NCT03470532

Brief Summary

This study compares the the efficacy of buccal infiltration of 4% Articaine and 2% Mepivacaine without any palatal injection during extraction of maxillary teeth. One group of patient receives buccal infiltration of Articaine and another group receives buccal infiltration of Mepivacaine.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4 pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 25, 2017

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2018

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 9, 2018

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 20, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

March 21, 2018

Status Verified

March 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

March 9, 2018

Last Update Submit

March 19, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Measurement of pain intensity

    pain intensity in the palatal mucosa is measured using Visual Analogue Scale during instrumentation to check objective symptoms of numbness. The pain is marked from 0-100 mm in a 100 mm visual analogue scale ( 0= no pain, 100= extremely severe pain).

    10 minutes after the administration of the drug

  • Measurement of pain intensity

    pain intensity in the palatal mucosa is measured using Visual Analogue Scale during flap elevation procedure . The pain is marked from 0-100 mm in a 100 mm visual analogue scale ( 0= no pain, 100= extremely severe pain).

    through the extraction procedure

  • Measurement of pain intensity

    pain intensity is measured using Visual Analogue Scale during extraction of tooth. The pain is marked from 0-100 mm in a 100 mm visul analogue scale ( 0= no pain, 100= extremely severe pain).

    Through the extraction procedure

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Response rate

    Through the extraction procedure

Study Arms (2)

Group A

EXPERIMENTAL

buccal infiltration of 4% Articaine with epinephrine

Drug: buccal infiltration of 4% Articaine with Epinephrine

Group B

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

buccal infiltration of 2% Mepivacaine with epinephrine

Drug: buccal infiltration of 2% Mepivacaine with Epinephrine

Interventions

Articaine Hydrochloride 4 % / Epinephrine 1:200,000 1.8 ML Cartridge

Also known as: Septocaine 4%
Group A

Mepivacaine Hydrochloride 2% Epinephrine 1:200,000 2.2 Ml Cartridge

Also known as: Scandonest 2%
Group B

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aged 18 years and above
  • Patients requiring extraction of maxillary teeth which are grossly decayed, grade I mobile, root stumps or indicated for therapeutic extractions.
  • Healthy patients ( ASA I ) or patients with mild systemic disease with no functional limitations (ASA II).
  • Patients who are not allergic to the drugs used in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with periapical infections.
  • Patients who are on concurrent treatment with NSAIDs and corticosteroids

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Melaka Manipal Medical College

Malacca, 75150, Malaysia

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain

Interventions

CarticaineEpinephrineMepivacaine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ThiophenesSulfur CompoundsOrganic ChemicalsHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsEthanolaminesAmino AlcoholsAlcoholsAminesBiogenic MonoaminesBiogenic AminesCatecholaminesCatecholsPhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsPiperidines

Study Officials

  • Abdul k Azad, MDS

    Melaka Manipal Medical College,Faculty of Dentistry, Manipal Academy of Higher Education

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor, Dept Of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 9, 2018

First Posted

March 20, 2018

Study Start

February 25, 2017

Primary Completion

March 1, 2018

Study Completion

March 1, 2018

Last Updated

March 21, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-03

Locations