NCT03468569

Brief Summary

RELATIONSHIP OF FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS WITH INJURY HISTORY AND ATHLETIC PARAMETERS IN HANDBALL ATHLETES Abstract Objectives: Handball is a popular sport in many countries. There is lack of knowledge about handball athlete's functional movement capacity. The aim of this study is to investigate the Functional Movement Screen (FMS™) scores, to evaluate the injury risks of handball athletes and to determine its relationship with athletic performance. Design: Observational study. Methods: A total of 51 professional handball players in Turkey were included in this study. The sport-specific features and demographic data were recorded. The functional movement analysis was performed and agility and balance and force were evaluated.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
51

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2016

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2016

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 18, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 18, 2017

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 1, 2017

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 16, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

March 16, 2018

Status Verified

March 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

November 1, 2017

Last Update Submit

March 15, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Athletic PerformanceFunctional Movement ScreenHandball AthletesInjury PreventionInjury History

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Functional Movement Screen Assessment (FMS)

    0-21 (It has 7 subtests, and minimum 0 and maximum 3 is given for scoring.) Higher scores are better. For bilateral subtests, scoring is performed for both sides, and scoring is given according to lower side. ( Example; Right 2, Left 1 so 1 point score is given for that parameter. At last, all 7 scores summed for total score(0/21).

    20 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Vertical Jump Test

    5 minutes

  • Y Balance Test

    10 minutes

  • Illinois Agility Test

    2 minutes

Study Arms (5)

Functional Movement Screen

EXPERIMENTAL

Movement Analysis for injury risk

Other: Functional Movement Screen

Vertical Jump Test

EXPERIMENTAL

Jump test Height Measurement, Functional Movement Screen

Other: Functional Movement Screen

Y Balance Test

EXPERIMENTAL

Functional lower extremity reach with balance, Functional Movement Screen

Other: Functional Movement Screen

Illinois Agility Test

EXPERIMENTAL

Agility measurement, Functional Movement Screen

Other: Functional Movement Screen

Injury History

NO INTERVENTION

Athletes injury history for last year was recorded as injury count.

Interventions

Functional Movement ScreenIllinois Agility TestVertical Jump TestY Balance Test

Eligibility Criteria

Age16 Years - 35 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Become a team licensed handball athlete between ages 16-35
  • Have not had a surgical operation involving the musculoskeletal system in the last six months
  • Not having an obstacle to the realization of the tests to be carried out in the study
  • Volunteering to participate in the work

You may not qualify if:

  • If feeling any discomfort during the tests
  • Do not want to go on study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (7)

  • Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 1. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2006 May;1(2):62-72.

    PMID: 21522216BACKGROUND
  • Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 2. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Aug;1(3):132-9.

    PMID: 21522225BACKGROUND
  • Plisky PJ, Gorman PP, Butler RJ, Kiesel KB, Underwood FB, Elkins B. The reliability of an instrumented device for measuring components of the star excursion balance test. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2009 May;4(2):92-9.

    PMID: 21509114BACKGROUND
  • Hachana Y, Chaabene H, Nabli MA, Attia A, Moualhi J, Farhat N, Elloumi M. Test-retest reliability, criterion-related validity, and minimal detectable change of the Illinois agility test in male team sport athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Oct;27(10):2752-9. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182890ac3.

    PMID: 23439329BACKGROUND
  • Raya MA, Gailey RS, Gaunaurd IA, Jayne DM, Campbell SM, Gagne E, Manrique PG, Muller DG, Tucker C. Comparison of three agility tests with male servicemembers: Edgren Side Step Test, T-Test, and Illinois Agility Test. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(7):951-60. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2012.05.0096.

    PMID: 24301432BACKGROUND
  • Carlock JM, Smith SL, Hartman MJ, Morris RT, Ciroslan DA, Pierce KC, Newton RU, Harman EA, Sands WA, Stone MH. The relationship between vertical jump power estimates and weightlifting ability: a field-test approach. J Strength Cond Res. 2004 Aug;18(3):534-9. doi: 10.1519/R-13213.1.

    PMID: 15320676BACKGROUND
  • Atalay ES, Tarakci D, Algun C. Are the functional movement analysis scores of handball players related to athletic parameters? J Exerc Rehabil. 2018 Dec 27;14(6):954-959. doi: 10.12965/jer.1836372.186. eCollection 2018 Dec.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Wounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Devrim Tarakcı, PhD

    Medipol University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Emre Serdar Vayvay, PhD

    Medipol University

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Candan Algun, PhD,Prof

    Medipol University

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Lecturer

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 1, 2017

First Posted

March 16, 2018

Study Start

August 1, 2016

Primary Completion

May 18, 2017

Study Completion

May 18, 2017

Last Updated

March 16, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share