NCT03558815

Brief Summary

Mental health service provision of adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) is often criticized. There is a lack of empirically studies targeting the psychotropic and psychotherapeutic treatment in this population. The PROMPT-ID study therefore aims to assess the prevalence of psychotropic medication and psychotherapeutic treatment in adults with mild to profound ID and the quality of psychotropic medication. It further aims to identify predictors of psychotropic medication, of barriers into psychotherapeutic treatment and of good clinical psychotropic medication prescription practice. It is a cross-sectional, epidemiological study carried out in Saxony, Germany. Approval of the responsible ethics committee was obtained. The inclusion criteria are mild to profound forms of ID and an age of 18 years or older. A representative sample is realized by a two-stage sampling procedure. Sheltered working and accommodation service providers are stratified by type of service provider and workshop size/type of accommodation. The stratified cluster sampling is realized by a random selection of service providing institutions followed by a random selection of adults with ID. An estimated total number of n = 200 study participants via sheltered workshops and n = 400 via residential accommodations need to be contacted to obtain data of approximately n = 131 study participants recruited through sheltered workshops and n = 232 participants through sheltered living institutions. Based on a psychotropic medication prevalence of 30%, in- depth interviews about psychotropic prescription practice of an estimated number of n = 109 adults with ID are carried out. Data collection is realized in interviews with key carers in the living environment and, if applicable, with the prescribing physician. If the adults with ID are currently medicated with psychotropics, basic information e.g. about kind, agent, dosage and treatment duration are obtained and a newly developed interview targeting the quality of the psychotropic medication treatment is conducted with the carers. In addition to the prevalence and quality of psychotropic and psychotherapeutic health care utilisation, other parameters like psychiatric symptomatology, problem behavior, sociodemografic and institutional factors and parameters of the provision area are assessed using well- established instruments. Findings will fill the lack of representative data that is urgently needed in this often criticized health service area.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
197

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2017

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2017

Completed
1 year until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 15, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 15, 2018

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 31, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 31, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

July 22, 2019

Status Verified

July 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

May 15, 2018

Last Update Submit

July 18, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

intellectual disabilitypsychotropic medicationmental health services evaluation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Quality of psychotropic medication (Interview for Assessing the Quality of Psychopharmacological Treatment of Adults with Intellectual Disabilities (IQP-ID; Schützwohl et al., 2017)

    If the adults with ID had a psychotropic medication prescription of at least one of the following six substance classes in the past three months: neuroleptics, antidepressants, benzodiazepines, lithium, anxiolytics/sedatives and/or antiepileptics, the Interview for Assessing the Quality of Psychopharmacological Treatment of Adults with Intellectual Disabilities (IQP-ID; Schützwohl et al., 2017) is conducted. This interview assesses the prescription practice of psychotropic medication in adults with ID. It is based on current guidelines of psychotropic medication prescription in adults with ID.The interview comprises 13 quality indicators that are assigned to one of 7 domains.

    3 months

Study Arms (1)

Adults with mild, moderate, severe or profound ID

Adults with mild, moderate, severe or profound ID in contact with either a sheltered workshop and/ or sheltered living Institution in Saxony.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

The study population are adults with mild to profound levels of intellectual disability using sheltered working and/or sheltered accommodation services.

You may qualify if:

  • Mild to profound levels of ID
  • Age of 18 years or older

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of psychiatry and Psychotherapy

Dresden, Germany

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Koch A, Dobrindt J, Schutzwohl M. Psychotropic medication and psychotherapeutic treatment of adults with intellectual disabilities (PROMPT-ID): a cross-sectional, epidemiological study in Saxony, Germany. BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 19;8(12):e025947. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025947.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Intellectual Disability

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNeurodevelopmental DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Matthias Schützwohl, Prof. Dr.

    Department of Psychiatry and Psychoptherapy

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Head of Mental Health Services Research Group

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2018

First Posted

June 15, 2018

Study Start

May 1, 2017

Primary Completion

May 31, 2019

Study Completion

May 31, 2019

Last Updated

July 22, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-07

Locations