Cricoid Pressure vs. Paralaryngeal Pressure to Prevent Regurgitation
A Comparison of the Effects of Cricoid Pressure and Paralaryngeal Pressure to Prevent Regurgitation of Gastric Contents
1 other identifier
observational
96
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Comparing the effects of ' Cricoid pressure' or 'Paralaryngeal pressure' during endotracheal intubation procedure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jun 2018
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 26, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 15, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 5, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 5, 2019
CompletedAugust 16, 2019
August 1, 2019
1 year
April 26, 2018
August 13, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Occlusion of esophagus
Occlusion of esophagus is checked under the application of cricoid and paralaryngeal pressures during direct laryngsocpy
for 1 minute during direct laryngosopy
Secondary Outcomes (3)
The relative position of the upper esophageal end to the glottis
1 minute before and after the induction of anesthesia, during direct laryngoscopy
The outer anteroposterior diameter of the upper esophageal end
During 1 minute in awake and anesthetized paralyzed states
POGO score
during direct laryngoscopy
Eligibility Criteria
Who has any surgery under general anesthesia and agree with the purpose of the study
You may qualify if:
- Who would be scheduled any surgery under general anesthesia and agree with the purpose of the study
You may not qualify if:
- Diseases or anatomical abnormalities in the neck, larynx, pharynx or esophagus,
- Aspiration tendency
- Known or predicted difficult airway.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center
Seoul, 156-707, South Korea
Related Publications (3)
Warner MA, Warner ME, Weber JG. Clinical significance of pulmonary aspiration during the perioperative period. Anesthesiology. 1993 Jan;78(1):56-62. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199301000-00010.
PMID: 8424572BACKGROUNDLienhart A, Auroy Y, Pequignot F, Benhamou D, Warszawski J, Bovet M, Jougla E. Survey of anesthesia-related mortality in France. Anesthesiology. 2006 Dec;105(6):1087-97. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200612000-00008.
PMID: 17122571BACKGROUNDKoenig SJ, Lakticova V, Mayo PH. Utility of ultrasonography for detection of gastric fluid during urgent endotracheal intubation. Intensive Care Med. 2011 Apr;37(4):627-31. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-2125-9. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
PMID: 21287147BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 26, 2018
First Posted
June 15, 2018
Study Start
June 1, 2018
Primary Completion
June 5, 2019
Study Completion
June 5, 2019
Last Updated
August 16, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share