Implementing an IPTS Treatment Approach to Improve Outcomes in Suicidal Youth
Implementing an Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Treatment Approach to Improve Outcomes in Suicidal Youth
1 other identifier
interventional
123
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this project is to evaluate a set of interventions derived from a theory of suicide that supplements a clinical program and compare their effects on outcomes to the outcomes of the unsupplemented program. This study proposes to evaluate the effect of these interventions on reducing specific negative cognitions associated with depression and suicide ideation in an intensive outpatient program for suicidal youth (Suicide Prevention and Resilience at Children's, SPARC).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 14, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 2, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 17, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 7, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2019
CompletedNovember 1, 2019
October 1, 2019
1.3 years
May 2, 2018
October 30, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ) (Van Orden et al., 2012)
change in perceived burdensomeness
through program completion, an average of 6 weeks
Concise Health Risk Tracking Self Report (CHRT-SR) (Trivedi et al., 2011)
suicide ideation (self-report)
through program completion, an average of 6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Adolescent Version Self-Report (QIDS-A-SR-16) (Bernstein et al., 2010)
through program completion, an average of 6 weeks
Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ) (Van Orden et al., 2012)
1 month after program completion
Concise Health Risk Tracking Self Report (CHRT-SR) (Trivedi et al., 2011)
1 month after program completion
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Adolescent Version Self-Report (QIDS-A-SR-16) (Bernstein et al., 2010)
1 month after program completion
Concise Health Risk Tracking Self Report (CHRT-SR)
between program completion, an average of 6 weeks, and 1 month after program completion
Study Arms (2)
SPARC A
ACTIVE COMPARATORSPARC A is an existing clinical program which has a general focus on negative cognitions.
SPARC B
EXPERIMENTALSPARC B includes all aspects of the SPARC A clinical program, but targets negative cognitions of perceived burdensomeness in some sessions.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- adolescents, ages 12 - 17
- enrolled in the SPARC program at Children's Medical Center of Dallas
- completed at least 5 SPARC group therapy sessions
You may not qualify if:
- adolescents who have previously received treatment in the control arm of the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Children's Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75235, United States
Related Publications (3)
Bernstein IH, Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Hughes CW, Macleod L, Witte BP, Jain S, Mayes TL, Emslie GJ. Psychometric properties of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology in adolescents. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2010 Dec;19(4):185-94. doi: 10.1002/mpr.321.
PMID: 20683845BACKGROUNDTrivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, Morris DW, Fava M, Gollan JK, Warden D, Nierenberg AA, Gaynes BN, Husain MM, Luther JF, Zisook S, Rush AJ. Concise Health Risk Tracking scale: a brief self-report and clinician rating of suicidal risk. J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Jun;72(6):757-64. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11m06837.
PMID: 21733476BACKGROUNDVan Orden KA, Cukrowicz KC, Witte TK, Joiner TE. Thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness: construct validity and psychometric properties of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire. Psychol Assess. 2012 Mar;24(1):197-215. doi: 10.1037/a0025358. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
PMID: 21928908BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sunita M. Stewart, PhD
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- Participants are masked as to the treatment arm to which they are assigned. Care providers in the control arm are masked to the interventions being tested in the experimental arm, so as to not inadvertently deliver aspects of SPARC B intervention to the SPARC A group. The outcomes assessor is not collecting primary outcome data, which is self-reported via online survey.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 2, 2018
First Posted
May 17, 2018
Study Start
November 14, 2017
Primary Completion
March 7, 2019
Study Completion
June 1, 2019
Last Updated
November 1, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share