NCT02280681

Brief Summary

To gain insight by means of a discrete choice experiment questionnaire into characteristics of medically assisted reproduction (MAR) with artificial gametes (AGs) valued by couples confronted with ovarian failure and their physicians and the trade-offs they make between these treatment characteristics.

Trial Health

53
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
400

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2014

Longer than P75 for all trials

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2014

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 29, 2014

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 31, 2014

Completed
10.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

July 15, 2024

Status Verified

July 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

11 years

First QC Date

October 29, 2014

Last Update Submit

July 12, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

reproductive medicineartificial gametespatient preferencedecision making

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Relative importance of predefined treatment characteristics

    single time point

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Demographic and self-reported medical data that define the importance of the treatment characteristics

    single time poin

Study Arms (2)

Couples with ovarian failure

Heterosexual couples confronted with infertility due to ovarian failure between the age of 18 and 44 years old treated in the K.U.Leuven and

Other: No intervention, only questionnaire

Clinicians

Clinicians who indicated an interest in reproductive medicine in their membership of the Belgian Society for Reproductive Medicine (BSRM).

Other: No intervention, only questionnaire

Interventions

No intervention, only questionnaire containing a discrete choice experiment identifying the importance of treatment aspects for deciding between current treatments and possible future treatments with artificial gametes

CliniciansCouples with ovarian failure

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 44 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

1. Heterosexual couples confronted with infertility due to ovarian failure between the age of 18 and 44 years old treated in the K.U.Leuven and 2. clinicians who indicated an interest in reproductive medicine in their membership of the Belgian Society for Reproductive Medicine (BSRM).

You may qualify if:

  • Heterosexual couples confronted with infertility due to ovarian failure between the age of 18 and 44 years old treated in the K.U.Leuven

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (4)

  • Hendriks S, Dancet EA, Meissner A, van der Veen F, Mochtar MH, Repping S. Perspectives of infertile men on future stem cell treatments for nonobstructive azoospermia. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 May;28(5):650-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.01.011. Epub 2014 Jan 31.

    PMID: 24656558BACKGROUND
  • Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, Nygren KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod. 2007 Jun;22(6):1506-12. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem046. Epub 2007 Mar 21.

    PMID: 17376819BACKGROUND
  • Harper J, Magli MC, Lundin K, Barratt CL, Brison D. When and how should new technology be introduced into the IVF laboratory? Hum Reprod. 2012 Feb;27(2):303-13. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der414. Epub 2011 Dec 12.

    PMID: 22166806BACKGROUND
  • Ryan M, Farrar S. Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. BMJ. 2000 Jun 3;320(7248):1530-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1530. No abstract available.

    PMID: 10834905BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Patient Preference

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Patient SatisfactionTreatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorBehavior

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Target Duration
1 Day
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 29, 2014

First Posted

October 31, 2014

Study Start

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion

October 1, 2025

Study Completion

October 1, 2025

Last Updated

July 15, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-07