If updated Rx would improve VA by 2 lines or more, participant should be recommended to seek eye exam and then be re-evaluated 1 month later
  • Visual condition likely to be treated/improved within study period such that MED no longer required

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

City University of London

London, EC1V 0HB, United Kingdom

Location

University of Manchester

Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Vision, Low

Interventions

Vaginal Creams, Foams, and Jellies

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Vision DisordersSensation DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesEye DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Dosage FormsPharmaceutical PreparationsFeminine Hygiene ProductsEquipment and Supplies

Study Officials

  • Chris Dickinson

    University of Manchester

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor of Clinical Optometry

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2018

First Posted

June 18, 2018

Study Start

August 1, 2018

Primary Completion

August 1, 2020

Study Completion

August 1, 2020

Last Updated

November 19, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-11

Locations