Goserelin for Ovarian Protection in Premenopausal Patients Receiving Cyclophosphamide
Phase II Study of Goserelin for Ovarian Protection in Premenopausal Patients Receiving Cyclophosphamide Containing Chemotherapy: Menstruation Outcome
1 other identifier
interventional
100
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The use of adjuvant chemotherapy in younger women with early breast cancer (EBC) has substantially improved the long-term outcome. However, this benefit is associated with long-term toxic effects which are becoming more important as prognosis improves. These include premature menopause and infertility in young pre-menopausal women. The incidence of premature menopause depends on the type and intensity of chemotherapy and the patient's age. In women \<35 years old, the long-term (3 years after diagnosis) incidence of amenorrhea is similar to women who have not received chemotherapy, at ∼ 10%, but this increases to 50% in women between 35 and 40 years old, and can be up to 85% in women \>40 years. Premature ovarian failure has major consequences including sexual dysfunction and infertility, and the latter may be of great concern to younger patients with breast cancer and has a bearing in influencing treatment decisions in almost 30% of cases. Currently, there is no standard treatment for preventing chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure. Previous studies have suggested that temporary ovarian suppression with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue may preserve ovarian function both in humans and animal models. Clinical data are conflicting. For example, a recent Italian multi-center phase III study Prevention of Menopause-Induced by Chemotherapy: A Study in Early Breast Cancer Patients-Gruppo Italiano Mamella 6 (PROMISE-GIM6) reported that the use of GnRH analogue, triptorelin during chemotherapy in pre-menopausal patients with EBC, reduced the occurrence of chemotherapy-induced early menopause with four pregnancies after a 26-month follow-up \[one in the chemotherapy alone arm and three in the triptorelin with chemotherapy arm\]. In contrast, another trial suggested that the use of goserelin concurrently with neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not significantly reduce incidence of amenorrhea 6 months after the end of chemotherapy compared with those receiving chemotherapy alone and only two pregnancies were recorded \[one in each arm\] with a follow-up of 2 years.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Mar 2018
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 11, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 23, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2020
CompletedMarch 23, 2018
March 1, 2018
2 years
March 11, 2018
March 17, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
compare rate of ovarian failure at 1 year between the two treatment groups
rate of ovarian failure
1 year
Study Arms (2)
chemotherapy without goserelin
NO INTERVENTIONthese patients will receive their chemotherapy without addition of Goserelin
chemotherapy with goserelin
EXPERIMENTALthese patients will receive their chemotherapy with addition of Goserelin
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Premenopausal cancer patients who will receive Cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy.
You may not qualify if:
- postmenopausal cancer patients. cancer patients who will receive non Cyclophosphamide containing chemotherapy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG); Peto R, Davies C, Godwin J, Gray R, Pan HC, Clarke M, Cutter D, Darby S, McGale P, Taylor C, Wang YC, Bergh J, Di Leo A, Albain K, Swain S, Piccart M, Pritchard K. Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials. Lancet. 2012 Feb 4;379(9814):432-44. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61625-5. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
PMID: 22152853BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
samir Eid, phd
Assiut University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- assisstant lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 11, 2018
First Posted
March 23, 2018
Study Start
March 1, 2018
Primary Completion
March 1, 2020
Study Completion
March 1, 2020
Last Updated
March 23, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share