Balance Amongst Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
B-ATLAS
Postural Imbalance Amongst Elderly Patients With Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Before and After Decompressive Surgery
2 other identifiers
observational
80
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is one of the most common degenerative diseases of the spinal column, with symptoms including low back pain which worsens with ambulation, poor balance, decreased activity due to pain, and a marked decrease in quality of life (QoL). Prevalence rises with age, and current treatment options range from varied conservative management strategies, to surgical intervention with decompression of neural structures. While the effects of surgical decompression on back pain and QoL has been widely researched, the effects of surgery on patient balance is less well understood. Though patients generally have subjective improvements in this parameter after surgery, objective measurements in this patient group have been lacking. This study aims to investigate the effects of decompressive surgery on postural balance in elderly patients with LSS. Measurements of postural balance will be taken before and after decompressive surgery, as well as with regular intervals during a two-year follow-up period. A better understanding of the effect that LSS has on balance may lead to more patients being able to receive surgical treatment, which is hypothesized to lead to an increase in QoL and less perceived disability amongst this patient group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Sep 2023
Longer than P75 for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 11, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 21, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 10, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 20, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2028
July 10, 2024
July 1, 2024
3 years
September 11, 2023
July 9, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Postural balance
Postural balance, measured by sway area of center of pressure (mm\^2)
Before surgery and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Postural balance
Before surgery and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery
Quality of life
Before surgery and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery
Functional disability
Before surgery and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery
Quality of life
Before surgery and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery
Study Arms (1)
Patients with lumbar spinal stenosis
Patients diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis and referred to operation. Balance will be measured once in this group before operation, and four times again after operation.
Interventions
Decompressive lumbar spinal surgery
Eligibility Criteria
Patients over 65 years of age referred to decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 65 years
- Referred to decompressive spinal surgery due to symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis at ≥ 1 level
- Central canal LSS grade B or C (Schizas classification) at ≥ 1 level by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Minimum of 3 months of unsuccessful non-operative treatment
You may not qualify if:
- Signs of malignancy or infection in the spinal column
- Severe comorbidities incl. neurodegenerative conditions which may contribute to balance problems
- Revision surgery (previous decompression surgery at the same vertebral level)
- Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) score of ≤ 27 points
- Degenerative spondylolisthesis more than 3mm on pre-operative imaging diagnostics
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Region Zealandlead
- Region Syddanmarkcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Ortopædkirurgisk afdeling, Sjællands Universitetshospital Køge
Køge, 4600, Denmark
Rygcenter Syddanmark, Middelfart Sygehus
Middelfart, 5500, Denmark
Related Publications (36)
Binder DK, Schmidt MH, Weinstein PR. Lumbar spinal stenosis. Semin Neurol. 2002 Jun;22(2):157-66. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-36539.
PMID: 12524561BACKGROUNDSchroeder GD, Kurd MF, Vaccaro AR. Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: How Is It Classified? J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016 Dec;24(12):843-852. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00034.
PMID: 27849674BACKGROUNDKalichman L, Cole R, Kim DH, Li L, Suri P, Guermazi A, Hunter DJ. Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: the Framingham Study. Spine J. 2009 Jul;9(7):545-50. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.03.005. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
PMID: 19398386BACKGROUNDYabuki S, Fukumori N, Takegami M, Onishi Y, Otani K, Sekiguchi M, Wakita T, Kikuchi S, Fukuhara S, Konno S. Prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis, using the diagnostic support tool, and correlated factors in Japan: a population-based study. J Orthop Sci. 2013 Nov;18(6):893-900. doi: 10.1007/s00776-013-0455-5. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
PMID: 23963588BACKGROUNDKatz JN, Dalgas M, Stucki G, Katz NP, Bayley J, Fossel AH, Chang LC, Lipson SJ. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Diagnostic value of the history and physical examination. Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Sep;38(9):1236-41. doi: 10.1002/art.1780380910.
PMID: 7575718BACKGROUNDLurie J, Tomkins-Lane C. Management of lumbar spinal stenosis. BMJ. 2016 Jan 4;352:h6234. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6234.
PMID: 26727925BACKGROUNDLee BH, Moon SH, Suk KS, Kim HS, Yang JH, Lee HM. Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Pathophysiology and Treatment Principle: A Narrative Review. Asian Spine J. 2020 Oct;14(5):682-693. doi: 10.31616/asj.2020.0472. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
PMID: 33108834BACKGROUNDMazanec DJ, Podichetty VK, Hsia A. Lumbar canal stenosis: start with nonsurgical therapy. Cleve Clin J Med. 2002 Nov;69(11):909-17. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.69.11.909.
PMID: 12430977BACKGROUNDLiu K, Liu P, Liu R, Wu X, Cai M. Steroid for epidural injection in spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015 Jan 30;9:707-16. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S78070. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 25678775BACKGROUNDKovacs FM, Urrutia G, Alarcon JD. Surgery versus conservative treatment for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Sep 15;36(20):E1335-51. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820c97b1.
PMID: 21311394BACKGROUNDSengupta DK, Herkowitz HN. Lumbar spinal stenosis. Treatment strategies and indications for surgery. Orthop Clin North Am. 2003 Apr;34(2):281-95. doi: 10.1016/s0030-5898(02)00069-x.
PMID: 12914268BACKGROUNDPollock AS, Durward BR, Rowe PJ, Paul JP. What is balance? Clin Rehabil. 2000 Aug;14(4):402-6. doi: 10.1191/0269215500cr342oa.
PMID: 10945424BACKGROUNDIvanenko Y, Gurfinkel VS. Human Postural Control. Front Neurosci. 2018 Mar 20;12:171. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00171. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 29615859BACKGROUNDPaillard T, Noe F. Techniques and Methods for Testing the Postural Function in Healthy and Pathological Subjects. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:891390. doi: 10.1155/2015/891390. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
PMID: 26640800BACKGROUNDSibley KM, Howe T, Lamb SE, Lord SR, Maki BE, Rose DJ, Scott V, Stathokostas L, Straus SE, Jaglal SB. Recommendations for a core outcome set for measuring standing balance in adult populations: a consensus-based approach. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 13;10(3):e0120568. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120568. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 25768435BACKGROUNDQuijoux F, Nicolai A, Chairi I, Bargiotas I, Ricard D, Yelnik A, Oudre L, Bertin-Hugault F, Vidal PP, Vayatis N, Buffat S, Audiffren J. A review of center of pressure (COP) variables to quantify standing balance in elderly people: Algorithms and open-access code. Physiol Rep. 2021 Nov;9(22):e15067. doi: 10.14814/phy2.15067.
PMID: 34826208BACKGROUNDKim SD, Allen NE, Canning CG, Fung VS. Postural instability in patients with Parkinson's disease. Epidemiology, pathophysiology and management. CNS Drugs. 2013 Feb;27(2):97-112. doi: 10.1007/s40263-012-0012-3.
PMID: 23076544BACKGROUNDRuhe A, Fejer R, Walker B. Center of pressure excursion as a measure of balance performance in patients with non-specific low back pain compared to healthy controls: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 2011 Mar;20(3):358-68. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1543-2. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
PMID: 20721676BACKGROUNDBoucher P, Descarreaux M, Normand MC. Postural control in people with osteoarthritis of the cervical spine. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Mar;31(3):184-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.02.008.
PMID: 18394494BACKGROUNDFujimoto C, Egami N, Kinoshita M, Sugasawa K, Yamasoba T, Iwasaki S. Postural stability in vestibular neuritis: age, disease duration, and residual vestibular function. Laryngoscope. 2014 Apr;124(4):974-9. doi: 10.1002/lary.24342. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
PMID: 23929712BACKGROUNDAlexander NB. Postural control in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994 Jan;42(1):93-108. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb06081.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 8277123BACKGROUNDQuijoux F, Vienne-Jumeau A, Bertin-Hugault F, Zawieja P, Lefevre M, Vidal PP, Ricard D. Center of pressure displacement characteristics differentiate fall risk in older people: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2020 Sep;62:101117. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2020.101117. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
PMID: 32565327BACKGROUNDMuir SW, Berg K, Chesworth B, Speechley M. Use of the Berg Balance Scale for predicting multiple falls in community-dwelling elderly people: a prospective study. Phys Ther. 2008 Apr;88(4):449-59. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20070251. Epub 2008 Jan 24.
PMID: 18218822BACKGROUNDTinetti ME, Williams CS. The effect of falls and fall injuries on functioning in community-dwelling older persons. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1998 Mar;53(2):M112-9. doi: 10.1093/gerona/53a.2.m112.
PMID: 9520917BACKGROUNDMuir SW, Berg K, Chesworth B, Klar N, Speechley M. Quantifying the magnitude of risk for balance impairment on falls in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Apr;63(4):389-406. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.010. Epub 2009 Sep 9.
PMID: 19744824BACKGROUNDKim HJ, Chun HJ, Han CD, Moon SH, Kang KT, Kim HS, Park JO, Moon ES, Kim BR, Sohn JS, Shin SY, Jang JW, Lee KI, Lee HM. The risk assessment of a fall in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Apr 20;36(9):E588-92. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f92d8e.
PMID: 21242866BACKGROUNDTruszczynska A, Drzal-Grabiec J, Trzaskoma Z, Rapala K, Tarnowski A, Gorniak K. A comparative analysis of static balance between patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis and asymptomatic participants. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2014 Nov-Dec;37(9):696-701. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
PMID: 25267441BACKGROUNDTruszczynska A, Drzal-Grabiec J, Trzaskoma Z, Rachwal M, Rapala K, Gorniak K. Static balance after surgical decompression of lumbar spinal canal stenosis. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2015;28(4):865-71. doi: 10.3233/BMR-150646.
PMID: 26519120BACKGROUNDKneis S, Bruetsch V, Dalin D, Hubbe U, Maurer C. Altered postural timing and abnormally low use of proprioception in lumbar spinal stenosis pre- and post- surgical decompression. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 May 1;20(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2497-0.
PMID: 31043162BACKGROUNDIversen MD, Kale MK, Sullivan JT Jr. Pilot case control study of postural sway and balance performance in aging adults with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2009;32(1):15-21. doi: 10.1519/00139143-200932010-00004.
PMID: 19856631BACKGROUNDNegus JJ, Cawthorne D, Clark R, Negus O, Xu J, March PL, Parker D. Validity and reliability of the Nintendo Wii Fit Stillness score for assessment of standing balance. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2018 Sep 14;15:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.asmart.2018.09.001. eCollection 2019 Jan.
PMID: 30581757BACKGROUNDReed-Jones RJ, Dorgo S, Hitchings MK, Bader JO. WiiFit Plus balance test scores for the assessment of balance and mobility in older adults. Gait Posture. 2012 Jul;36(3):430-3. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.03.027. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
PMID: 22534562BACKGROUNDClark RA, Bryant AL, Pua Y, McCrory P, Bennell K, Hunt M. Validity and reliability of the Nintendo Wii Balance Board for assessment of standing balance. Gait Posture. 2010 Mar;31(3):307-10. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.11.012. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
PMID: 20005112BACKGROUNDScaglioni-Solano P, Aragon-Vargas LF. Validity and reliability of the Nintendo Wii Balance Board to assess standing balance and sensory integration in highly functional older adults. Int J Rehabil Res. 2014 Jun;37(2):138-43. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000046.
PMID: 24445863BACKGROUNDLeach JM, Mancini M, Peterka RJ, Hayes TL, Horak FB. Validating and calibrating the Nintendo Wii balance board to derive reliable center of pressure measures. Sensors (Basel). 2014 Sep 29;14(10):18244-67. doi: 10.3390/s141018244.
PMID: 25268919BACKGROUNDZielinski OB, Hallager DW, Jensen KY, Carreon L, Andersen MO, Diederichsen LP, Bech RD. Multicentre investigation on the effect of decompressive surgery on Balance and physical ActiviTy Levels amongst patients with lumbar Spinal stenosis (B-ATLAS): protocol for a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 23;14(9):e085667. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085667.
PMID: 39313282DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Oliver B Zielinski, MD
Region Zealand
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CROSSOVER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 11, 2023
First Posted
October 10, 2023
Study Start
September 21, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 20, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2028
Last Updated
July 10, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- A deidentified copy of all individual participant data will be kept by the authors of the study for 10 years following study end. After this time period, the full data set will be archived by the Danish National Archives with no planned end date.
- Access Criteria
- Reasonable request for access can be made by writing to ozi@regionsjaelland.dk or rudb@regionsjaelland.dk in a time period consisting of 10 years after study end. After this period, requests for access can be made to the Danish National Archives at data@sa.dk.
All deidentified individual participant data collected during the trial will be made available to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal for use, subject to approval by the study authors.