Evaluation Coroacromial Ligament Thickness
Should the Coroacromial Ligament be Evaluated in Shoulder Magnetic Resonance Imaging?
1 other identifier
observational
253
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this study, it was aimed to determine the relationship between pathologic findings and coracoacromial ligament thickness in magnetic resonance imaging in shoulder pain patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Mar 2017
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 23, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 6, 2018
CompletedJune 6, 2018
May 1, 2018
3 months
May 23, 2018
May 23, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Thickness of coracoacromial ligament
magnetic resonance imaging of coracoacromial ligament
1 week
Interventions
magnetic resonance imaging of shoulder
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with shoulder pain
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged over 15 years diagnosed with shoulder pain
You may not qualify if:
- Sensation and reflexes loss in the upper extremity
- Limitation in passive shoulder movements on physical examination
- Systemic rheumatic disease
- Diabetes mellitus
- Malignant disease
- Active infection
- Intraarticular injection
- Trauma
- History of surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Suleyman Demirel University
Isparta, Province, 32, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Çiğdem Aydoğan
Suleyman Demirel University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CROSSOVER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Medical Doctor in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 23, 2018
First Posted
June 6, 2018
Study Start
March 1, 2017
Primary Completion
June 1, 2017
Study Completion
August 1, 2017
Last Updated
June 6, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-05