NCT03537638

Brief Summary

Principal objective: To produce scientific knowledge on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention for knowledge transfer and implementing a Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), formed by an educative intervention, an computerized clinical decision support system (SADC), complemented by an automated feedback built into the electronic clinical record. Secondary objectives will be previously developed: 1) the analysis of medical practice variations along the care of SLE patients in the Canary Islands Health Service (SCS); 2) the best available scientific evidence to support the optimal development of the SADC; 3) the context and the barriers to innovation implementation in the SCS; and 4) the development of the contents for the implementation strategy, including the SADC and the automated feedback. Methods for the main objective: The main objective will be assessed under an open, multicentric and randomized (by clusters) clinical trial, in the SCS. The multicomponent intervention will be compared to the usual procedures for CPG dissemination. The main measure will be the self-perceived activity of SLE rated by the SLAQ scale. Self-perceived health related quality of life (HRQoL) data will be obtained by means of the questionnaire EQ-5D-5L , to estimate a cost-effectiveness ratio. Methods for secondary objectives: The rest of the objectives will be developed by a mix of quantitative and qualitative research methods to allow adapting the design, development and execution of the intervention to the characteristics of the context.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
237

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 16, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 16, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 25, 2018

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 19, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

September 22, 2021

Status Verified

October 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

April 16, 2018

Last Update Submit

September 21, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

LupusQuality of lifeMulticomponent interventionClinical Practice GuidelineComputerized clinical decision support systemActivity

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change of self-perceived activity of the SLE

    Disease activity self-reported by the patient using the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Activity (SLAQ) Questionnaire

    18 months

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Change in professional's knowledge about SLE management

    18 months

  • Change in self-perceived health-related quality of life

    18 months

  • Change in self-perceived health-related quality of life

    18 months

  • Patient's perception of their participation in decision making

    18 months

  • Professional's attitude to partnership with the patient for shared decision making

    18 months

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Multicomponent Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

Rheumatologist and internist receive a multicomponent intervention

Behavioral: Multicomponent intervention

Control

NO INTERVENTION

Rheumatologist and internist provide the usual care

Interventions

Intervention to rheumatologist and internist responsible for the care of patients with SLE. Implementation multicomponent intervention consisting of: educational component, a computerized clinical decision support system developed from the clinical practice guide - SLE and automated feedback integrated into the electronic medical record system.

Multicomponent Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients:
  • Adults (older than 18 years) diagnosed with SLE of any seriousness and situation (active, remission or clinically quiescent and serologically active), who agree to participate and sign informed consent.
  • Health professionals:
  • Physicians specialized in rheumatology or internal medicine that include in their quotas a minimum of 30 patients with eligible SLE.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients:
  • SLE limited to the skin, advanced chronic kidney disease (dialysis or renal transplant); Mental illnesses and / or sensory or cognitive deficits; or participating in extension or follow-up studies of another RCT (possible change in follow-up guidelines). Participants in observational studies may be included as they do not change usual practice.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Servicio de EvaluaciĂ³n del Servicio Canario de la Salud

Santa Cruz de Tenerife, 38004, Spain

Location

Related Publications (29)

  • Serrano-Aguilar P, Kovacs FM, Cabrera-Hernandez JM, Ramos-Goni JM, Garcia-Perez L. Avoidable costs of physical treatments for chronic back, neck and shoulder pain within the Spanish National Health Service: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Dec 21;12:287. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-287.

    PMID: 22188790BACKGROUND
  • Ostbye T, Yarnall KS, Krause KM, Pollak KI, Gradison M, Michener JL. Is there time for management of patients with chronic diseases in primary care? Ann Fam Med. 2005 May-Jun;3(3):209-14. doi: 10.1370/afm.310.

    PMID: 15928223BACKGROUND
  • Zhu TY, Tam LS, Li EK. Cost-of-illness studies in systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 May;63(5):751-60. doi: 10.1002/acr.20410.

    PMID: 21557530BACKGROUND
  • Lerang K, Gilboe IM, Gran JT. Differences between rheumatologists and other internists regarding diagnosis and treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Apr;51(4):663-9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker318. Epub 2011 Dec 7.

    PMID: 22157467BACKGROUND
  • Bertsias G, Ioannidis JP, Boletis J, Bombardieri S, Cervera R, Dostal C, Font J, Gilboe IM, Houssiau F, Huizinga T, Isenberg D, Kallenberg CG, Khamashta M, Piette JC, Schneider M, Smolen J, Sturfelt G, Tincani A, van Vollenhoven R, Gordon C, Boumpas DT; Task Force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics. EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus. Report of a Task Force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Feb;67(2):195-205. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.070367. Epub 2007 May 15.

    PMID: 17504841BACKGROUND
  • Sidorenkov G, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM, de Zeeuw D, Denig P. A longitudinal study examining adherence to guidelines in diabetes care according to different definitions of adequacy and timeliness. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024278. Epub 2011 Sep 8.

    PMID: 21931669BACKGROUND
  • Perez X, Wisnivesky JP, Lurslurchachai L, Kleinman LC, Kronish IM. Barriers to adherence to COPD guidelines among primary care providers. Respir Med. 2012 Mar;106(3):374-81. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2011.09.010. Epub 2011 Oct 13.

    PMID: 22000501BACKGROUND
  • Kastner M, Bhattacharyya O, Hayden L, Makarski J, Estey E, Durocher L, Chatterjee A, Perrier L, Graham ID, Straus SE, Zwarenstein M, Brouwers M. Guideline uptake is influenced by six implementability domains for creating and communicating guidelines: a realist review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 May;68(5):498-509. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.013. Epub 2015 Jan 10.

    PMID: 25684154BACKGROUND
  • Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud PA, Rubin HR. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999 Oct 20;282(15):1458-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.15.1458.

    PMID: 10535437BACKGROUND
  • Jacobs SR, Weiner BJ, Bunger AC. Context matters: measuring implementation climate among individuals and groups. Implement Sci. 2014 Apr 17;9:46. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-46.

    PMID: 24742308BACKGROUND
  • Francke AL, Smit MC, de Veer AJ, Mistiaen P. Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: a systematic meta-review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Sep 12;8:38. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-38.

    PMID: 18789150BACKGROUND
  • Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Lavis JN, Hill SJ, Squires JE. Knowledge translation of research findings. Implement Sci. 2012 May 31;7:50. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-50.

    PMID: 22651257BACKGROUND
  • Sketris IS, Langille Ingram EM, Lummis HL. Strategic opportunities for effective optimal prescribing and medication management. Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Winter;16(1):e103-25. Epub 2009 Jan 30.

    PMID: 19182305BACKGROUND
  • Giguere A, Legare F, Grimshaw J, Turcotte S, Fiander M, Grudniewicz A, Makosso-Kallyth S, Wolf FM, Farmer AP, Gagnon MP. Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD004398. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004398.pub3.

    PMID: 23076904BACKGROUND
  • Shojania KG, Jennings A, Mayhew A, Ramsay CR, Eccles MP, Grimshaw J. The effects of on-screen, point of care computer reminders on processes and outcomes of care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8;2009(3):CD001096. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001096.pub2.

    PMID: 19588323BACKGROUND
  • Baker R, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Gillies C, Shaw EJ, Cheater F, Flottorp S, Robertson N. Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17;(3):CD005470. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005470.pub2.

    PMID: 20238340BACKGROUND
  • Gillaizeau F, Chan E, Trinquart L, Colombet I, Walton RT, Rege-Walther M, Burnand B, Durieux P. Computerized advice on drug dosage to improve prescribing practice. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 12;2013(11):CD002894. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002894.pub3.

    PMID: 24218045BACKGROUND
  • Murphy EV. Clinical decision support: effectiveness in improving quality processes and clinical outcomes and factors that may influence success. Yale J Biol Med. 2014 Jun 6;87(2):187-97. eCollection 2014 Jun.

    PMID: 24910564BACKGROUND
  • Ramallo-Farina Y, Garcia-Perez L, Castilla-Rodriguez I, Perestelo-Perez L, Wagner AM, de Pablos-Velasco P, Dominguez AC, Cortes MB, Vallejo-Torres L, Ramirez ME, Martin PP, Garcia-Puente I, Salinero-Fort MA, Serrano-Aguilar PG; INDICA team. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of knowledge transfer and behavior modification interventions in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients--the INDICA study: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 9;10:47. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0233-1.

    PMID: 25880498BACKGROUND
  • Roshanov PS, Fernandes N, Wilczynski JM, Hemens BJ, You JJ, Handler SM, Nieuwlaat R, Souza NM, Beyene J, Van Spall HG, Garg AX, Haynes RB. Features of effective computerised clinical decision support systems: meta-regression of 162 randomised trials. BMJ. 2013 Feb 14;346:f657. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f657.

    PMID: 23412440BACKGROUND
  • Lobach D, Sanders GD, Bright TJ, Wong A, Dhurjati R, Bristow E, Bastian L, Coeytaux R, Samsa G, Hasselblad V, Williams JW, Wing L, Musty M, Kendrick AS. Enabling health care decisionmaking through clinical decision support and knowledge management. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2012 Apr;(203):1-784.

    PMID: 23126650BACKGROUND
  • Hoffmann TC, Montori VM, Del Mar C. The connection between evidence-based medicine and shared decision making. JAMA. 2014 Oct 1;312(13):1295-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.10186. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25268434BACKGROUND
  • Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P, Cording E, Tomson D, Dodd C, Rollnick S, Edwards A, Barry M. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct;27(10):1361-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6. Epub 2012 May 23.

    PMID: 22618581BACKGROUND
  • Serrano-Aguilar P, Trujillo-Martin Mdel M, Perez de la Rosa A, Cuellar-Pompa L, Saavedra-Medina H, Linertova R, Perestelo-Perez L, Perez-Ramos J, Rivero-Santana A; Spanish SLE CPG Development Group. Patient participation in a Clinical Guideline Development for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Sep;98(9):1156-63. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.05.022. Epub 2015 Jun 11.

    PMID: 26095343BACKGROUND
  • Politi MC, Wolin KY, Legare F. Implementing clinical practice guidelines about health promotion and disease prevention through shared decision making. J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jun;28(6):838-44. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2321-0. Epub 2013 Jan 10.

    PMID: 23307397BACKGROUND
  • Loya SR, Kawamoto K, Chatwin C, Huser V. Service oriented architecture for clinical decision support: a systematic review and future directions. J Med Syst. 2014 Dec;38(12):140. doi: 10.1007/s10916-014-0140-z. Epub 2014 Oct 18.

    PMID: 25325996BACKGROUND
  • Panzarasa S, et al.Technical Solutions for Integrating Clinical Practice Guidelines with Electronic Patient Records. Volume 5943 of LNAI. Springer-Verlag 2010;141 -154

    BACKGROUND
  • Kawamoto K, Del Fiol G, Orton C, Lobach DF. System-agnostic clinical decision support services: benefits and challenges for scalable decision support. Open Med Inform J. 2010;4:245-54. doi: 10.2174/1874431101004010245. Epub 2010 Dec 14.

    PMID: 21603281BACKGROUND
  • Trujillo-Martin MM, Ramallo-Farina Y, Del Pino-Sedeno T, Rua-Figueroa I, Trujillo-Martin E, Vallejo-Torres L, Imaz-Iglesia I, Sanchez-de-Madariaga R, de Pascual-Medina AM, Serrano-Aguilar P; SLE-CPG-Implementation Group. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention to implement a clinical practice guideline for systemic lupus erythematosus: protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 1;19(1):783. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4589-9.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Lupus Erythematosus, SystemicMotor Activity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Connective Tissue DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System DiseasesBehavior

Study Officials

  • MarĂ­a de Mar Trujillo Martin, PhD

    Servicio de EvaluaciĂ³n del Servicio Canario de la Salud

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 16, 2018

First Posted

May 25, 2018

Study Start

April 16, 2018

Primary Completion

October 19, 2020

Study Completion

December 31, 2020

Last Updated

September 22, 2021

Record last verified: 2020-10

Locations