Functional Movement Analysis of Handball Players
Relationship of Functional Movement Analysis With Injury History and Athletic Parameters In Handball Athletes
1 other identifier
interventional
51
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
RELATIONSHIP OF FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS WITH INJURY HISTORY AND ATHLETIC PARAMETERS IN HANDBALL ATHLETES Abstract Objectives: Handball is a popular sport in many countries. There is lack of knowledge about handball athlete's functional movement capacity. The aim of this study is to investigate the Functional Movement Screen (FMS™) scores, to evaluate the injury risks of handball athletes and to determine its relationship with athletic performance. Design: Observational study. Methods: A total of 51 professional handball players in Turkey were included in this study. The sport-specific features and demographic data were recorded. The functional movement analysis was performed and agility and balance and force were evaluated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 18, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 18, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 16, 2018
CompletedMarch 16, 2018
March 1, 2018
10 months
November 1, 2017
March 15, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Functional Movement Screen Assessment (FMS)
0-21 (It has 7 subtests, and minimum 0 and maximum 3 is given for scoring.) Higher scores are better. For bilateral subtests, scoring is performed for both sides, and scoring is given according to lower side. ( Example; Right 2, Left 1 so 1 point score is given for that parameter. At last, all 7 scores summed for total score(0/21).
20 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Vertical Jump Test
5 minutes
Y Balance Test
10 minutes
Illinois Agility Test
2 minutes
Study Arms (5)
Functional Movement Screen
EXPERIMENTALMovement Analysis for injury risk
Vertical Jump Test
EXPERIMENTALJump test Height Measurement, Functional Movement Screen
Y Balance Test
EXPERIMENTALFunctional lower extremity reach with balance, Functional Movement Screen
Illinois Agility Test
EXPERIMENTALAgility measurement, Functional Movement Screen
Injury History
NO INTERVENTIONAthletes injury history for last year was recorded as injury count.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Become a team licensed handball athlete between ages 16-35
- Have not had a surgical operation involving the musculoskeletal system in the last six months
- Not having an obstacle to the realization of the tests to be carried out in the study
- Volunteering to participate in the work
You may not qualify if:
- If feeling any discomfort during the tests
- Do not want to go on study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (7)
Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 1. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2006 May;1(2):62-72.
PMID: 21522216BACKGROUNDCook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 2. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Aug;1(3):132-9.
PMID: 21522225BACKGROUNDPlisky PJ, Gorman PP, Butler RJ, Kiesel KB, Underwood FB, Elkins B. The reliability of an instrumented device for measuring components of the star excursion balance test. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2009 May;4(2):92-9.
PMID: 21509114BACKGROUNDHachana Y, Chaabene H, Nabli MA, Attia A, Moualhi J, Farhat N, Elloumi M. Test-retest reliability, criterion-related validity, and minimal detectable change of the Illinois agility test in male team sport athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Oct;27(10):2752-9. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182890ac3.
PMID: 23439329BACKGROUNDRaya MA, Gailey RS, Gaunaurd IA, Jayne DM, Campbell SM, Gagne E, Manrique PG, Muller DG, Tucker C. Comparison of three agility tests with male servicemembers: Edgren Side Step Test, T-Test, and Illinois Agility Test. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(7):951-60. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2012.05.0096.
PMID: 24301432BACKGROUNDCarlock JM, Smith SL, Hartman MJ, Morris RT, Ciroslan DA, Pierce KC, Newton RU, Harman EA, Sands WA, Stone MH. The relationship between vertical jump power estimates and weightlifting ability: a field-test approach. J Strength Cond Res. 2004 Aug;18(3):534-9. doi: 10.1519/R-13213.1.
PMID: 15320676BACKGROUNDAtalay ES, Tarakci D, Algun C. Are the functional movement analysis scores of handball players related to athletic parameters? J Exerc Rehabil. 2018 Dec 27;14(6):954-959. doi: 10.12965/jer.1836372.186. eCollection 2018 Dec.
PMID: 30656154DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Devrim Tarakcı, PhD
Medipol University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Emre Serdar Vayvay, PhD
Medipol University
- STUDY CHAIR
Candan Algun, PhD,Prof
Medipol University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 1, 2017
First Posted
March 16, 2018
Study Start
August 1, 2016
Primary Completion
May 18, 2017
Study Completion
May 18, 2017
Last Updated
March 16, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share