Perfusion Assessment With Contrast-Enhanced EUS in Locally Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
PEACE
Changes in Tumor Vascularity Depicted by Contrast-Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasonography as a Predictor of Treatment Efficacy in Patients With Locally Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer (PEACE)
1 other identifier
observational
200
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer have a poor prognosis.The analysis of prognostic factors before treatment may be helpful in selecting appropriate candidates for chemotherapy and determining treatment strategies. The aim of the PEACE study is to assess the vascularity of pancreatic malignant tumors using contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography and to clarify the prognostic value of tumor vascularity in patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started May 2018
Longer than P75 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 13, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2023
CompletedMay 1, 2018
April 1, 2018
4.8 years
February 13, 2018
April 29, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Change of Peak Enhancement (PE) from baseline to 2 months after the first course of treatment
PE represents a TIC analysis-derived parameter, obtained from post-processing of CE-EUS recordings with a commercially available software
baseline and 2 months after the first course of treatment
Change of Wash-in Area Under the Curve (Wi-AUC) from baseline to 2 months after the first course of treatment
Wi-AUC represents a TIC analysis-derived parameter, obtained from post-processing of CE-EUS recordings with a commercially available software
baseline and 2 months after the first course of treatment
change of Rise Time (RT) from baseline to 2 months after the first course of treatment
RT represents a TIC analysis-derived parameter, obtained from post-processing of CE-EUS recordings with a commercially available software
baseline and 2 months after the first course of treatment
change of mean Transit Time (mTT) from baseline to 2 months after the first course of treatment
mTT represents a TIC analysis-derived parameter, obtained from post-processing of CE-EUS recordings with a commercially available software
baseline and 2 months after the first course of treatment
Change of Time To Peak (TTP) from baseline to 2 months after the first course of treatment
TTP represents a TIC analysis-derived parameter, obtained from post-processing of CE-EUS recordings with a commercially available software
baseline and 2 months after the first course of treatment
Change of Wash-in Rate (WiR) from baseline to 2 months after the first course of treatment
Wir represents a TIC analysis-derived parameter, obtained from post-processing of CE-EUS recordings with a commercially available software
baseline and 2 months after the first course of treatment
Change of Wash-in Perfusion Index (WiPI) from baseline to 2 months after the first course of treatment
WiPI represents a TIC analysis-derived parameter, obtained from post-processing of CE-EUS recordings with a commercially available software
baseline and 2 months after the first course of treatment
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Overall survival
1 year
Progression-free survival
1 year
Tumor response to treatment
2 months after the first course of treatment
Study Arms (1)
Non-resectable pancreatic cancer
All patients with a suspicion of pancreatic masses will undergo EUS (including EUS-FNA for confirmation of diagnosis). A positive cytological diagnosis will be taken as a final proof of malignancy of the pancreas mass. The diagnoses obtained by EUS-FNA will be further verified during a clinical follow-up of at least 6 months. Both pancreatic adenocarcinomas and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors will be included. Endoscopic ultrasound (including fine needle aspiration for confirmation of diagnosis) with sequential contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound and elastography endoscopic ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography will be performed before and 2 months after the first course of treatment
Interventions
EUS will be performed before (including EUS-FNA for confirmation of diagnosis) and 2 months after the first course of treatment. * Protocol of EUS with EUS-FNA should include linear EUS instruments with complete examinations of the pancreas. * Tumor characteristics (echogenicity, echostructure, size) will be described as well as presence/absence of power Doppler signals. * EUS-FNA will be performed in all pancreatic masses with at least four passes.
CE-EUS will be performed during usual EUS examination before and 2 months after the first course of chemotherapy. * The starting point of the timer will be considered the moment of intravenous contrast injection (Sonovue 4.8 mL). * The whole movie (T0-T120s) will be recorded in a DICOM format on the embedded HDD of the ultrasound system, for later analysis. * All post-processing and computer analysis of digital movies will be performed within the coordinating IT Center using Vue-Box
EUS-EG will be performed during usual EUS examinations, before and 2-months after the first course of chemotherapy, with two movies of 10 seconds recorded on the embedded HDD * The region of interest for EUS-EG will be preferably larger than the focal mass. If the focal mass is larger than 3 cm, part of the mass will be included in the ROI, as well as the surrounding structures. Very large ROI for the elastography calculations will be avoided * The following pre-settings will be used in all centers: elastography color map 1, frame rejection 2, noise rejection 2, persistence 3, dynamic rage 4, smoothing 2, blend 50%. * SR and SH will be measured; with three measurements made and recorded on the embedded HDD.
* Contrast-enhanced computed tomography will be obtained before treatment to assess the local extension of the tumor, and presence of lymph nodes and distant metastases. * A template will be used to report the imaging results. * The template includes morphologic, arterial, venous, and extrapancreatic evaluations. * Contrast-enhanced computed tomography will be performed 2 months after the first course of chemotherapy, using the same template, in order to evaluate the tumor response. Tumor response will be assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST).
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of locally advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer (both adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumors will be included)
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 to 90 years old, men or women
- Signed informed consent for CE-EUS, EG-EUS and FNA biopsy
- The diagnosis of pancreatic cancer histologically confirmed by fine needle aspiration (FNA) with EUS
- Both pancreatic adenocarcinoma and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors will be included
- Unresectable, locally advanced and/or metastatic disease.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy
- Resectable pancreatic tumors
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiovalead
- Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlevcollaborator
- Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacycollaborator
- Central Military Hospital Bucharestcollaborator
- Ponderas Regina Maria Hospital Bucharestcollaborator
- Caritas-Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheimcollaborator
- Helios Kliniken Meiningencollaborator
- University of Santiago de Compostelacollaborator
- Hospital Märkisch Oderland Wriezen/ Strausbergcollaborator
- Institut Paoli-Calmettescollaborator
- Ospedale San Raffaelecollaborator
- University College London Hospitalscollaborator
- Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Trustcollaborator
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Centercollaborator
- Shengjing Hospitalcollaborator
- Asan Medical Centercollaborator
- Tokyo Medical Universitycollaborator
- Singapore General Hospitalcollaborator
Related Publications (10)
Lowenfels AB, Maisonneuve P. Epidemiology and risk factors for pancreatic cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006 Apr;20(2):197-209. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2005.10.001.
PMID: 16549324BACKGROUNDFolkman J. What is the evidence that tumors are angiogenesis dependent? J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990 Jan 3;82(1):4-6. doi: 10.1093/jnci/82.1.4. No abstract available.
PMID: 1688381BACKGROUNDFidler IJ, Ellis LM. The implications of angiogenesis for the biology and therapy of cancer metastasis. Cell. 1994 Oct 21;79(2):185-8. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90187-2. No abstract available.
PMID: 7525076BACKGROUNDIkeda N, Adachi M, Taki T, Huang C, Hashida H, Takabayashi A, Sho M, Nakajima Y, Kanehiro H, Hisanaga M, Nakano H, Miyake M. Prognostic significance of angiogenesis in human pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 1999 Mar;79(9-10):1553-63. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690248.
PMID: 10188906BACKGROUNDSaftoiu A, Vilmann P, Bhutani MS. The role of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Endosc Ultrasound. 2016 Nov-Dec;5(6):368-372. doi: 10.4103/2303-9027.190932.
PMID: 28000627BACKGROUNDYamashita Y, Ueda K, Itonaga M, Yoshida T, Maeda H, Maekita T, Iguchi M, Tamai H, Ichinose M, Kato J. Tumor vessel depiction with contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography predicts efficacy of chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer. Pancreas. 2013 Aug;42(6):990-5. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e31827fe94c.
PMID: 23851433BACKGROUNDSanchez MV, Varadarajulu S, Napoleon B. EUS contrast agents: what is available, how do they work, and are they effective? Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Feb;69(2 Suppl):S71-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.12.004. No abstract available.
PMID: 19179175BACKGROUNDZhang X, Galardi E, Duquette M, Lawler J, Parangi S. Antiangiogenic treatment with three thrombospondin-1 type 1 repeats versus gemcitabine in an orthotopic human pancreatic cancer model. Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Aug 1;11(15):5622-30. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0459.
PMID: 16061881BACKGROUNDChauhan VP, Martin JD, Liu H, Lacorre DA, Jain SR, Kozin SV, Stylianopoulos T, Mousa AS, Han X, Adstamongkonkul P, Popovic Z, Huang P, Bawendi MG, Boucher Y, Jain RK. Angiotensin inhibition enhances drug delivery and potentiates chemotherapy by decompressing tumour blood vessels. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2516. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3516.
PMID: 24084631BACKGROUNDTherasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, Verweij J, Van Glabbeke M, van Oosterom AT, Christian MC, Gwyther SG. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Feb 2;92(3):205-16. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205.
PMID: 10655437BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Adrian Saftoiu, MD PhD FASGE
University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 13, 2018
First Posted
May 1, 2018
Study Start
May 1, 2018
Primary Completion
February 1, 2023
Study Completion
February 1, 2023
Last Updated
May 1, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share