Medical-economic Evaluation of the Care of Refractory Ascites by Implantation of Alfapump® Device in Cirrhotic Patients
ARIAPUMP
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
10
Brief Summary
The hypothesis is that the Alfapump® strategy would be more effective in terms of QALYs generated , and that the cost of Alfapump® device and its implantation will be totally or partially offset by the reduction in the number of evacuating parentheses performed and the reduction in the number of complications in patients with refractory ascites awaiting liver transplantation or not. On the other hand, given the difference in the clinical profiles of these two populations (whether or not they are awaiting transplantation), these two populations will be study separately Evaluation of the medical-economic impact at 1 year of the two therapeutic strategies: implantation of Alfapump® versus repeated evacuating paracentesis in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites without scheduled liver transplantation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 8, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 24, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 17, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 25, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2027
ExpectedMarch 30, 2025
December 1, 2024
6.7 years
March 8, 2018
March 25, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evaluation of medical-economic impact at 1 year of 2 strategies: implantation of Alfapump® device versus repeated evacuating paracentesis (reference treatment) in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites without programmed liver transplantation.
Incremental cost-utility ratio (ICER) from societal perspective.
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Comparison of the clinical impact at 6 and 12 months of Alfapump® versus repeated evacuating paracentesis in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites WITHOUT programmed liver transplantation.
6 months and 1 year
Evaluation of the clinical impact at 6 and 12 months of Alfapump® versus repeated evacuating paracentesis in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites WITH programmed liver transplantation.
6 months and 1 year
Evaluation of the economic impact at 6 and 12 months of Alfapump® versus repeated evacuating paracentesis in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites WITH programmed liver transplantation.
6 months and 1 year
Evaluation of the clinical impact at 2 years of Alfapump® versus repeated evacuating paracentesis (prospective observational study).
2 years
Evaluation of the economic impact at 2 years of Alfapump® versus repeated evacuating paracentesis (prospective observational study).
2 years
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Alphapump
EXPERIMENTALAlfapump® device implantation under general anesthesia (30-45 minutes)
Ascites puncture
ACTIVE COMPARATORIterative paracentesis compensated for by albumin infusions in ambulatory care.
Interventions
Alfapump® device: a completely internalized medical device, implanted under the skin, which mobilizes ascites from the peritoneal cavity to the bladder where they are eliminated by the urinary tract. Medical device marked CE, used in the indication provided for marking
Hospitalizations for evacuating ascites are performed at least twice a month and can be up to 2 times a week. A clinical and biological examination is carried out at each visit.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient with refractory ascites who has had a minimum of 5 paracentesis in the last 3 months.
- Patient with contraindication to the application of a TIPS or who has expressed a refusal of the procedure or a non-functional TIPS
- Patient affiliated with or in receipt of social security
- Informed and written consent signed by the patient.
You may not qualify if:
- Local or systemic infection in the month preceding the procedure
- Hepatocellular carcinoma with palliative care
- MELD Score \> 18
- Child Pugh C Score \> 10
- Creatinine Clearance \< 50 ml/mn
- Digestive hemorrhage or episode of hepatic encephalopathy within two weeks prior to device insertion
- Contraindication to general anesthesia
- Contraindication to implant surgery of the device:
- Obstructive urological impairment
- Partitioning of ascites
- Coagulopathy
- Persons referred to in Articles L1121-5 to L1121-8 of the CSP (corresponding to all protected persons: pregnant woman, parturient, breastfeeding mother, person deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision, person subject to a legal protection measure).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (10)
Amiens-Picardie University Hospital
Amiens, 80000, France
Chu Angers
Angers, 49000, France
Jean MINJOZ Univesity Hospital
Besançon, 25000, France
Haut-Lévêque Hospital
Bordeaux, 33000, France
Beaujon Hospital
Clichy, 92110, France
Grenoble University Hospital
Grenoble, 38000, France
LA PITIE SALPETRIERE Univesity Hospital
Paris, 75013, France
Chu Poitiers
Poitiers, 86000, France
Chu Pontchaillou
Rennes, 35000, France
Toulouse University Hospital
Toulouse, 31000, France
Related Publications (6)
Bellot P, Welker MW, Soriano G, von Schaewen M, Appenrodt B, Wiest R, Whittaker S, Tzonev R, Handshiev S, Verslype C, Moench C, Zeuzem S, Sauerbruch T, Guarner C, Schott E, Johnson N, Petrov A, Katzarov K, Nevens F, Zapater P, Such J. Automated low flow pump system for the treatment of refractory ascites: a multi-center safety and efficacy study. J Hepatol. 2013 May;58(5):922-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.12.020. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
PMID: 23318604BACKGROUNDBureau C, Adebayo D, Chalret de Rieu M, Elkrief L, Valla D, Peck-Radosavljevic M, McCune A, Vargas V, Simon-Talero M, Cordoba J, Angeli P, Rosi S, MacDonald S, Malago M, Stepanova M, Younossi ZM, Trepte C, Watson R, Borisenko O, Sun S, Inhaber N, Jalan R. Alfapump(R) system vs. large volume paracentesis for refractory ascites: A multicenter randomized controlled study. J Hepatol. 2017 Nov;67(5):940-949. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
PMID: 28645737BACKGROUNDStirnimann G, Berg T, Spahr L, Zeuzem S, McPherson S, Lammert F, Storni F, Banz V, Babatz J, Vargas V, Geier A, Stallmach A, Engelmann C, Trepte C, Capel J, De Gottardi A. Treatment of refractory ascites with an automated low-flow ascites pump in patients with cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Nov;46(10):981-991. doi: 10.1111/apt.14331. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
PMID: 28940225BACKGROUNDSola E, Sole C, Gines P. Management of uninfected and infected ascites in cirrhosis. Liver Int. 2016 Jan;36 Suppl 1:109-15. doi: 10.1111/liv.13015.
PMID: 26725907BACKGROUNDThomas MN, Sauter GH, Gerbes AL, Stangl M, Schiergens TS, Angele M, Werner J, Guba M. Automated low flow pump system for the treatment of refractory ascites: a single-center experience. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 Dec;400(8):979-83. doi: 10.1007/s00423-015-1356-1. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
PMID: 26566989BACKGROUNDStepanova M, Nader F, Bureau C, Adebayo D, Elkrief L, Valla D, Peck-Radosavljevic M, McCune A, Vargas V, Simon-Talero M, Cordoba J, Angeli P, Rossi S, MacDonald S, Capel J, Jalan R, Younossi ZM. Patients with refractory ascites treated with alfapump(R) system have better health-related quality of life as compared to those treated with large volume paracentesis: the results of a multicenter randomized controlled study. Qual Life Res. 2018 Jun;27(6):1513-1520. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1813-8. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
PMID: 29460201BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marie-Noelle HILLERET, MD
University Hospital, Grenoble
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 8, 2018
First Posted
April 24, 2018
Study Start
July 17, 2018
Primary Completion
March 25, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 31, 2027
Last Updated
March 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share