NCT03501394

Brief Summary

Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer affecting women. To treat locally advanced breast cancers, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is often carried out before surgery to reduce the tumour size to allow breast conservation surgery. However, treatment response for individual patients varies, where the tumour may not respond to treatment and the quality of patient care is compromised if the NACT treatment plan is not optimised. Therefore, the assessment of NACT efficacy is beneficial for the early identification of these patients and appropriate management of treatment. Breast tumours have unique features compared to healthy tissue, including abnormal tissue structure and biochemical composition. With NACT there are specific changes to such tumour features indicating tumour treatment response. The purpose of this study is to establish how the changes to breast tumour features following NACT treatment are seen in non-invasive imaging. This study will look at scans of breast tumours using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Changes to tissue structure will be measured by advanced diffusion MRI techniques and changes to tumour related biochemical substances will be measured by advanced magnetic resonance spectroscopy techniques. The investigators aim to assess if these techniques can provide information on the tumour treatment response following subsequent rounds of NACT treatment. In this longitudinal study, 25 patients undergoing NACT will be recruited for four repeated MRI investigations over the course of NACT treatment. Magnetic resonance (MR) measurements of tissue microstructure and biochemical composition will be compared against histological measurements and radiological assessments of treatment response. The study will recruit patients undergoing treatment at the NHS Grampian. This research is funded by Friends of ANCHOR, Tenovus Scotland Grampian and the NHS Grampian Endowment Research Fund.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
25

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 28, 2018

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 18, 2018

Completed
14 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 2, 2018

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

May 3, 2018

Status Verified

April 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

March 28, 2018

Last Update Submit

May 2, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (20)

  • Baseline: Water diffusion probability density function (Full-Width-At-Half-Maximum, FWHM, units of micrometre)

    The water diffusion probability density function will be quantified by the Full-Width-At-Half-Maximum with units of micrometre

    Scan at pre-treatment baseline (Prior to start of Cycle 1, each cycle is 21 days)

  • Post Cycle 1: Water diffusion probability density function (Full-Width-At-Half-Maximum, FWHM, units of micrometre)

    The water diffusion probability density function will be quantified by the Full-Width-At-Half-Maximum with units of micrometre

    Scan at the end of Cycle 1 (Each cycle is 21 days)

  • Post Cycle 3: Water diffusion probability density function (Full-Width-At-Half-Maximum, FWHM, units of micrometre)

    The water diffusion probability density function will be quantified by the Full-Width-At-Half-Maximum with units of micrometre

    Scan at the end of Cycle 3 (Each cycle is 21 days)

  • Post Treatment: Water diffusion probability density function (Full-Width-At-Half-Maximum, FWHM, units of micrometre)

    The water diffusion probability density function will be quantified by the Full-Width-At-Half-Maximum with units of micrometre

    Scan at the end of Cycle 6 (Each cycle is 21 days)

  • Baseline: Water diffusivity (units of mm^2 /s)

    Water diffusivity with units of mm\^2 /s

    Scan at pre-treatment baseline (Prior to start of Cycle 1, each cycle is 21 days)

  • Post Cycle 1: Water diffusivity (units of mm^2 /s)

    Water diffusivity with units of mm\^2 /s

    Scan at the end of Cycle 1 (Each cycle is 21 days)

  • Post Cycle 3: Water diffusivity (units of mm^2 /s)

    Water diffusivity with units of mm\^2 /s

    Scan at the end of Cycle 3 (Each cycle is 21 days)

  • Post Treatment: Water diffusivity (units of mm^2 /s)

    Water diffusivity with units of mm\^2 /s

    Scan at the end of Cycle 6 (Each cycle is 21 days)

  • Baseline: Lactate Concentration (units of mM)

    Lactate concentration with units of mM

    Scan at pre-treatment baseline (Prior to start of Cycle 1, each cycle is 21 days)

  • Post Cycle 1: Lactate Concentration (units of mM)

    Lactate concentration with units of mM

    Scan at the end of Cycle 1 (Each cycle is 21 days)

  • Post Cycle 3: Lactate Concentration (units of mM)

    Lactate concentration with units of mM

    Scan at the end of Cycle 3 (Each cycle is 21 days)

  • Post Treatment: Lactate Concentration (units of mM)

    Lactate concentration with units of mM

    Scan at the end of Cycle 6 (Each cycle is 21 days)

  • Baseline: Lipid Peak Volume Ratio (Ratio Units)

    Lipid peak volume ratio value with units of ratio

    Scan at pre-treatment baseline (Prior to start of Cycle 1, each cycle is 21 days)

  • Post Cycle 1: Lipid Peak Volume Ratio (Ratio Units)

    Lipid peak volume ratio value with units of ratio

    Scan at the end of Cycle 1 (Each cycle is 21 days)

  • Post Cycle 3: Lipid Peak Volume Ratio (Ratio Units)

    Lipid peak volume ratio value with units of ratio

    Scan at the end of Cycle 3 (Each cycle is 21 days)

  • Post Treatment: Lipid Peak Volume Ratio (Ratio Units)

    Lipid peak volume ratio value with units of ratio

    Scan at the end of Cycle 6 (Each cycle is 21 days)

  • Baseline: Fat Fraction (units of %)

    Fat Fraction with units of %

    Scan at pre-treatment baseline (Prior to start of Cycle 1, each cycle is 21 days)

  • Post Cycle 1: Fat Fraction (units of %)

    Fat Fraction with units of %

    Scan at the end of Cycle 1 (Each cycle is 21 days)

  • Post Cycle 3: Fat Fraction (units of %)

    Fat Fraction with units of %

    Scan at the end of Cycle 3 (Each cycle is 21 days)

  • Post Treatment: Fat Fraction (units of %)

    Fat Fraction with units of %

    Scan at the end of Cycle 6 (Each cycle is 21 days)

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Core Biopsy Tumour Tissue: Ki-67 Staining Percentage (units of %)

    Pre-treatment baseline biopsy (Taken prior to start of Cycle 1, each cycle is 21 days). Assessed following completion of treatment cycles and the routine reporting of core biopsy and excised tissue samples.

  • Excised Tumour Tissue: Ki-67 Staining Percentage (units of %)

    Post-treatment surgery excision (Post Cycle 6, each cycle is 21 days). Assessed following the completion of routine pathological reporting of the excised tissue.

  • Core Biopsy Tumour Tissue: Serotonin Staining Score (arbitrary units)

    Pre-treatment baseline biopsy (Taken prior to start of Cycle 1, each cycle is 21 days). Assessed following completion of treatment cycles and the routine reporting of core biopsy and excised tissue samples.

  • Excised Tumour Tissue: Serotonin Staining Score (arbitrary units)

    Post-treatment surgery excision (Post Cycle 6, each cycle is 21 days). Assessed following the completion of routine pathological reporting of the excised tissue.

  • Core Biopsy Tumour Tissue: Cellularity (units of %)

    Pre-treatment baseline biopsy (Taken prior to start of Cycle 1, each cycle is 21 days). Assessed following completion of treatment cycles and the routine reporting of core biopsy and excised tissue samples.

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Single Arm

EXPERIMENTAL

25 patients with pathologically confirmed invasive breast cancer who will undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment (NACT) and surgery will be recruited. During the study, patients will receive the standard care and the current study will not alter the care plan offered to them. All patients in the single arm will undergo 4 magnetic resonance imaging scan sessions. Histopathological analysis will be performed on the core biopsy and tumour tissue removed in surgery. Health questionnaire will be completed by each patient.

Other: Magnetic Resonance ImagingOther: Histopathological AnalysisOther: Health Questionnaire

Interventions

Patients will undergo 4 MRI sessions during NACT treatment. The first scan will take place at treatment baseline before their first cycle of NACT treatment. The second scan will take place following the first treatment cycle prior to the second treatment cycle. Likewise, the third and last scan will take place after the third treatment cycle and sixth (final) treatment cycle prior to surgery. MRI scan sessions will be composed of research scans including diffusion and lipid profiling MR imaging methods and MR spectroscopy (MRS) methods.

Single Arm

Study specific analysis will be performed on the core biopsy and tissue removed in surgery following the completion of NACT treatment. Standard routine histological analysis will be performed, as well as study specific analysis for immunostaining, grading and slide scan imaging for measurement of cellularity markers.

Single Arm

Health and demographic information will be collected.

Single Arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with pathologically confirmed invasive breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery.

You may not qualify if:

  • Condition to contradictive to MRI investigation with contrast agent (poor renal function, contrast agent allergy, metal implants or pace maker).
  • Started hormone or chemotherapy treatment before recruitment.
  • Undergoing treatment for concurrent cancer diagnosis.
  • Marker coil contradictive to MRI investigation.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

NHS Grampian

Aberdeen, Aberdeenshire, AB25 2ZD, United Kingdom

RECRUITING

Related Publications (13)

  • Lee MC, Newman LA. Management of patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Surg Clin North Am. 2007 Apr;87(2):379-98, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2007.01.012.

    PMID: 17498533BACKGROUND
  • Luangdilok S, Samarnthai N, Korphaisarn K. Association between Pathological Complete Response and Outcome Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Patients. J Breast Cancer. 2014 Dec;17(4):376-85. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2014.17.4.376. Epub 2014 Dec 26.

    PMID: 25548587BACKGROUND
  • Graham LJ, Shupe MP, Schneble EJ, Flynt FL, Clemenshaw MN, Kirkpatrick AD, Gallagher C, Nissan A, Henry L, Stojadinovic A, Peoples GE, Shumway NM. Current approaches and challenges in monitoring treatment responses in breast cancer. J Cancer. 2014 Jan 5;5(1):58-68. doi: 10.7150/jca.7047.

    PMID: 24396498BACKGROUND
  • Danishad KK, Sharma U, Sah RG, Seenu V, Parshad R, Jagannathan NR. Assessment of therapeutic response of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) monitored using sequential magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI). NMR Biomed. 2010 Apr;23(3):233-41. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1436.

    PMID: 20175134BACKGROUND
  • Woodhams R, Kakita S, Hata H, Iwabuchi K, Kuranami M, Gautam S, Hatabu H, Kan S, Mountford C. Identification of residual breast carcinoma following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: diffusion-weighted imaging--comparison with contrast-enhanced MR imaging and pathologic findings. Radiology. 2010 Feb;254(2):357-66. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2542090405.

    PMID: 20093508BACKGROUND
  • Walenta S, Mueller-Klieser WF. Lactate: mirror and motor of tumor malignancy. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2004 Jul;14(3):267-74. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2004.04.004.

    PMID: 15254870BACKGROUND
  • Carmona-Fontaine C, Bucci V, Akkari L, Deforet M, Joyce JA, Xavier JB. Emergence of spatial structure in the tumor microenvironment due to the Warburg effect. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Nov 26;110(48):19402-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1311939110. Epub 2013 Nov 11.

    PMID: 24218566BACKGROUND
  • Bolan PJ, Meisamy S, Baker EH, Lin J, Emory T, Nelson M, Everson LI, Yee D, Garwood M. In vivo quantification of choline compounds in the breast with 1H MR spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med. 2003 Dec;50(6):1134-43. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10654.

    PMID: 14648561BACKGROUND
  • Baik HM, Su MY, Yu H, Mehta R, Nalcioglu O. Quantification of choline-containing compounds in malignant breast tumors by 1H MR spectroscopy using water as an internal reference at 1.5 T. MAGMA. 2006 May;19(2):96-104. doi: 10.1007/s10334-006-0032-4. Epub 2006 May 9.

    PMID: 16779565BACKGROUND
  • He Q, Shkarin P, Hooley RJ, Lannin DR, Weinreb JC, Bossuyt VI. In vivo MR spectroscopic imaging of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) in healthy and cancerous breast tissues by selective multiple-quantum coherence transfer (Sel-MQC): a preliminary study. Magn Reson Med. 2007 Dec;58(6):1079-85. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21335.

    PMID: 17969083BACKGROUND
  • Naressi A, Couturier C, Castang I, de Beer R, Graveron-Demilly D. Java-based graphical user interface for MRUI, a software package for quantitation of in vivo/medical magnetic resonance spectroscopy signals. Comput Biol Med. 2001 Jul;31(4):269-86. doi: 10.1016/s0010-4825(01)00006-3.

    PMID: 11334636BACKGROUND
  • Yamada I, Hikishima K, Miyasaka N, Tokairin Y, Ito E, Kawano T, Kobayashi D, Eishi Y, Okano H. Esophageal carcinoma: Evaluation with q-space diffusion-weighted MR imaging ex vivo. Magn Reson Med. 2015 Jun;73(6):2262-73. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25334. Epub 2014 Jun 19.

    PMID: 24947492BACKGROUND
  • Cheung SM, Wu WS, Senn N, Sharma R, McGoldrick T, Gagliardi T, Husain E, Masannat Y, He J. Towards detection of early response in neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer using Bayesian intravoxel incoherent motion. Front Oncol. 2023 Dec 6;13:1277556. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1277556. eCollection 2023.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyPatient Health Questionnaire

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spectrum AnalysisChemistry Techniques, AnalyticalInvestigative TechniquesSurveys and QuestionnairesData CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsPsychological TestsBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Study Officials

  • Jiabao He, PhD

    University of Aberdeen

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Nicholas Senn, MPhys

    University of Aberdeen

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
Single group with one arm and no masking.
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Single group longitudinal study.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2018

First Posted

April 18, 2018

Study Start

May 2, 2018

Primary Completion

June 1, 2019

Study Completion

June 1, 2019

Last Updated

May 3, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations