NCT03543462

Brief Summary

Prospective randomized phase IV study aimed to value the impact of diaphragmatic surgery and the useful of intra-operatory thoracic drain in advanced ovarian cancer. Considering the fact that the diaphragmatic surgery could contribute with the incidence of post-operatory morbidity. The study is aimed to value the role of thoracic drain in post-operative outcomes as hospital stay, time to chemotherapy, drugs use and eventual interventions.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
88

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4 ovarian-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2018

Shorter than P25 for phase_4 ovarian-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 20, 2018

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 21, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 1, 2018

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 11, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 11, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

May 22, 2020

Status Verified

May 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

March 21, 2018

Last Update Submit

May 22, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Ovarian CancerDiaphragmChest DrainDiaphragmatic ResectionPleural Effusion

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Measurement of incidence of pleural effusion after diaphragmatic resection and useful of chest drain to prevent pleural effusion and consequent respiratory symptoms as dyspnea.

    The diaphragmatic surgery is often related to post-operative complication. The most common complication is pleural effusion. This condition contribute to decrease the clinical outcomes causing increase of hospitalization and necessity medical or surgical treatment. The main outcome is to asses a correct management of intra-operatory thoracic drain position after diaphragmatic surgery. The outcomes measured are: \- Incidence of post-operatory pleural effusion detected by chest RX measuring pleural fluid collection (cm)

    30 days

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Time to start chemotherapy

    40 Days

  • Estimated blood loss

    1 Day

  • Operative time

    1 Day

Study Arms (2)

Arm A: Chest tube positioning YES

SHAM COMPARATOR

Patients enrolled for chest tube positioning

Device: thoracic Drain Tube 24 Fr.

Arm B: Chest tube positioning NO

NO INTERVENTION

Patients enrolled for diaphragm closure without chest tube positioning

Interventions

Positioning of Thoracic Drain after diaphragmatic resection and consequently diaphragmatic repair

Arm A: Chest tube positioning YES

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age \> 18 \< 80 years
  • Patient's informed consent
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists: \< class III or IV
  • No actual pregnancies or pelvic inflammatory disease (P.I.D.)
  • BMI \< 40
  • Macroscopic diaphragmatic disease infiltration (mono lateral)
  • Grade IIIA-IV diaphragmatic resection score
  • Advanced stage ovarian cancer (stage III-IV)
  • Primary diagnosis, interval debulking surgery, recurrent disease
  • All histotype included

You may not qualify if:

  • Actual pregnancies or P.I.D
  • BMI \> 40
  • Pulmonary or thoracic preoperatory disease
  • Preoperative pleural effusion
  • Residual thoracic disease after surgery
  • Residual diaphragmatic disease after surgery

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli

Roma, Rome, 00191, Italy

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013 Jan;63(1):11-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21166. Epub 2013 Jan 17.

    PMID: 23335087BACKGROUND
  • Eisenkop SM, Spirtos NM. What are the current surgical objectives, strategies, and technical capabilities of gynecologic oncologists treating advanced epithelial ovarian cancer? Gynecol Oncol. 2001 Sep;82(3):489-97. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6312.

    PMID: 11520145BACKGROUND
  • Bristow RE, Tomacruz RS, Armstrong DK, Trimble EL, Montz FJ. Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Mar 1;20(5):1248-59. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.5.1248.

    PMID: 11870167BACKGROUND
  • Winter WE 3rd, Maxwell GL, Tian C, Carlson JW, Ozols RF, Rose PG, Markman M, Armstrong DK, Muggia F, McGuire WP; Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug 20;25(24):3621-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.2517.

    PMID: 17704411BACKGROUND
  • Aletti GD, Dowdy SC, Podratz KC, Cliby WA. Surgical treatment of diaphragm disease correlates with improved survival in optimally debulked advanced stage ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Feb;100(2):283-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.08.027. Epub 2005 Sep 22.

    PMID: 16182350BACKGROUND
  • Tsolakidis D, Amant F, Van Gorp T, Leunen K, Neven P, Vergote I. The role of diaphragmatic surgery during interval debulking after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: an analysis of 74 patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 May;20(4):542-51. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181d4de23.

    PMID: 20686373BACKGROUND
  • Zapardiel I, Peiretti M, Zanagnolo V, Biffi R, Bocciolone L, Landoni F, Aletti G, Colombo N, Maggioni A. Diaphragmatic surgery during primary cytoreduction for advanced ovarian cancer: peritoneal stripping versus diaphragmatic resection. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011 Dec;21(9):1698-703. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31822f65c3.

    PMID: 22080893BACKGROUND
  • Fanfani F, Fagotti A, Gallotta V, Ercoli A, Pacelli F, Costantini B, Vizzielli G, Margariti PA, Garganese G, Scambia G. Upper abdominal surgery in advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer: role of diaphragmatic surgery. Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Mar;116(3):497-501. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.11.023. Epub 2009 Dec 11.

    PMID: 20004958BACKGROUND
  • Chereau E, Ballester M, Selle F, Cortez A, Pomel C, Darai E, Rouzier R. Pulmonary morbidity of diaphragmatic surgery for stage III/IV ovarian cancer. BJOG. 2009 Jul;116(8):1062-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02214.x. Epub 2009 May 14.

    PMID: 19459863BACKGROUND
  • Devolder K, Amant F, Neven P, van Gorp T, Leunen K, Vergote I. Role of diaphragmatic surgery in 69 patients with ovarian carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2008 Mar-Apr;18(2):363-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.01006.x.

    PMID: 18334014BACKGROUND
  • Eisenhauer EL, D'Angelica MI, Abu-Rustum NR, Sonoda Y, Jarnagin WR, Barakat RR, Chi DS. Incidence and management of pleural effusions after diaphragm peritonectomy or resection for advanced mullerian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Dec;103(3):871-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.05.023. Epub 2006 Jul 3.

    PMID: 16815536BACKGROUND
  • Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.

    PMID: 15273542BACKGROUND
  • Cliby W, Dowdy S, Feitoza SS, Gostout BS, Podratz KC. Diaphragm resection for ovarian cancer: technique and short-term complications. Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Sep;94(3):655-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.04.032.

    PMID: 15350355BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Ovarian NeoplasmsPleural Effusion

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Endocrine Gland NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsOvarian DiseasesAdnexal DiseasesGenital Diseases, FemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesGenital Neoplasms, FemaleUrogenital NeoplasmsGenital DiseasesEndocrine System DiseasesGonadal DisordersPleural DiseasesRespiratory Tract Diseases

Study Officials

  • Stefano Cianci, M.D.

    Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
The investigator check the random list only when the patients is enrolled.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Patients affected by advanced stage ovarian cancer with diaphragmatic involvement. When diaphragmatic resection is performed the patients are randomized to proceed with chest drain positioning or not
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Head of Department of Women's and Children's Health, Policlinico Agostino Gemelli Foundation University Hospital, Rome, Italy

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2018

First Posted

June 1, 2018

Study Start

March 20, 2018

Primary Completion

November 11, 2019

Study Completion

January 11, 2020

Last Updated

May 22, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-05

Locations