Metacognitive Therapy for Social Anxiety in Youth
1 other identifier
interventional
5
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is a fear of social situations that involve interacting with other people. Although it can be very upsetting, there are ways to help people deal with it. This study aims to explore the use of a new treatment called Metacognitive Therapy (MCT) for social anxiety in children and teenagers. MCT is a one-to-one talking therapy which works by changing people's patterns of attention and thinking in social situations. By doing this, people with SAD can begin to feel more confident and less anxious when interacting with others. Findings suggests that MCT works well when treating adults who have social anxiety. However, this treatment has not yet been used with young people. This study hopes to explore whether MCT can help treat SAD in children and teenagers. This information will help us to plan larger studies in the future. People who would like to take part in this study will be asked to fill in some questionnaires once a week for at least 2 weeks and return these to the researcher in the post. Following this, they will be offered 8 weekly sessions of MCT at their local Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service. Each session will last for about 1 hour. This will involve talking to a clinician about how they think and feel when in social situations, and filling in some more questionnaires. This will allow us to see how their social anxiety changes week-by-week and whether this has improved by the end of treatment (week 8). 1-months after people have had their last session of MCT, they will be asked to complete and return a final set of questionnaires through the post. This will allow us to get a final measure of their social anxiety and see whether any changes in SAD have been maintained. Primary Questions:
- Is MCT a feasible and acceptable treatment for social anxiety disorder within a child and adolescent population?
- Is MCT associated with improvements in SAD symptoms and functioning? Secondary Questions:
- Are benefits associated with MCT replicable across subtypes of social anxiety disorder (general and specific)?
- Are any gains associated with MCT for social anxiety disorder maintained at 1 month follow up?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 19, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 2, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 10, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 9, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 11, 2019
CompletedApril 19, 2019
April 1, 2019
8 months
March 19, 2018
April 18, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory for Children (SPAI-C; Beidel et al., 1995)
A 26-item measure of social anxiety, assessing assertiveness, general conversation, physical and cognitive symptoms, avoidance and public performance.
Change in overall SPAI-C score from baseline to 8 weeks post-baseline (end of intervention)
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory for Children (SPAI-C; Beidel et al., 1995)
Change in overall SPAI-C score from baseline to 1 month follow-up
Revised Social Phobia Rating Scale (R-SPRS)
Change in R-SPRS scores from baseline to approximately 8 weeks post-baseline (end of intervention)
Revised Social Phobia Rating Scale (R-SPRS)
Change in R-SPRS scores from baseline to 1 month follow-up
Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS; Chorpita et al.,2000)
Weekly during baseline, once approximately 8 weeks post-baseline (end of the intervention), and once at 1 month follow-up
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ; Goodman, 2001)
Weekly during baseline, once approximately 8 weeks post-baseline (end of the intervention), and once at 1 month follow-up
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Metacognitive Therapy for Social Anxiety
OTHERExact sessional content of the MCT intervention is likely to involve attention training and situational attentional refocussing techniques, verbal reattribution strategies aimed to facilitate a reduction of self-processing strategies and to challenge metacognitive beliefs, and between-session tasks for participants to practice at home.
Interventions
The transdiagnostic Metacognitive model posits that psychological disorder stems from the activation of a perseverative thinking style called the CAS (Cognitive Attentional Syndrome). This has 3 key elements: worry/rumination, threat-focussed attention and unhelpful coping behaviours. Each of these elements results in extended cognitive responses to negative thoughts, prolonging negative emotions and maintaining an individual's sense of threat. The CAS arises from an individual's positive and negative metacognitive beliefs (beliefs about cognition). Metacognitive Therapy (MCT) aims to bring the CAS under control by modifying metacognitive beliefs and enabling individuals to develop new reactions to negative thoughts.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants must meet criteria for SAD on the ADIS-IV
- Participants must be aged between 13-17 years old at the time of consent
- SAD must be their primary presenting problem (generalised or specific subtype)
- Participants may or may not be taking medication for a mental health difficulty as long as this remains stable during the study
- Participants may or may not have received previous psychological intervention for SAD as long as this is not ongoing
You may not qualify if:
- They are aged 18 or above or under the age of 13 at the time of consent
- SAD is not their primary presenting problem
- They are currently undergoing other forms of psychological intervention for SAD or other mental health difficulties \[other interventions would need to be suspended for the duration of the study\]
- They have a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or a learning disability which would impair their ability to participate
- They are non-English speaking
- They are currently demonstrating a high level of risk to themselves or others
- Although participants may also experience low mood, this must not be severe enough to warrant treatment in its own right
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (MFT)
Manchester, Greater Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
Related Publications (11)
Beidel, D. C., Turner, S. M. & Fink, C. M. (1996). Assessment of Childhood Social Phobia: Construct, Convergent, and Discriminative Validity of the Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory for Children (SPAI-C). Psychological Assessment, 8(3), 235-240
BACKGROUNDWells, A. (2009). Metacognitive Therapy for Anxiety and Depression. New York: Guilford Press
BACKGROUNDEvidence Based Practice Unit (2012). Session Feedback Questionnaire. Retrieved from www.corc.uk.net, 22 September 2017
BACKGROUNDWells, A., & Matthews, G. (1994). Attention and Emotion: A clinical perspective. Hove UK: Erlbaum.
BACKGROUNDWells A, Matthews G. Modelling cognition in emotional disorder: the S-REF model. Behav Res Ther. 1996 Nov-Dec;34(11-12):881-8. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(96)00050-2.
PMID: 8990539BACKGROUNDWells, A. (1997). Cognitive Therapy of Anxiety Disorders: A Practice Manual and Conceptual Guide. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
BACKGROUNDNordahl, H. & Wells, A. (2017). Metacognitive Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder. Manuscript submitted for publication
BACKGROUNDSilverman, W. K. & Albano, A. M. (1996). The Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children for DSM-IV: Clinician Manual (Child and Parent Versions). Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX
BACKGROUNDChorpita BF, Yim L, Moffitt C, Umemoto LA, Francis SE. Assessment of symptoms of DSM-IV anxiety and depression in children: a revised child anxiety and depression scale. Behav Res Ther. 2000 Aug;38(8):835-55. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00130-8.
PMID: 10937431BACKGROUNDGoodman R. Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001 Nov;40(11):1337-45. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200111000-00015.
PMID: 11699809BACKGROUNDDevilly GJ, Borkovec TD. Psychometric properties of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2000 Jun;31(2):73-86. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7916(00)00012-4.
PMID: 11132119BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Adrian Wells
The University of Manchester
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Clinical and Experimental Psychopathology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 19, 2018
First Posted
May 2, 2018
Study Start
August 10, 2018
Primary Completion
April 9, 2019
Study Completion
April 11, 2019
Last Updated
April 19, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Time Frame
- Data will be made available within 12 months of study completion
- Access Criteria
- Anonymised data will be made available on request (to the Principle Investigator) after publication.
De-identified individual participant data for all primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available