Effect of Zirconia Implant Supported PEKK Crowns Versus Lithium Disilicate Crowns on Esthetics
Evaluation of Esthetic and Biomechanical Outcome of Maxillary Anterior Single-Tooth Zirconia Implant Supported PEKK Crowns Versus Lithium Disilicate Crowns on PEKK Abutments: Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
10
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
aim of study is to evaluate esthetic and biomechanical outcome of maxillary anterior single-tooth zirconia implant supported PEKK crowns compared to lithium disilicate crowns on PEKK abutments .
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2018
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 26, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 11, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 15, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 15, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 15, 2019
CompletedMay 11, 2018
May 1, 2018
9 months
April 26, 2018
May 8, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Esthetic outcome
measured by pink and white esthetics score
9 month
Secondary Outcomes (1)
bone resorption
9 month
Study Arms (2)
lithium disilicate crowns
ACTIVE COMPARATORlithium disilicate crowns are well documented in the literatures as successful restoration modality.
poly ether ketone ketone crowns
EXPERIMENTALpekkton
Interventions
Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) forms a group of high-performance thermoplastic polymers. PEKK shows excellent biocompatibility and exhibits outstanding properties such as high wear resistance and high compressive (246 MPa), flexural (5.0GPa), and tensile strengths (115 MPa). The material is lightweight, allows shock absorption, and can be veneered with various commercially available dental materials
well documented in the literatures as successful restoration modality.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \>18 years
- No active intraoral or systemic disease
- No pregnancy or lactation
- controlled periodontal conditions
- Adequate bone volume to place an implant
- Occlusal function with a natural tooth
You may not qualify if:
- Current pregnancy.
- Psychiatric disorders.
- Smokers
- Poor motivation.
- Several occlusal parafunction.
- Persistent intraoral infections.
- Severe mucosal disease.
- Active periodontitis.
- Poor oral hygiene.
- Lack of occluding dentition at implant rehabilitation level
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lamiaa Abdelsalam, MSc
Cairo University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 26, 2018
First Posted
May 11, 2018
Study Start
September 15, 2018
Primary Completion
June 15, 2019
Study Completion
September 15, 2019
Last Updated
May 11, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-05