NCT03553368

Brief Summary

Imaging of chest disorders is mainly achieved by using computed tomography. This is especially the case for detection, morphologic assessment and followup of pulmonary nodules. A positron emission tomography (PET) /CT may be additionally required for lung nodule management in some conditions including a size greater than 8 mm with morphologic or growing characteristics suspicious of malignancy. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) represents however an interesting alternative diagnostic radiation-free method, in particular owing to the recent development of sequences dedicated to lung parenchyma analysis. A major limitation remains the control of respiratory artefacts. High Frequency non-invasive ventilation, HF-NIV, has the potential to allow chest stabilization and is currently used in the department of radio-oncology at the Lausanne University Hospital. It has been recently applied to perform MRI and PET examinations at end inspiration during an "apnea " generated by the system. Continuous periods of respiratory stabilization of several minutes at end-inspiration are thus obtained, allowing prolonged MR and PET acquisitions with improvement of image quality as observed in our preliminary studies (Beigelman-Aubry et al., Prior et al.). Interestingly, the lung volume explored by using this ventilation technique is similar to that of CT studies, conversely to respiratory gated MR sequences which are currently performed at end-expiration, this potentially generating underevaluation of lung disorders especially at lung bases. The present project aims to determine the impact of HF-NIV in the management of patients with pulmonary nodule(s). After a first step of optimization of acquisition parameters of HF-NIV-MR in healthy volunteers, the performances of MRI and PET/CT (when required) under this ventilation technique will be compared to the current method(s) of reference in cases of pulmonary nodule(s) (CT scan and PET when required) and histological data when available. All MRI and PET/CT (when required) acquisitions will be performed without the ventilation technique, as used in current practice, and with it. The project was completed with an amendment to investigate MRI under continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). The MR-CPAP combination will be evaluated with optimized parameters in healthy volunteers and compared to free-breathing acquisitions without any device.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 15, 2018

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 12, 2018

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 14, 2018

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 16, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 16, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

October 19, 2020

Status Verified

October 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

May 15, 2018

Last Update Submit

October 14, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

lung nodules

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Image quality, step 1: Healthy volunteers, sharpness of vessels

    Sharpness of interfaces of vessels will be scored on a discrete scale as 1=blurred; 2=intermediate; 3=sharp. This will determine the adequate choice of MR sequences and parameters.

    day 1

  • Sensitivity for nodule detection, step 2: Patients (arm A)

    Determine whether HF-NIV-MR allows a better detection (higher sensitivity) of the presence of pulmonary nodules compared with conventional MR. CT will be used as gold standard.

    day 1

  • Sensitivity for nodule characterization, step 2: Patients (arm B)

    Determine whether sensitivity of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value obtained with HF-NIV-MR (diffusion sequence) to characterize nodules is higher than the sensitivity obtained with conventional MRI. Histological data will be used as gold standard when available.

    day 1

  • Assessment of CPAP-MR, step 1 bis: Healthy volunteers

    Determine whether CPAP-MR has an additional value compared with MR. Image quality of the CPAP-MR acquisition will be evaluated similarly to the methodology of step 1 and compared to the gold standard MR acquisition (free-breathing without any device).

    day 1

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Image quality, step 1: Healthy volunteers, sharpness of bronchi

    day 1

  • Image quality, step 1: Healthy volunteers, sharpness of fissures

    day 1

  • Image quality, step 1: Healthy volunteers, visibility of vessels

    day 1

  • Image quality, step 1: Healthy volunteers, visibility of bronchi

    day 1

  • Image quality, step 1: Healthy volunteers, visibility of fissures

    day 1

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (4)

Step 1: Healthy volunteers

EXPERIMENTAL

Experimental intervention: MRI data will be acquired with the use of HF-NIV (HF-NIV-MR). Control intervention: MRI data will be acquired without the use of HF-NIV, as a reference (MR).

Diagnostic Test: HF-NIV-MRDiagnostic Test: MR

Step 2: Patients (arm A)

EXPERIMENTAL

Experimental intervention: MRI data will be acquired with the use of HF-NIV (HF-NIV-MR). Control intervention: MRI data will also be acquired without the use of HF-NIV, as a reference (MR). The clinically prescribed CT will be the gold standard.

Diagnostic Test: HF-NIV-MRDiagnostic Test: MR

Step 2: Patients (arm B)

EXPERIMENTAL

Experimental intervention: PET/CT data will be acquired with the use of HF-NIV (HF-NIV-PET). MRI data will be acquired with the use of HF-NIV (HF-NIV-MR). PET/CT data will be acquired in inspiratory breath hold without the use of HF-NIV (PET/CT breath hold). Control intervention: Data from the clinically indicated PET/CT acquisition will be used as reference. MRI data will also be acquired without the use of HF-NIV, as a reference (MR). Histological data will be used when available.

Diagnostic Test: HF-NIV-MRDiagnostic Test: HF-NIV-PETDiagnostic Test: MRDiagnostic Test: PET/CT breath hold

Step 1 bis: Healthy volunteers

EXPERIMENTAL

Experimental intervention: MRI data will be acquired with the use of CPAP (CPAP-MR). Control intervention: MRI data will be acquired without the use of CPAP, as a reference (MR).

Diagnostic Test: MRDiagnostic Test: CPAP-MR

Interventions

HF-NIV-MRDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

MRI data will be acquired with the use of HF-NIV.

Step 1: Healthy volunteersStep 2: Patients (arm A)Step 2: Patients (arm B)
HF-NIV-PETDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

PET data will be acquired with the use of HF-NIV.

Step 2: Patients (arm B)
MRDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

MRI data will be acquired without the use of any device as a reference.

Step 1 bis: Healthy volunteersStep 1: Healthy volunteersStep 2: Patients (arm A)Step 2: Patients (arm B)
PET/CT breath holdDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

PET/CT data will be acquired in inspiratory breath hold without the use of HF-NIV.

Step 2: Patients (arm B)
CPAP-MRDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

MRI data will be acquired with the use of CPAP.

Step 1 bis: Healthy volunteers

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Validated Informed Consent as documented by signature (Appendix Informed Consent Form)
  • Depending on study arm:
  • Good health (step 1 and 1 bis only) or
  • Patients with at least 1 non calcified pulmonary nodule of at least 4 mm, whatever its texture (solid, sub-solid) and nature (benign, indeterminate or malignant), just discovered or in a follow-up context (step 2 only)
  • Age ≥ 18 years

You may not qualify if:

  • Previous or current disorder that might interfere with performance or safety of study procedures
  • Age \<18 years
  • Any contraindication to MRI (pace makers, neuro-stimulators, some implantable devices, some metallic implants, claustrophobia)
  • Any contraindication to a positive airway pressure therapy (claustrophobia, fracture of the skull, right heart failure), (step 1 bis)
  • Children, adolescents and adults with incapacities
  • Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma with severe obstruction
  • Severe obstructive patients (FEV1\<50% of predicted value)
  • Hypoxemia (SaO2\<94% AA)
  • History or physical signs of right heart failure
  • History or physical signs of right or left cardiac failure
  • History or physical signs of pulmonary hypertension
  • History or physical signs of active coronary artery disease
  • Pulmonary graft
  • +2 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospitals

Lausanne, 1011, Switzerland

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Beigelman-Aubry C, Peguret N, Stuber M, Delacoste J, Belmondo B, Lovis A, Simons J, Long O, Grant K, Berchier G, Rohner C, Bonanno G, Coppo S, Schwitter J, Ozsahin M, Qanadli S, Meuli R, Bourhis J. Chest-MRI under pulsatile flow ventilation: A new promising technique. PLoS One. 2017 Jun 12;12(6):e0178807. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178807. eCollection 2017.

    PMID: 28604833BACKGROUND
  • Prior JO, Peguret N, Pomoni A, Pappon M, Zeverino M, Belmondo B, Lovis A, Ozsahin M, Vienne M, Bourhis J. Reduction of Respiratory Motion During PET/CT by Pulsatile-Flow Ventilation: A First Clinical Evaluation. J Nucl Med. 2016 Mar;57(3):416-9. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.163386. Epub 2015 Dec 3.

    PMID: 26635339BACKGROUND
  • MacMahon H, Naidich DP, Goo JM, Lee KS, Leung ANC, Mayo JR, Mehta AC, Ohno Y, Powell CA, Prokop M, Rubin GD, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Travis WD, Van Schil PE, Bankier AA. Guidelines for Management of Incidental Pulmonary Nodules Detected on CT Images: From the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology. 2017 Jul;284(1):228-243. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161659. Epub 2017 Feb 23.

    PMID: 28240562BACKGROUND
  • Ohno Y, Koyama H, Yoshikawa T, Seki S, Takenaka D, Yui M, Lu A, Miyazaki M, Sugimura K. Pulmonary high-resolution ultrashort TE MR imaging: Comparison with thin-section standard- and low-dose computed tomography for the assessment of pulmonary parenchyma diseases. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Feb;43(2):512-32. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25008. Epub 2015 Jul 30.

    PMID: 26223818BACKGROUND
  • Darcot E, Delacoste J, Dunet V, Dournes G, Rotzinger D, Bernasconi M, Vremaroiu P, Simons J, Long O, Rohner C, Ledoux JB, Stuber M, Lovis A, Beigelman-Aubry C. Lung MRI assessment with high-frequency noninvasive ventilation at 3 T. Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Dec;74:64-73. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.09.006. Epub 2020 Sep 6.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neoplasms

Study Officials

  • Catherine Beigelman-Aubry, MD

    University Hospital Lausanne (CHUV), Radiology

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PD-MER, Head of the Chest Imaging Unit

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2018

First Posted

June 12, 2018

Study Start

June 14, 2018

Primary Completion

March 16, 2020

Study Completion

March 16, 2020

Last Updated

October 19, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations