NCT03465384

Brief Summary

The Comet-program is a Swedish parent training program developed to target externalizing behaviors in children between 3-11 years. The program is normally delivered in group format in primary and specialized care and has already been evaluated in several studies. The internet-based version of the program has also been evaluated separately, but in this study the two formats will be directly compared in a randomized non-inferiority study. Parent ratings, child ratings as well as blinded clinical assessments will be conducted before the interventions, after the interventions (2-3 month after start of intervention), and at follow-up (12 mont after first assessment). The primary research question is: Will the internet-based format of Comet be at least as effective as the group format in reducing externalizing behaviors? Secondary research questions concern possible differential effects of the two formats on cost-effectiveness, parenting behaviors, parent mental health, applicability and consumer satisfaction, and the children's quality of life.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
161

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

7 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 1, 2018

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 14, 2018

Completed
5 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 19, 2018

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 20, 2020

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 20, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

March 10, 2022

Status Verified

March 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2.7 years

First QC Date

March 1, 2018

Last Update Submit

March 9, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Parent-Child relationsParentingNon-inferiority trialExternalizing behaviorsRandomized controlled trialCost-effectiveness

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (change in externalizing behaviors)

    A rating scale completed by parents measuring externalizing behaviors in children. The scale contains two subscales which both will be reported independently as outcomes in this study: The intensity scale (range 36-252) and the problem scale (range 0-36). In both cases higher values indicate more externalizing behaviors.

    Pre (0 month), Post (4 month) and Follow-up (12 month)

  • Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire - subscale hyperactivity/inattention (change)

    A rating scale completed by parents measuring both externalizing and internalizing behaviors in children, as well as the impact of such behaviors. The subscale of hyperactivity/attention problems will be used as a primary outcome in this study (range 0-10, where higher values represent more hyperactivity/inattention).

    Pre (0 month), Post (4 month) and Follow-up (12 month)

  • Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (change in diagnostic status)

    A structured diagnostic interview conducted by clinicians with parents and (if possible) the child. Only the sections for ADHD and ODD will be used in the present study. Outcomes that will be reported are diagnostic status of both ADHD and ODD (yes/no), the number of symptoms (range 0-20 for ADHD and 0-9 for ODD), and the clinician rated severity (range 0-8 for each diagnosis, where higher value represents more severe problems).

    Pre (0 month) and Post (4 month)

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Parenting Young Children (change in parenting strategies)

    Pre (0 month), Post (4 month) and Follow-up (12 month)

  • Adult-Child Relationship Scale (change in quality of relationship)

    Pre (0 month), Post (4 month) and Follow-up (12 month)

  • Perceived Stress Scale (change in stress)

    Pre (0 month), Post (4 month) and Follow-up (12 month)

  • Patient Health Questionnaire (change in depressive symptoms)

    Pre (0 month), Post (4 month) and Follow-up (12 month)

  • Kiddy-KINDL Interview (change in quality of life)

    Pre (0 month) and Post (4 month)

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire - impact (change across intervention)

    Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11.

Study Arms (2)

Comet in group format

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The standard format of the intervention that is well established in primary and specialized care in Sweden. Parents receive the education/training in small groups led by two group leaders.

Behavioral: Comet

Internet-based Comet

EXPERIMENTAL

The same content as the group format of Comet, but delivered mainly as online self-help.

Behavioral: Comet

Interventions

CometBEHAVIORAL

The intervention is a behaviorally based and manualized parent training program.

Comet in group formatInternet-based Comet

Eligibility Criteria

Age3 Years - 11 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Primary reason for contact with health care is child externalizing behaviors.

You may not qualify if:

  • Not sufficiently fluent in written Swedish to be able to take part in an internet-based (text-based) intervention.
  • No access to computer/ipad/phone
  • Social problems that makes investigation or intervention from the social services necessary.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (7)

Gustavsbergs VC

Gustavsberg, 13440, Sweden

Location

Rudans VC

Handen, 13646, Sweden

Location

Boo VC

Nacka, 13230, Sweden

Location

Inside Team

Stockholm, 11359, Sweden

Location

Moment Psykologi

Stockholm, 11360, Sweden

Location

Liljeholmens BUMM

Stockholm, 11763, Sweden

Location

Alva Barnklinik

Stockholm, 118 72, Sweden

Location

Related Publications (23)

  • Attkisson CC, Zwick R. The client satisfaction questionnaire. Psychometric properties and correlations with service utilization and psychotherapy outcome. Eval Program Plann. 1982;5(3):233-7. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(82)90074-x.

    PMID: 10259963BACKGROUND
  • Bullinger M, Brutt AL, Erhart M, Ravens-Sieberer U; BELLA Study Group. Psychometric properties of the KINDL-R questionnaire: results of the BELLA study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;17 Suppl 1:125-32. doi: 10.1007/s00787-008-1014-z.

    PMID: 19132312BACKGROUND
  • Enebrink P, Hogstrom J, Forster M, Ghaderi A. Internet-based parent management training: a randomized controlled study. Behav Res Ther. 2012 Apr;50(4):240-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2012.01.006. Epub 2012 Jan 30.

    PMID: 22398153BACKGROUND
  • Essau, C. A., Sasagawa, S., & Frick, P. J. (2006). Psychometric Properties of the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 15(5), 595-614.

    BACKGROUND
  • Eyberg, S. M., & Pincus, D. (1999). Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI) and Sutter-Eyberg Student Behavior Inventory-Revised (SESBI-R). Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    BACKGROUND
  • Flight L, Julious SA. Practical guide to sample size calculations: non-inferiority and equivalence trials. Pharm Stat. 2016 Jan-Feb;15(1):80-9. doi: 10.1002/pst.1716. Epub 2015 Nov 25.

    PMID: 26604186BACKGROUND
  • Folkhälsomyndigheten. (2013). Så arbetar kommuner, landsting, kommun- och regionförbund och ideella organisationer med föräldrastöd. Östersund & Stockholm.

    BACKGROUND
  • Ghaderi A, Kadesjo C, Bjornsdotter A, Enebrink P. Randomized effectiveness Trial of the Family Check-Up versus Internet-delivered Parent Training (iComet) for Families of Children with Conduct Problems. Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 31;8(1):11486. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29550-z.

    PMID: 30065246BACKGROUND
  • Goodman R. Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001 Nov;40(11):1337-45. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200111000-00015.

    PMID: 11699809BACKGROUND
  • Hogstrom J, Olofsson V, Ozdemir M, Enebrink P, Stattin H. Two-Year Findings from a National Effectiveness Trial: Effectiveness of Behavioral and Non-Behavioral Parenting Programs. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2017 Apr;45(3):527-542. doi: 10.1007/s10802-016-0178-0.

    PMID: 27334706BACKGROUND
  • Julious SA. Sample sizes for clinical trials with normal data. Stat Med. 2004 Jun 30;23(12):1921-86. doi: 10.1002/sim.1783.

    PMID: 15195324BACKGROUND
  • Kling A, Forster M, Sundell K, Melin L. A randomized controlled effectiveness trial of parent management training with varying degrees of therapist support. Behav Ther. 2010 Dec;41(4):530-42. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2010.02.004. Epub 2010 Oct 1.

    PMID: 21035616BACKGROUND
  • McEachern AD, Dishion TJ, Weaver CM, Shaw DS, Wilson MN, Gardner F. Parenting Young Children (PARYC): Validation of a Self-Report Parenting Measure. J Child Fam Stud. 2012 Jun;21(3):498-511. doi: 10.1007/s10826-011-9503-y.

    PMID: 22876108BACKGROUND
  • Nordin M, Nordin S. Psychometric evaluation and normative data of the Swedish version of the 10-item perceived stress scale. Scand J Psychol. 2013 Dec;54(6):502-7. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12071. Epub 2013 Oct 5.

    PMID: 24118069BACKGROUND
  • Sampaio F, Enebrink P, Mihalopoulos C, Feldman I. Cost-Effectiveness of Four Parenting Programs and Bibliotherapy for Parents of Children with Conduct Problems. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2016 Dec 1;19(4):201-212.

    PMID: 27991419BACKGROUND
  • Schumi J, Wittes JT. Through the looking glass: understanding non-inferiority. Trials. 2011 May 3;12:106. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-106.

    PMID: 21539749BACKGROUND
  • Sheehan DV, Sheehan KH, Shytle RD, Janavs J, Bannon Y, Rogers JE, Milo KM, Stock SL, Wilkinson B. Reliability and validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (MINI-KID). J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Mar;71(3):313-26. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05305whi.

    PMID: 20331933BACKGROUND
  • Socialstyrelsen. (2009). Socialtjänstens öppna verksamheter för barn och unga - en nationell inventering av metoder. Stockholm.

    BACKGROUND
  • Stattin H, Enebrink P, Ozdemir M, Giannotta F. A national evaluation of parenting programs in Sweden: The short-term effects using an RCT effectiveness design. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Dec;83(6):1069-1084. doi: 10.1037/a0039328. Epub 2015 May 25.

    PMID: 26009784BACKGROUND
  • Titov N, Dear BF, McMillan D, Anderson T, Zou J, Sunderland M. Psychometric comparison of the PHQ-9 and BDI-II for measuring response during treatment of depression. Cogn Behav Ther. 2011;40(2):126-36. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2010.550059.

    PMID: 25155813BACKGROUND
  • Trentacosta CJ, Criss MM, Shaw DS, Lacourse E, Hyde LW, Dishion TJ. Antecedents and outcomes of joint trajectories of mother-son conflict and warmth during middle childhood and adolescence. Child Dev. 2011 Sep-Oct;82(5):1676-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01626.x. Epub 2011 Aug 29.

    PMID: 21883153BACKGROUND
  • Vårdgivarguiden. (2017). Vägledningsdokument: Utagerande beteende hos barn och unga med psykisk ohälsa.

    BACKGROUND
  • Engelbrektsson J, Salomonsson S, Hogstrom J, Sorjonen K, Sundell K, Forster M. Parent Training via Internet or in Group for Disruptive Behaviors: A Randomized Clinical Noninferiority Trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 Sep;62(9):987-997. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2023.01.019. Epub 2023 Feb 28.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Oppositional Defiant DisorderAttention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity

Interventions

Comet Assay

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior DisordersNeurodevelopmental DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Electrophoresis, Agar GelElectrophoresisChemistry Techniques, AnalyticalInvestigative TechniquesElectrochemical TechniquesMutagenicity TestsGenetic TechniquesToxicity Tests

Study Officials

  • Martin Forster, PhD

    Karolinska Institutet

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Independent clinicians will perform diagnostic assessments at pre and post measurements. The clinicians will be blind to the experimental condition the participants they assess.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants are randomized to the standard intervention (Parent training in group format) or the experimental condition (Internet-based parent training).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2018

First Posted

March 14, 2018

Study Start

March 19, 2018

Primary Completion

November 20, 2020

Study Completion

December 20, 2021

Last Updated

March 10, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-03

Locations