What Factors Affect Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Efficacy?
What Are the Factors Affecting Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Efficacy in Breast Cancer? A Non-invasive in Vivo Study Using Specialist Magnetic Resonance (MR) Methods
3 other identifiers
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer affecting women. To treat locally advanced breast cancers, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is often carried out before surgery to reduce the tumour size to allow breast conservation surgery. However, treatment response for individual patients varies, where the tumour may not respond to treatment and the quality of patient care is compromised if the NACT treatment plan is not optimised. Therefore, the assessment of NACT efficacy is beneficial for the early identification of these patients and appropriate management of treatment. Breast tumours have unique features compared to healthy tissue, including abnormal tissue structure and biochemical composition. With NACT there are specific changes to such tumour features indicating tumour treatment response. The purpose of this study is to establish how the changes to breast tumour features following NACT treatment are seen in non-invasive imaging. This study will look at scans of breast tumours using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Changes to tissue structure will be measured by advanced diffusion MRI techniques and changes to tumour related biochemical substances will be measured by advanced magnetic resonance spectroscopy techniques. The investigators aim to assess if these techniques can provide information on the tumour treatment response following subsequent rounds of NACT treatment. In this longitudinal study, 25 patients undergoing NACT will be recruited for four repeated MRI investigations over the course of NACT treatment. Magnetic resonance (MR) measurements of tissue microstructure and biochemical composition will be compared against histological measurements and radiological assessments of treatment response. The study will recruit patients undergoing treatment at the NHS Grampian. This research is funded by Friends of ANCHOR, Tenovus Scotland Grampian and the NHS Grampian Endowment Research Fund.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 28, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 18, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 2, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2019
CompletedMay 3, 2018
April 1, 2018
1.1 years
March 28, 2018
May 2, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (20)
Baseline: Water diffusion probability density function (Full-Width-At-Half-Maximum, FWHM, units of micrometre)
The water diffusion probability density function will be quantified by the Full-Width-At-Half-Maximum with units of micrometre
Scan at pre-treatment baseline (Prior to start of Cycle 1, each cycle is 21 days)
Post Cycle 1: Water diffusion probability density function (Full-Width-At-Half-Maximum, FWHM, units of micrometre)
The water diffusion probability density function will be quantified by the Full-Width-At-Half-Maximum with units of micrometre
Scan at the end of Cycle 1 (Each cycle is 21 days)
Post Cycle 3: Water diffusion probability density function (Full-Width-At-Half-Maximum, FWHM, units of micrometre)
The water diffusion probability density function will be quantified by the Full-Width-At-Half-Maximum with units of micrometre
Scan at the end of Cycle 3 (Each cycle is 21 days)
Post Treatment: Water diffusion probability density function (Full-Width-At-Half-Maximum, FWHM, units of micrometre)
The water diffusion probability density function will be quantified by the Full-Width-At-Half-Maximum with units of micrometre
Scan at the end of Cycle 6 (Each cycle is 21 days)
Baseline: Water diffusivity (units of mm^2 /s)
Water diffusivity with units of mm\^2 /s
Scan at pre-treatment baseline (Prior to start of Cycle 1, each cycle is 21 days)
Post Cycle 1: Water diffusivity (units of mm^2 /s)
Water diffusivity with units of mm\^2 /s
Scan at the end of Cycle 1 (Each cycle is 21 days)
Post Cycle 3: Water diffusivity (units of mm^2 /s)
Water diffusivity with units of mm\^2 /s
Scan at the end of Cycle 3 (Each cycle is 21 days)
Post Treatment: Water diffusivity (units of mm^2 /s)
Water diffusivity with units of mm\^2 /s
Scan at the end of Cycle 6 (Each cycle is 21 days)
Baseline: Lactate Concentration (units of mM)
Lactate concentration with units of mM
Scan at pre-treatment baseline (Prior to start of Cycle 1, each cycle is 21 days)
Post Cycle 1: Lactate Concentration (units of mM)
Lactate concentration with units of mM
Scan at the end of Cycle 1 (Each cycle is 21 days)
Post Cycle 3: Lactate Concentration (units of mM)
Lactate concentration with units of mM
Scan at the end of Cycle 3 (Each cycle is 21 days)
Post Treatment: Lactate Concentration (units of mM)
Lactate concentration with units of mM
Scan at the end of Cycle 6 (Each cycle is 21 days)
Baseline: Lipid Peak Volume Ratio (Ratio Units)
Lipid peak volume ratio value with units of ratio
Scan at pre-treatment baseline (Prior to start of Cycle 1, each cycle is 21 days)
Post Cycle 1: Lipid Peak Volume Ratio (Ratio Units)
Lipid peak volume ratio value with units of ratio
Scan at the end of Cycle 1 (Each cycle is 21 days)
Post Cycle 3: Lipid Peak Volume Ratio (Ratio Units)
Lipid peak volume ratio value with units of ratio
Scan at the end of Cycle 3 (Each cycle is 21 days)
Post Treatment: Lipid Peak Volume Ratio (Ratio Units)
Lipid peak volume ratio value with units of ratio
Scan at the end of Cycle 6 (Each cycle is 21 days)
Baseline: Fat Fraction (units of %)
Fat Fraction with units of %
Scan at pre-treatment baseline (Prior to start of Cycle 1, each cycle is 21 days)
Post Cycle 1: Fat Fraction (units of %)
Fat Fraction with units of %
Scan at the end of Cycle 1 (Each cycle is 21 days)
Post Cycle 3: Fat Fraction (units of %)
Fat Fraction with units of %
Scan at the end of Cycle 3 (Each cycle is 21 days)
Post Treatment: Fat Fraction (units of %)
Fat Fraction with units of %
Scan at the end of Cycle 6 (Each cycle is 21 days)
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Core Biopsy Tumour Tissue: Ki-67 Staining Percentage (units of %)
Pre-treatment baseline biopsy (Taken prior to start of Cycle 1, each cycle is 21 days). Assessed following completion of treatment cycles and the routine reporting of core biopsy and excised tissue samples.
Excised Tumour Tissue: Ki-67 Staining Percentage (units of %)
Post-treatment surgery excision (Post Cycle 6, each cycle is 21 days). Assessed following the completion of routine pathological reporting of the excised tissue.
Core Biopsy Tumour Tissue: Serotonin Staining Score (arbitrary units)
Pre-treatment baseline biopsy (Taken prior to start of Cycle 1, each cycle is 21 days). Assessed following completion of treatment cycles and the routine reporting of core biopsy and excised tissue samples.
Excised Tumour Tissue: Serotonin Staining Score (arbitrary units)
Post-treatment surgery excision (Post Cycle 6, each cycle is 21 days). Assessed following the completion of routine pathological reporting of the excised tissue.
Core Biopsy Tumour Tissue: Cellularity (units of %)
Pre-treatment baseline biopsy (Taken prior to start of Cycle 1, each cycle is 21 days). Assessed following completion of treatment cycles and the routine reporting of core biopsy and excised tissue samples.
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Single Arm
EXPERIMENTAL25 patients with pathologically confirmed invasive breast cancer who will undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment (NACT) and surgery will be recruited. During the study, patients will receive the standard care and the current study will not alter the care plan offered to them. All patients in the single arm will undergo 4 magnetic resonance imaging scan sessions. Histopathological analysis will be performed on the core biopsy and tumour tissue removed in surgery. Health questionnaire will be completed by each patient.
Interventions
Patients will undergo 4 MRI sessions during NACT treatment. The first scan will take place at treatment baseline before their first cycle of NACT treatment. The second scan will take place following the first treatment cycle prior to the second treatment cycle. Likewise, the third and last scan will take place after the third treatment cycle and sixth (final) treatment cycle prior to surgery. MRI scan sessions will be composed of research scans including diffusion and lipid profiling MR imaging methods and MR spectroscopy (MRS) methods.
Study specific analysis will be performed on the core biopsy and tissue removed in surgery following the completion of NACT treatment. Standard routine histological analysis will be performed, as well as study specific analysis for immunostaining, grading and slide scan imaging for measurement of cellularity markers.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with pathologically confirmed invasive breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery.
You may not qualify if:
- Condition to contradictive to MRI investigation with contrast agent (poor renal function, contrast agent allergy, metal implants or pace maker).
- Started hormone or chemotherapy treatment before recruitment.
- Undergoing treatment for concurrent cancer diagnosis.
- Marker coil contradictive to MRI investigation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Aberdeenlead
- NHS Grampiancollaborator
Study Sites (1)
NHS Grampian
Aberdeen, Aberdeenshire, AB25 2ZD, United Kingdom
Related Publications (13)
Lee MC, Newman LA. Management of patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Surg Clin North Am. 2007 Apr;87(2):379-98, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2007.01.012.
PMID: 17498533BACKGROUNDLuangdilok S, Samarnthai N, Korphaisarn K. Association between Pathological Complete Response and Outcome Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Patients. J Breast Cancer. 2014 Dec;17(4):376-85. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2014.17.4.376. Epub 2014 Dec 26.
PMID: 25548587BACKGROUNDGraham LJ, Shupe MP, Schneble EJ, Flynt FL, Clemenshaw MN, Kirkpatrick AD, Gallagher C, Nissan A, Henry L, Stojadinovic A, Peoples GE, Shumway NM. Current approaches and challenges in monitoring treatment responses in breast cancer. J Cancer. 2014 Jan 5;5(1):58-68. doi: 10.7150/jca.7047.
PMID: 24396498BACKGROUNDDanishad KK, Sharma U, Sah RG, Seenu V, Parshad R, Jagannathan NR. Assessment of therapeutic response of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) monitored using sequential magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI). NMR Biomed. 2010 Apr;23(3):233-41. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1436.
PMID: 20175134BACKGROUNDWoodhams R, Kakita S, Hata H, Iwabuchi K, Kuranami M, Gautam S, Hatabu H, Kan S, Mountford C. Identification of residual breast carcinoma following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: diffusion-weighted imaging--comparison with contrast-enhanced MR imaging and pathologic findings. Radiology. 2010 Feb;254(2):357-66. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2542090405.
PMID: 20093508BACKGROUNDWalenta S, Mueller-Klieser WF. Lactate: mirror and motor of tumor malignancy. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2004 Jul;14(3):267-74. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2004.04.004.
PMID: 15254870BACKGROUNDCarmona-Fontaine C, Bucci V, Akkari L, Deforet M, Joyce JA, Xavier JB. Emergence of spatial structure in the tumor microenvironment due to the Warburg effect. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Nov 26;110(48):19402-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1311939110. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
PMID: 24218566BACKGROUNDBolan PJ, Meisamy S, Baker EH, Lin J, Emory T, Nelson M, Everson LI, Yee D, Garwood M. In vivo quantification of choline compounds in the breast with 1H MR spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med. 2003 Dec;50(6):1134-43. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10654.
PMID: 14648561BACKGROUNDBaik HM, Su MY, Yu H, Mehta R, Nalcioglu O. Quantification of choline-containing compounds in malignant breast tumors by 1H MR spectroscopy using water as an internal reference at 1.5 T. MAGMA. 2006 May;19(2):96-104. doi: 10.1007/s10334-006-0032-4. Epub 2006 May 9.
PMID: 16779565BACKGROUNDHe Q, Shkarin P, Hooley RJ, Lannin DR, Weinreb JC, Bossuyt VI. In vivo MR spectroscopic imaging of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) in healthy and cancerous breast tissues by selective multiple-quantum coherence transfer (Sel-MQC): a preliminary study. Magn Reson Med. 2007 Dec;58(6):1079-85. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21335.
PMID: 17969083BACKGROUNDNaressi A, Couturier C, Castang I, de Beer R, Graveron-Demilly D. Java-based graphical user interface for MRUI, a software package for quantitation of in vivo/medical magnetic resonance spectroscopy signals. Comput Biol Med. 2001 Jul;31(4):269-86. doi: 10.1016/s0010-4825(01)00006-3.
PMID: 11334636BACKGROUNDYamada I, Hikishima K, Miyasaka N, Tokairin Y, Ito E, Kawano T, Kobayashi D, Eishi Y, Okano H. Esophageal carcinoma: Evaluation with q-space diffusion-weighted MR imaging ex vivo. Magn Reson Med. 2015 Jun;73(6):2262-73. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25334. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
PMID: 24947492BACKGROUNDCheung SM, Wu WS, Senn N, Sharma R, McGoldrick T, Gagliardi T, Husain E, Masannat Y, He J. Towards detection of early response in neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer using Bayesian intravoxel incoherent motion. Front Oncol. 2023 Dec 6;13:1277556. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1277556. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 38125950DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Jiabao He, PhD
University of Aberdeen
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nicholas Senn, MPhys
University of Aberdeen
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Single group with one arm and no masking.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 28, 2018
First Posted
April 18, 2018
Study Start
May 2, 2018
Primary Completion
June 1, 2019
Study Completion
June 1, 2019
Last Updated
May 3, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share