NCT03484793

Brief Summary

Medication errors are common, life-threatening, costly but preventable. Information technology and automated systems are highly efficient for preventing medication errors and therefore widely employed in hospital settings. In this study, investigators would perform a cluster randomized controlled trial of a clinical reminding system that uses DNN and Probabilistic models to detect and notify physicians of inappropriate prescriptions, giving them the opportunity to correct these gaps and increase prescriptions completeness. This study aim is to assess whether or not this system would improve prescription notation for a broad array of patient conditions.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
37

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable hypertension

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2017

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable hypertension

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2017

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 28, 2018

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 26, 2018

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 2, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

April 3, 2018

Status Verified

January 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

March 26, 2018

Last Update Submit

March 31, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

AESOP ModelBig datamedication errordata miningpatient safetyCPOECDSSalarm fatigueassociation rule mining.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The acceptance rate of reminder between two groups intervention and control

    The primary outcome of this study is the acceptance rate of the reminder, defined as the number of reminders accepted divided by number of unique reminders presented. In certain instances, physicians might see the same reminder serially, so we aggregate presentations and acceptance of the same reminder for the same patients' prescriptions in our calculation of the acceptance rate.

    3 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • The changes in the number of reminder for each group

    3 months

Study Arms (2)

AESOP integrated to CPOE for reducing medication errors

EXPERIMENTAL

18 were assigned to the experimental group

Other: AESOP service system

Non AESOP

NO INTERVENTION

19 were assigned to the traditional CPOE system

Interventions

Investigators develop an electronic reminder in CPOE system which notifies physicians when there appears to be an inappropriate prescription. At the time, a physician saves a typed prescription, our system analyzes the patient's medications, diseases and uses the knowledge base to determine whether a medication is uncommonly prescribed to all diseases in a given prescription. If the system detects the common associations of medications and diseases in a given prescription, it considers an appropriate prescription, and, if not, an actionable reminder is shown onscreen. To the right of each suggested uncommon medication is a reason why the reminder is appearing. Physicians can accept the reminder or ignore the reminder.

AESOP integrated to CPOE for reducing medication errors

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Physicians who are working at the outpatient clinics in hospitals.
  • Physicians who sign the consent form

You may not qualify if:

  • Physicians who are unable to participate in this trial for the whole process
  • Physicians who do not sign the consent form

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

TMU-Shuang-Ho Hospital

Taipei, Taiwan

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

HypertensionAlert Fatigue, Health Personnel

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Vascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesMental FatigueFatigueSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBehavioral SymptomsBehavior

Study Officials

  • Yu-Chuan MD Li, PhD

    Taipei Medical University

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Chuya Huang, MA

    Taipei Medical University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 26, 2018

First Posted

April 2, 2018

Study Start

May 1, 2017

Primary Completion

December 31, 2017

Study Completion

February 28, 2018

Last Updated

April 3, 2018

Record last verified: 2017-01

Locations