NCT03517670

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the tolerance of intravenous milrinone combined to the current standard treatment for cerebral vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorrhage. Assessment of IV milrinone safety in this setting is mandatory before the conduction of a large study assessing its effectiveness.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 23, 2018

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 7, 2018

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 31, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 31, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 31, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

March 3, 2022

Status Verified

March 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

Same day

First QC Date

April 23, 2018

Last Update Submit

March 2, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Cerebral vasospasmSubarachnoid hemorrhageMilrinoneHemodynamic tolerance

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Hemodynamic tolerance during treatment: defined by a stable mean blood pressure of 100-120

    A good hemodynamic tolerance is defined by a stable mean blood pressure of 100-120 mmHg without neither the need to decrease milrinone infusion rate below 0.5 g.kg-1.min-1 nor the need to increase norepinephrine above 1g.kg-1.min-1 Safety Issue: No

    At 6 months.

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Rhythmic tolerance: defined by the occurrence of arrhythmia prompting the initiation of

    Rhythmic tolerance will be assessed for the duration of treatment, which will be on average one month.Heart rate and rhythm will be measured continuously, but assessed for fluctuation outside the reference range daily (during the length of treatment).

  • Hematological tolerance: will be considered good if milrinone infusion was not interrupted

    Hematological tolerance will be assessed daily through measuring platelet count for the duration of treatment.

  • Milrinone efficiency on cerebral vasospasm

    Milrinone efficiency on cerebral vasospasm will be assessed for the duration of treatment, which will be on average one month. Mean velocity and the lindegard index will be initially measured at 0, 2, 12 and 24 hours; and subsequently daily.

  • Milrinone efficiency on patient-centered neurological outcome using the modified Rankin scale

    At 6 months.

Interventions

Rhythmic intolerance is defined by the occurrence of arrhythmia prompting the initiation of an antiarrhythmic medication and the need to decrease or even to stop the infusion of milrinone

Hematological tolerance will be considered good if milrinone infusion was not interrupted owing to the occurrence of thrombocytopenia

It will be assessed using ultrasound measurements of middle cerebral arteries velocities. A decrease of at least 20% of the mean velocity or of the Lindegaard index will be considered as a significant positive effect of the treatment (including milrinone).

Scored as follows: 0 = No symptoms, 1 = No significant disability. Able to perform all usual activities, despite certain symptoms, 2= Slight disability. Able to take care of his own affairs without assistance, but unable to carry out all previous activities, 3 = Moderate disability. Requires some help, but able to walk unassisted, 4 = Moderate severe disability. Unable to meet their own physical needs without help and unable to walk without help, 5 Severe disability. Needs constant care and attention, bedridden, incontinent, 6 = Death.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Primary Purpose: Treatment Study Phase: NA Intervention Model: Single group Number of Arms: 1 Masking: Open label Allocation: NA Study Endpoint Classification: Safety Enrollment: 60 participants

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects 18 years
  • Hospitalized in our intensive care unit
  • Subarachnoid hemorrhage proven on CT angiogram
  • Cerebral vasospasm proven on CT angiogram

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnant women
  • Minor
  • Major under guardianship

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

CHU Nantes

Nantes, 44000, France

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Vasospasm, IntracranialSubarachnoid Hemorrhage

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesIntracranial HemorrhagesHemorrhagePathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Julien CADIET, PH

    Nantes University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
6 Months
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2018

First Posted

May 7, 2018

Study Start

August 31, 2020

Primary Completion

August 31, 2020

Study Completion

August 31, 2020

Last Updated

March 3, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-03

Locations