NCT01805115

Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of oral, sublingual, vaginal, and no misoprostol prior to operative hysteroscopy in premenopausal women.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2013

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2013

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 4, 2013

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 6, 2013

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2014

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

December 25, 2014

Status Verified

December 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

March 4, 2013

Last Update Submit

December 24, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

hysteroscopymisoprostol

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • the preoperative cervical width

    The primary outcome measure was the preoperative cervical width at the time of operation. The cervical width was assessed by performing cervical dilation, starting with a number 10 Hegar dilator and subsequently inserting smaller Hegar dilators until dilator could pass through the internal os without resistance. The largest one that could be passed was recorded as the initial cervical width.

    just before the operation (From finish of anesthesic induction to introduction of a rigid resectoscope with 10-mm outer sheath diameter in uterine cavity)

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • misoprostol-associated side effects

    before the procedures

Study Arms (4)

Oral misoprostol

EXPERIMENTAL

The oral group (misoprostol 400 ug) self-administered the medications orally 8-10 h before surgery.

Drug: Oral misoprostol

Sublingual misoprostol

EXPERIMENTAL

The sublingual group (misoprostol 400 ug) self-administered the medications sublingually 8-10 h before surgery.

Drug: Sublingual misoprostol

Vaginal misoprostol

EXPERIMENTAL

The vaginal group (misoprostol 400 ug) self-administered the medications vaginally 8-10 h before surgery.

Drug: Vaginal misoprostol

Control

EXPERIMENTAL

The no-misoprostol group did not administer the medication of misoprostol before the procedure

Drug: Control

Interventions

Patients were randomly allocated at the outpatient department into 4 groups with a ratio of 1:1:1:1: the oral, sublingual, vaginal, and no misoprostol group received all 400 μg of misoprostol (two tablets of Cytotec; 200 μg). All misoprostol tablets were identical and patients were blinded to group allocation

Also known as: two tablets of Cytotec (200 μg)
Oral misoprostol

Patients were randomly allocated at the outpatient department into 4 groups with a ratio of 1:1:1:1: the oral, sublingual, vaginal, and no misoprostol group received all 400 μg of misoprostol (two tablets of Cytotec; 200 μg). All misoprostol tablets were identical and patients were blinded to group allocation

Also known as: two tablets of Cytotec (200 μg)
Sublingual misoprostol

Patients were randomly allocated at the outpatient department into 4 groups with a ratio of 1:1:1:1: the oral, sublingual, vaginal, and no misoprostol group received all 400 μg of misoprostol (two tablets of Cytotec; 200 μg). All misoprostol tablets were identical and patients were blinded to group allocation

Also known as: two tablets of Cytotec (200 μg)
Vaginal misoprostol

The control group was not given any cervical priming agents or placebo.

Control

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 55 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Symptomatic patients that were suspected as having intrauterine pathology, such as submucosal myoma, endometrial polyp or other endometrial pathological findings based on the transvaginal ultrasound, were enrolled.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

CHA Gangnam Medical Center

Seoul, 135-081, South Korea

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Song T, Kim MK, Kim ML, Jung YW, Yoon BS, Seong SJ. Effectiveness of different routes of misoprostol administration before operative hysteroscopy: a randomized, controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2014 Aug;102(2):519-24. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.04.040. Epub 2014 May 23.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Misoprostol

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Prostaglandins E, SyntheticProstaglandins, SyntheticProstaglandinsEicosanoidsFatty Acids, UnsaturatedFatty AcidsLipidsAutacoidsInflammation MediatorsBiological Factors

Study Officials

  • Taejong Song, MD

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University, Seoul, Korea

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 4, 2013

First Posted

March 6, 2013

Study Start

March 1, 2013

Primary Completion

January 1, 2014

Study Completion

February 1, 2014

Last Updated

December 25, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-12

Locations