NCT03519087

Brief Summary

The investigators aim to understand how interdisciplinary care influences decisions, expectations, and outcomes for patients with non-arthritic hip disease (NAHD). Patients presenting to the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (OSUWMC) Hip Preservation Clinic will be approached for participation. All participants will proceed with their scheduled, standard-care physician evaluation. Participants without NAHD will be excluded. Participants will then be randomized to receive a same-day physical therapist (PT) evaluation. This PT evaluation is not a standard-care practice in the clinic, this was added for research. All participants will complete expectation surveys before and after their evaluation(s). The clinicians will discuss their recommended plan with the patient and the patient will record a final treatment decision and outcome expectations. Participants will then be randomized to either receive posture and movement training (PMT) for 3 weeks or undergo a 3-week wait period. All participants will be required to withhold any treatment during this 3-week period (except PMT in the PMT group). The 3-week wait period for the no-PMT group is aligned with current clinical processes for time from physician evaluation to start of treatment. All participants may proceed with any further interventions (including PMT) after the 3-week period, but none will be provided/required as part of research. Patient-reported outcomes and clinical tests will be recorded before and after the 3-week period, and 3 and 6 months later. Adding a PT evaluation to the physician visit provides no additional risk because the PT evaluation includes similar clinical tests to the physician and movement analysis during tasks participants complete during daily life. Clinical tests before/after the 3-week intervention period may produce muscle soreness that should resolve within 2 days. Understanding how interdisciplinary care influences expectations and outcomes can inform clinicians regarding the effectiveness of interdisciplinary collaboration.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
112

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 27, 2018

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 27, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 8, 2018

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 31, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 31, 2019

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 6, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

May 6, 2020

Status Verified

May 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

March 27, 2018

Results QC Date

October 8, 2019

Last Update Submit

May 5, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Treatment Plan

    Participants will indicate their planned treatment(s)

    Post-evaluation, same-day (approximately 5-10min after evaluation)

  • Decisional Conflict

    Participants will report decisional conflict related to their treatment plan. Decisional conflict was measured using the Decisional Conflict Scale ranging from 0 (no conflict, better outcome) to 100 (high conflict, worse outcome).

    Pre-evaluation, 10min Post-evaluation

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Themes From Provider Interviews

    Pre-enrollment (2-7days before patient participant recruitment began), Post-enrollment (1-7 days after patient participant recruitment ended)

  • Participant Protocol Opinions

    20min post-evaluation, 4 weeks post-evaluation

  • Decisional Conflict

    10min post-evaluation, 4-week laboratory visit

  • Patient-reported Hip Function

    10min post-evaluation, 4-week laboratory visit

  • Movement Mechanics

    Baseline laboratory visit, 4-week laboratory visit

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Decisional Regret

    Day of enrollment, after all evaluations are complete

  • Decisional Regret

    4 weeks

  • Changes in Hip Strength

    4 weeks

Study Arms (5)

Interdisciplinary Evaluation

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will receive an Interdisciplinary Evaluation for Nonarthritic Hip Disease from a hip arthroscopist, followed by an examination from a physical therapist, and then will participate in a shared decision-making process with both providers to determine a plan of care.

Other: Interdisciplinary Evaluation for Nonarthritic Hip Disease

Standard Evaluation

NO INTERVENTION

Participants will receive a standard-of-care evaluation from a hip arthroscopist who will then determine the plan of care with the participant.

Posture and Movement Training

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will receive six training sessions with a physical therapist over a 3-week period.

Other: Posture and Movement Training

3-week Wait Period

NO INTERVENTION

Participants will undergo a 3-week wait period. They will be instructed to not receive any treatment (e.g. chiropractic services, physical therapy, medication, surgery, injections) for their hip symptoms during this time.

Observational Arm

OTHER

Participants who refuse randomization to receive posture and movement training may continue participation in an observational group. These participants complete the same baseline and follow-up testing but proceed with their treatment-of-choice during the 3-week intervention period.

Other: Treatment-of-choice

Interventions

The hip arthroscopist will conduct his or her standard-care evaluation including subjective interview, patient history, imaging, and physical examination. The physical therapist will conduct an assessment of posture and movement during sitting, standing, squatting, and walking. After providers discuss their findings, they will discuss the plan of care with the participant.

Interdisciplinary Evaluation

Physical therapists will lead participants through an intervention protocol to normalize seated and standing posture and function movement. Verbal, visual, and tactile cues, along with strengthening exercises will be provided to train posture and movement.

Also known as: Movement Pattern Training
Posture and Movement Training

Participants may proceed with any treatment-of-choice, which may or may not have been recommended by their health care provider(s). Treatments will be recorded, but not controlled.

Also known as: Standard care
Observational Arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Over 18 years old NAHD diagnosis

You may not qualify if:

  • Osteoporosis or rheumatoid arthritis
  • Systemic health condition
  • Legal representative required for treatment decisions
  • Bilateral symptoms
  • Current spine, hip, knee, or ankle surgery or major injury\*
  • Pregnancy
  • Total hip arthroplasty candidate (Tönnis grade \> 2)
  • Periacetabular osteotomy candidate (lateral center edge angle\<20, anterior center edge angle\<18, acetabular index \>10)
  • Participants with history of spine, hip, knee, or ankle surgery or major injury will be evaluated by the physician to determine appropriateness for evaluation (and treatment) by a physical therapist

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Jameson Crane Sports Medicine Institute

Columbus, Ohio, 43202, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

PostureStandard of Care

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Musculoskeletal Physiological PhenomenaMusculoskeletal and Neural Physiological PhenomenaQuality Indicators, Health CareQuality of Health CareHealth Services AdministrationHealth Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation

Limitations and Caveats

Seventy-eight (78) participants were included from the 15-month recruitment period (81% of the target n=96). Randomization for interdisciplinary vs. standard evaluation had to occur before physician evaluation, modified from the original protocol.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Stephanie Di Stasi
Organization
The Ohio State University

Study Officials

  • Stephanie Di Stasi, PhD, PT

    Ohio State University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 27, 2018

First Posted

May 8, 2018

Study Start

February 27, 2018

Primary Completion

May 31, 2019

Study Completion

May 31, 2019

Last Updated

May 6, 2020

Results First Posted

May 6, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

At this time, our IPD will be shared with researchers listed on the funding mechanisms for this project. When submitting manuscripts, IPD will be available upon request.

Locations