NCT03520101

Brief Summary

The treatment with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) of patients with small (≤23mm) surgical bioprostheses remains a challenge due to the increased transvalvular residual gradients and high rates of severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) following the procedure.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
102

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
50mo left

Started May 2017

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress69%
May 2017May 2030

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 8, 2017

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 10, 2017

Completed
12 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 9, 2018

Completed
3.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 22, 2022

Completed
8.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 31, 2030

Expected
Last Updated

March 27, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

4.8 years

First QC Date

May 8, 2017

Last Update Submit

March 23, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Rate of prothesis-patient mismatch (PPM) (valve performance)

    Severe prothesis-patient mismatch (PPM) (defined as an index aortic valve area ≤0.65 cm2/m2) and/or moderate-severe aortic regurgitation (AR) (VARC-2 definition).

    30 days

  • Residual transvalvular gradient

    Residual (maximal and mean) transvalvular gradient.

    30 days

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Transvalvular gradient.

    1-year and yearly thereafter up to 10-year follow-up

  • Valve performance : Moderate or severe PPM moderate-severe AR at 30 days and 1 year.

    30 days, 1 year and yearly thereafter up to 10-year follow-up

  • Combined endpoints: Moderate-severe AR or severe PPM at 1-year follow-up.

    1 year and yearly thereafter up to 10-year follow-up

  • Clinical safety endpoints

    30 days, 1 year and yearly thereafter up to 10-year follow-up

  • Exercise capacity

    30 days, 1 year and yearly thereafter up to 10-year follow-up

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

SAPIEN

OTHER

Following the Heart Team's decision to proceed with a TAVI-ViV procedure, patients will received an Edwards (SAPIEN XT or SAPIEN 3) valve.

Procedure: TAVI_ViV procedure with Edwards valve

COREVALVE

OTHER

Following the Heart Team's decision to proceed with a TAVI-ViV procedure, patients will received the CoreValve Evolut R or Evolut PRO valve system.

Procedure: TAVI_ViV procedure with CoreValve system

Interventions

The TAVR procedure will be performed following the standards of each participating center. No restriction or specific recommendation will be given regarding the approach, general vs. local anesthesia, imaging guidance during the TAVI procedure, and post-procedural TAVI management. The decision for selecting either a 20 or 23mm Edwards valve will be based on 3D CT measurements of the mean inner diameter of the surgical aortic bioprosthesis. A 23mm Sapien 3 valve will be recommended if the inner diameter is \>18 mm, and a 20mm valve will be selected if the mean inner diameter is ≤18 mm.

SAPIEN

The TAVR procedure will be performed following the standards of each participating center. No restriction or specific recommendation will be given regarding the approach, general vs. local anesthesia, imaging guidance during the TAVI procedure, and post-procedural TAVI management. A 23mm valve will be recommended in all patients randomized to the self-expanding CoreValve Evolut R system.

COREVALVE

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with surgical aortic bioprosthetic dysfunction defined as severe aortic stenosis and/or regurgitation approved for a ViV procedure by the Heart Team
  • Stented surgical valves.
  • Small (≤23mm) surgical valve

You may not qualify if:

  • \- Stentless or sutureless surgical valves

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

IUCPQ

Québec, Quebec, G1V 4G5, Canada

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Cepas-Guillen P, Abbas AE, Serra V, Vilalta V, Nombela-Franco L, Regueiro A, Al-Azizi KM, Iskander A, Conradi L, Forcillo J, Lilly S, Calabuig A, Fernandez-Nofrerias E, Mohammadi S, Giuliani C, Pelletier-Beaumont E, Pibarot P, Rodes-Cabau J. Balloon- Versus Self-Expanding Transcatheter Valves for Failed Small Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: 3-Year Results of the LYTEN Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2026 Mar;19(3):e016255. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.016255. Epub 2026 Feb 2.

  • Nuche J, Abbas AE, Serra V, Vilalta V, Nombela-Franco L, Regueiro A, Al-Azizi KM, Iskander A, Conradi L, Forcillo J, Lilly S, Calabuig A, Fernandez-Nofrerias E, Mohammadi S, Giuliani C, Pelletier-Beaumont E, Pibarot P, Rodes-Cabau J. Balloon- vs Self-Expanding Transcatheter Valves for Failed Small Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: 1-Year Results of the LYTEN Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Dec 25;16(24):2999-3012. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.10.028. Epub 2023 Oct 23.

  • Rodes-Cabau J, Abbas AE, Serra V, Vilalta V, Nombela-Franco L, Regueiro A, Al-Azizi KM, Iskander A, Conradi L, Forcillo J, Lilly S, Calabuig A, Fernandez-Nofrerias E, Mohammadi S, Panagides V, Pelletier-Beaumont E, Pibarot P. Balloon- vs Self-Expanding Valve Systems for Failed Small Surgical Aortic Valve Bioprostheses. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Aug 16;80(7):681-693. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.05.005. Epub 2022 May 18.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Aortic Valve StenosisAortic Valve InsufficiencyProsthesis Failure

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Aortic Valve DiseaseHeart Valve DiseasesHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVentricular Outflow ObstructionPostoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Josep Rodés-Cabau, MD

    Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, University Laval

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Prospective, multicenter, randomized trial including patients with surgical aortic bioprosthetic dysfunction in the presence of a small stented surgical valve. Patients will be randomized to either receive an Edwards (SAPIEN XT or SAPIEN 3) valve or a Core Valve Evolut R or Evolut PRO system.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2017

First Posted

May 9, 2018

Study Start

May 10, 2017

Primary Completion

February 22, 2022

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2030

Last Updated

March 27, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Locations