Augmenting Exposure Therapy With Self-Distancing
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Anxiety is prevalent, impairing, and costly in childhood. Evidence-based treatments for pediatric anxiety exist; however, as many as 40-60% of youth do not demonstrate optimal response. By identifying psychological factors that potentiate symptom severity and treatment response, it may be possible to strengthen these factors to treat, or even prevent the development of youth emotional disorders. This study aims to examine whether the combination of Exposure and Self-Distancing is a feasible, acceptable, and efficient intervention for increasing perseverance in the face of exposures. This will be measured by child and parent report of treatment acceptability, examination of attendance and dropout rates, as well as participant and therapist report of participant engagement during exposures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable anxiety
Started Aug 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable anxiety
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 25, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 8, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 30, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 9, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 9, 2020
CompletedApril 15, 2020
April 1, 2020
1.6 years
May 25, 2018
April 14, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Acceptability of Self Distancing with exposure therapy
Treatment Acceptability Questionnaire version for the child and parent. Five Item scale (a score of 1 indicates that the care was not at all acceptable and a score of 7 would indicate a high level of acceptability). The treatment will be determined to have adequate acceptability and self-reported feasibility if parent and child report mean values greater than or equal to 5.
Week 8
Feasibility of Self Distancing based on treatment completion rates
Total number of sessions attended. Treatment will be determined to have adequate feasibility if participants attend, on average, greater than or equal to 70% of sessions, and high feasibility if participants attend, on average greater than or equal to 80% of sessions.
Week 8
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Treatment adherence and engagement
Weeks 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Change in anxiety severity
Screening, Week 8
Change in Clinical Global Impressions - Severity and improvement scale (CGI)
Screening, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Change in Clinical Global Impressions - Severity and improvement scale (CGI)
Weeks, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Study Arms (1)
Exposure Therapy and Self Distancing
EXPERIMENTALAll subjects will have 2 introduction sessions and then receive Exposure therapy with Self-Distancing (2 weeks) following Exposure therapy without Self-Distancing (2 weeks) followed by 2 more weeks of Exposure therapy with Self-Distancing.
Interventions
Weeks 1 and 2 will be introductory sessions (background, rationale, motivational enhancement); Weeks 3 \& 4 will have Exposure therapy with Self-Distancing; Weeks 5 \& 6 will have Exposure therapy only; Weeks 7 \& 8 will have Exposure therapy with Self-Distancing;
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Parent or guardian willing to give informed consent to participate
- Children who give written or oral assent
- Ages 7 and older to under 18 years old
- Has a historical anxiety diagnosis (diagnosed within the last year either within a clinical or clinical research setting) and have moderate or greater levels of current anxiety symptoms
- Current or past history of elevated symptoms of depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder and posttraumatic stress are allowable, but anxiety must be the chief complaint
- No evidence of acute risk due to suicidal intentions or behaviors in the past 6 months.
You may not qualify if:
- Currently receiving cognitive behavioral therapy or any other form of psychotherapy
- Have elevated symptoms of bipolar I/II disorder, schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder, schizophreniform disorder, psychosis Not otherwise specified (NOS), mental retardation, severe behavioral concerns, or autism
- History of current substance/alcohol abuse/dependence (Past history abuse is allowable if in remission for greater than 1 year)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Emily Bilek, PhD
University of Michigan
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 25, 2018
First Posted
June 8, 2018
Study Start
August 30, 2018
Primary Completion
April 9, 2020
Study Completion
April 9, 2020
Last Updated
April 15, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04