Study Stopped
Sponsor and PI mutual agreement to discontinue study early due to change in statistical analysis of data.
Azento IIS 3 Year Outcomes Implant Study
Clinical, Radiographic, and Histomorphometric Analysis of AstraTech Implant EV Placed and Immediately Provisionalized Into Preserved Alveolar Ridges: A Prospective 3-Year Outcomes Study
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The revised purpose of this study is to compare and evaluate the stability of the implant body, survival rate, bone-level changes, and the implant's soft-tissue outcomes over a period of 1 year. Only 1 tooth is studied per participant. In July of 2024, the revised protocol and revised Statistical Analysis plan were amended post-hoc, and the revised protocol and statistical analysis plan were approved by the IRB review committee in July of 2024. As a result, the study has been terminated due to a change in the study's data analysis, and so the study will only analyze data up to and including the 1-year point.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 29, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 31, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 5, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 3, 2024
CompletedOctober 3, 2024
September 1, 2024
4 years
January 31, 2020
August 12, 2024
September 8, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Participants That Had an Implant That Survived 1 Year After Permanent Final Crown Placement.
For participants that had permanent restoration of the final crown performed, this outcome is determined via clinical evaluation of the percentage of participants that still had their 1 implant in place after 1 year of having the permanent final crown placement. Note: Only 1 implant was placed per participant.
1 year after permanent final crown placement
Study Arms (1)
Implant Placement and Temporary Crown using AstraTech Implant System EV, Final Crown Delivery
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
At least 3 months after tooth removal and bone grafting, a dental implant will be placed using Azento, a commercially-available product that uses computer technology to plan the dental implant placement using the AstraTech Implant System EV and an immediate implant temporary crown using Azento. After 3 months with the temporary crown, a definitive all-ceramic crown, made using a digital workflow will be placed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects may identify as either male, female, or intersex
- Age: 18 years or older
- Subjects with a healed, single-rooted tooth (except mandibular incisors) that has previously undergone ARP-SG with particulate allograft material within the past 2 months.
- Subjects must have stable occlusion, with absence of caries or other known acute pathology (i.e., untreated endodontic lesion, periodontal abscess, external/internal resorption, etc.) on teeth proximal to the implant site that would negatively influence implant outcomes
- Must be in adequate physical and mental health to undergo routine dental treatment including the surgical procedures associated tooth extraction and implant placement
- Subjects' treatment plan must include replacement of the tooth to be extracted with dental implant supported fixed restoration
- Subjects must have read, understood and signed an informed consent form
- Subjects must be willing to return for the required number of visits
- Subjects' tooth must be a permanent tooth, not a primary tooth (also known as baby tooth).
You may not qualify if:
- Mandibular incisors
- Acute infection associated with the tooth to be extracted or with adjacent teeth
- Unstable occlusion, presence of caries or other acute pathology on teeth adjacent to the implant site
- History of significant heart, stomach, liver, kidney, blood, immune system disease, or other organ impairment or systemic diseases that would prevent undergoing the proposed treatment or may result in compromised healing (e.g. poorly controlled diabetes, active heavy tobacco use \[\>10 cigs/day\]), history of head/neck radiation, history of chemotherapy within the last 5 years
- Subjects with uncontrolled and/or severe metabolic bone diseases or disorders, such as osteoporosis, thyroid disorders or Paget's disease
- Subjects taking any medication or supplement known to largely influence bone metabolism, such as IV bisphosphonates, long-term history of oral bisphosphonates or chronic intake of glucocorticoids
- Pregnant women or nursing mothers
- Subjects that are unwilling or unable to sign the informed consent
- History of lack of compliance with dental visits
- Subjects unwilling to return for the required number of visits
- Subject currently undergoing orthodontic treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
Related Publications (33)
Alkan EA, Parlar A, Yildirim B, Senguven B. Histological comparison of healing following tooth extraction with ridge preservation using enamel matrix derivatives versus Bio-Oss Collagen: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Dec;42(12):1522-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.06.002. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
PMID: 23845297BACKGROUNDAraujo M, Linder E, Wennstrom J, Lindhe J. The influence of Bio-Oss Collagen on healing of an extraction socket: an experimental study in the dog. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008 Apr;28(2):123-35.
PMID: 18546808BACKGROUNDAraujo MG, da Silva JCC, de Mendonca AF, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following grafting of fresh extraction sockets in man. A randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Apr;26(4):407-412. doi: 10.1111/clr.12366. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
PMID: 24621203BACKGROUNDAraujo MG, Liljenberg B, Lindhe J. Dynamics of Bio-Oss Collagen incorporation in fresh extraction wounds: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Jan;21(1):55-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01854.x.
PMID: 20070748BACKGROUNDArora H, Khzam N, Roberts D, Bruce WL, Ivanovski S. Immediate implant placement and restoration in the anterior maxilla: Tissue dimensional changes after 2-5 year follow up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Aug;19(4):694-702. doi: 10.1111/cid.12487. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
PMID: 28429394BACKGROUNDAvila-Ortiz G, Elangovan S, Kramer KW, Blanchette D, Dawson DV. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2014 Oct;93(10):950-8. doi: 10.1177/0022034514541127. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
PMID: 24966231BACKGROUNDBarone A, Aldini NN, Fini M, Giardino R, Calvo Guirado JL, Covani U. Xenograft versus extraction alone for ridge preservation after tooth removal: a clinical and histomorphometric study. J Periodontol. 2008 Aug;79(8):1370-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070628.
PMID: 18672985BACKGROUNDBarwacz, C. & Hernandez, M. (2013) Maximizing Esthetics of Fixed Interim Restorations via Direct Extrinsic Characterization. Journal of Cosmetic Dentistry 29, 122-131.
BACKGROUNDBarwacz CA, Pantzlaff E, Allareddy V, Avila-Ortiz G. Graduate Periodontics Programs' Integration of Implant Provisionalization in Core Curricula: Implementation of CODA Standard 4-10.2.d. J Dent Educ. 2017 Jun;81(6):696-706. doi: 10.21815/JDE.016.033.
PMID: 28572416BACKGROUNDBarwacz CA, Stanford CM, Diehl UA, Cooper LF, Feine J, McGuire M, Scheyer ET. Pink Esthetic Score Outcomes Around Three Implant-Abutment Configurations: 3-Year Results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Sep/Oct;33(5):1126-1135. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6659.
PMID: 30231101BACKGROUNDCooper LF, Reside G, Stanford C, Barwacz C, Feine J, Nader SA, Scheyer T, McGuire M. Three-Year Prospective Randomized Comparative Assessment of Anterior Maxillary Single Implants with Different Abutment Interfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 Jan/Feb;34(1):150-158. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6810.
PMID: 30695089BACKGROUNDCooper LF, Tarnow D, Froum S, Moriarty J, De Kok IJ. Comparison of Marginal Bone Changes with Internal Conus and External Hexagon Design Implant Systems: A Prospective, Randomized Study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2016 Sep-Oct;36(5):631-42. doi: 10.11607/prd.2433.
PMID: 27560668BACKGROUNDCrespi R, Cappare P, Crespi G, Gastaldi G, Romanos GE, Gherlone E. Tissue Remodeling in Immediate Versus Delayed Prosthetic Restoration in Fresh Socket Implants in the Esthetic Zone: Four-Year Follow-up. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018;38(Suppl):s97-s103. doi: 10.11607/prd.3123. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
PMID: 29513776BACKGROUNDDe Rouck T, Collys K, Wyn I, Cosyn J. Instant provisionalization of immediate single-tooth implants is essential to optimize esthetic treatment outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Jun;20(6):566-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01674.x. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
PMID: 19302238BACKGROUNDFurhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, Haas R, Mailath G, Watzek G. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Dec;16(6):639-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01193.x.
PMID: 16307569BACKGROUNDHeberer S, Al-Chawaf B, Hildebrand D, Nelson JJ, Nelson K. Histomorphometric analysis of extraction sockets augmented with Bio-Oss Collagen after a 6-week healing period: a prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Dec;19(12):1219-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01617.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 19040436BACKGROUNDHeinemann F, Hasan I, Schwahn C, Bourauel C, Mundt T. Bone level change of extraction sockets with Bio-Oss collagen and implant placement: a clinical study. Ann Anat. 2012 Nov;194(6):508-12. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2011.11.012. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
PMID: 22244384BACKGROUNDIasella JM, Greenwell H, Miller RL, Hill M, Drisko C, Bohra AA, Scheetz JP. Ridge preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development: a clinical and histologic study in humans. J Periodontol. 2003 Jul;74(7):990-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.7.990.
PMID: 12931761BACKGROUNDJung RE, Philipp A, Annen BM, Signorelli L, Thoma DS, Hammerle CH, Attin T, Schmidlin P. Radiographic evaluation of different techniques for ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Jan;40(1):90-8. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12027. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
PMID: 23163915BACKGROUNDKan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Lozada J. Immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: 1-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 Jan-Feb;18(1):31-9.
PMID: 12608666BACKGROUNDKan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Umezu K, Kois JC. Dimensions of peri-implant mucosa: an evaluation of maxillary anterior single implants in humans. J Periodontol. 2003 Apr;74(4):557-62. doi: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.4.557.
PMID: 12747463BACKGROUNDLekovic V, Kenney EB, Weinlaender M, Han T, Klokkevold P, Nedic M, Orsini M. A bone regenerative approach to alveolar ridge maintenance following tooth extraction. Report of 10 cases. J Periodontol. 1997 Jun;68(6):563-70. doi: 10.1902/jop.1997.68.6.563.
PMID: 9203100BACKGROUNDNart J, Barallat L, Jimenez D, Mestres J, Gomez A, Carrasco MA, Violant D, Ruiz-Magaz V. Radiographic and histological evaluation of deproteinized bovine bone mineral vs. deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen in ridge preservation. A randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Jul;28(7):840-848. doi: 10.1111/clr.12889. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
PMID: 27335267BACKGROUNDNevins M, Camelo M, De Paoli S, Friedland B, Schenk RK, Parma-Benfenati S, Simion M, Tinti C, Wagenberg B. A study of the fate of the buccal wall of extraction sockets of teeth with prominent roots. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006 Feb;26(1):19-29.
PMID: 16515093BACKGROUNDNoelken R, Oberhansl F, Kunkel M, Wagner W. Immediately provisionalized OsseoSpeed() Profile implants inserted into extraction sockets: 3-year results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Jun;27(6):744-9. doi: 10.1111/clr.12651. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
PMID: 26300062BACKGROUNDPonsi J, Lahti S, Rissanen H, Oikarinen K. Change in subjective oral health after single dental implant treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 May-Jun;26(3):571-7.
PMID: 21691604BACKGROUNDRaes F, Cooper LF, Tarrida LG, Vandromme H, De Bruyn H. A case-control study assessing oral-health-related quality of life after immediately loaded single implants in healed alveolar ridges or extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 May;23(5):602-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02178.x. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
PMID: 21504481BACKGROUNDRoccuzzo M, Gaudioso L, Lungo M, Dalmasso P. Surgical therapy of single peri-implantitis intrabony defects, by means of deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen. J Clin Periodontol. 2016 Mar;43(3):311-8. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12516. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
PMID: 26800389BACKGROUNDScheyer ET, Heard R, Janakievski J, Mandelaris G, Nevins ML, Pickering SR, Richardson CR, Pope B, Toback G, Velasquez D, Nagursky H. A randomized, controlled, multicentre clinical trial of post-extraction alveolar ridge preservation. J Clin Periodontol. 2016 Dec;43(12):1188-1199. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12623. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
PMID: 27617409BACKGROUNDSpyropoulou PE, Razzoog M, Sierraalta M. Restoring implants in the esthetic zone after sculpting and capturing the periimplant tissues in rest position: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Dec;102(6):345-7. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60189-X.
PMID: 19961991BACKGROUNDStanford CM, Barwacz C, Raes S, De Bruyn H, Cecchinato D, Bittner N, Brandt J. Multicenter Clinical Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluation of an Implant System Designed for Enhanced Primary Stability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jul-Aug;31(4):906-15. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4869.
PMID: 27447160BACKGROUNDStrietzel FP, Neumann K, Hertel M. Impact of platform switching on marginal peri-implant bone-level changes. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Mar;26(3):342-58. doi: 10.1111/clr.12339. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
PMID: 24438506BACKGROUNDSu H, Gonzalez-Martin O, Weisgold A, Lee E. Considerations of implant abutment and crown contour: critical contour and subcritical contour. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010 Aug;30(4):335-43.
PMID: 20664835BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Chris Barwacz
- Organization
- University of Iowa
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christopher Barwacz, DDS
University of Iowa
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 31, 2020
First Posted
February 5, 2020
Study Start
January 29, 2020
Primary Completion
January 30, 2024
Study Completion
January 30, 2024
Last Updated
October 3, 2024
Results First Posted
October 3, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share