Randomized Controlled Trial of Comet Via the Internet or in Group Format.
Parent Training Targeting Externalizing Behaviors in Children in Primary Care: A Randomized Non-inferiority Study of the Comet-program Delivered Via the Internet or in Group Format.
1 other identifier
interventional
161
1 country
7
Brief Summary
The Comet-program is a Swedish parent training program developed to target externalizing behaviors in children between 3-11 years. The program is normally delivered in group format in primary and specialized care and has already been evaluated in several studies. The internet-based version of the program has also been evaluated separately, but in this study the two formats will be directly compared in a randomized non-inferiority study. Parent ratings, child ratings as well as blinded clinical assessments will be conducted before the interventions, after the interventions (2-3 month after start of intervention), and at follow-up (12 mont after first assessment). The primary research question is: Will the internet-based format of Comet be at least as effective as the group format in reducing externalizing behaviors? Secondary research questions concern possible differential effects of the two formats on cost-effectiveness, parenting behaviors, parent mental health, applicability and consumer satisfaction, and the children's quality of life.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 14, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 19, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 20, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 20, 2021
CompletedMarch 10, 2022
March 1, 2022
2.7 years
March 1, 2018
March 9, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (change in externalizing behaviors)
A rating scale completed by parents measuring externalizing behaviors in children. The scale contains two subscales which both will be reported independently as outcomes in this study: The intensity scale (range 36-252) and the problem scale (range 0-36). In both cases higher values indicate more externalizing behaviors.
Pre (0 month), Post (4 month) and Follow-up (12 month)
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire - subscale hyperactivity/inattention (change)
A rating scale completed by parents measuring both externalizing and internalizing behaviors in children, as well as the impact of such behaviors. The subscale of hyperactivity/attention problems will be used as a primary outcome in this study (range 0-10, where higher values represent more hyperactivity/inattention).
Pre (0 month), Post (4 month) and Follow-up (12 month)
Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (change in diagnostic status)
A structured diagnostic interview conducted by clinicians with parents and (if possible) the child. Only the sections for ADHD and ODD will be used in the present study. Outcomes that will be reported are diagnostic status of both ADHD and ODD (yes/no), the number of symptoms (range 0-20 for ADHD and 0-9 for ODD), and the clinician rated severity (range 0-8 for each diagnosis, where higher value represents more severe problems).
Pre (0 month) and Post (4 month)
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Parenting Young Children (change in parenting strategies)
Pre (0 month), Post (4 month) and Follow-up (12 month)
Adult-Child Relationship Scale (change in quality of relationship)
Pre (0 month), Post (4 month) and Follow-up (12 month)
Perceived Stress Scale (change in stress)
Pre (0 month), Post (4 month) and Follow-up (12 month)
Patient Health Questionnaire (change in depressive symptoms)
Pre (0 month), Post (4 month) and Follow-up (12 month)
Kiddy-KINDL Interview (change in quality of life)
Pre (0 month) and Post (4 month)
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire - impact (change across intervention)
Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11.
Study Arms (2)
Comet in group format
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe standard format of the intervention that is well established in primary and specialized care in Sweden. Parents receive the education/training in small groups led by two group leaders.
Internet-based Comet
EXPERIMENTALThe same content as the group format of Comet, but delivered mainly as online self-help.
Interventions
The intervention is a behaviorally based and manualized parent training program.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Primary reason for contact with health care is child externalizing behaviors.
You may not qualify if:
- Not sufficiently fluent in written Swedish to be able to take part in an internet-based (text-based) intervention.
- No access to computer/ipad/phone
- Social problems that makes investigation or intervention from the social services necessary.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Karolinska Institutetlead
- Region Stockholmcollaborator
Study Sites (7)
Gustavsbergs VC
Gustavsberg, 13440, Sweden
Rudans VC
Handen, 13646, Sweden
Boo VC
Nacka, 13230, Sweden
Inside Team
Stockholm, 11359, Sweden
Moment Psykologi
Stockholm, 11360, Sweden
Liljeholmens BUMM
Stockholm, 11763, Sweden
Alva Barnklinik
Stockholm, 118 72, Sweden
Related Publications (23)
Attkisson CC, Zwick R. The client satisfaction questionnaire. Psychometric properties and correlations with service utilization and psychotherapy outcome. Eval Program Plann. 1982;5(3):233-7. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(82)90074-x.
PMID: 10259963BACKGROUNDBullinger M, Brutt AL, Erhart M, Ravens-Sieberer U; BELLA Study Group. Psychometric properties of the KINDL-R questionnaire: results of the BELLA study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;17 Suppl 1:125-32. doi: 10.1007/s00787-008-1014-z.
PMID: 19132312BACKGROUNDEnebrink P, Hogstrom J, Forster M, Ghaderi A. Internet-based parent management training: a randomized controlled study. Behav Res Ther. 2012 Apr;50(4):240-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2012.01.006. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
PMID: 22398153BACKGROUNDEssau, C. A., Sasagawa, S., & Frick, P. J. (2006). Psychometric Properties of the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 15(5), 595-614.
BACKGROUNDEyberg, S. M., & Pincus, D. (1999). Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI) and Sutter-Eyberg Student Behavior Inventory-Revised (SESBI-R). Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
BACKGROUNDFlight L, Julious SA. Practical guide to sample size calculations: non-inferiority and equivalence trials. Pharm Stat. 2016 Jan-Feb;15(1):80-9. doi: 10.1002/pst.1716. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
PMID: 26604186BACKGROUNDFolkhälsomyndigheten. (2013). Så arbetar kommuner, landsting, kommun- och regionförbund och ideella organisationer med föräldrastöd. Östersund & Stockholm.
BACKGROUNDGhaderi A, Kadesjo C, Bjornsdotter A, Enebrink P. Randomized effectiveness Trial of the Family Check-Up versus Internet-delivered Parent Training (iComet) for Families of Children with Conduct Problems. Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 31;8(1):11486. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29550-z.
PMID: 30065246BACKGROUNDGoodman R. Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001 Nov;40(11):1337-45. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200111000-00015.
PMID: 11699809BACKGROUNDHogstrom J, Olofsson V, Ozdemir M, Enebrink P, Stattin H. Two-Year Findings from a National Effectiveness Trial: Effectiveness of Behavioral and Non-Behavioral Parenting Programs. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2017 Apr;45(3):527-542. doi: 10.1007/s10802-016-0178-0.
PMID: 27334706BACKGROUNDJulious SA. Sample sizes for clinical trials with normal data. Stat Med. 2004 Jun 30;23(12):1921-86. doi: 10.1002/sim.1783.
PMID: 15195324BACKGROUNDKling A, Forster M, Sundell K, Melin L. A randomized controlled effectiveness trial of parent management training with varying degrees of therapist support. Behav Ther. 2010 Dec;41(4):530-42. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2010.02.004. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
PMID: 21035616BACKGROUNDMcEachern AD, Dishion TJ, Weaver CM, Shaw DS, Wilson MN, Gardner F. Parenting Young Children (PARYC): Validation of a Self-Report Parenting Measure. J Child Fam Stud. 2012 Jun;21(3):498-511. doi: 10.1007/s10826-011-9503-y.
PMID: 22876108BACKGROUNDNordin M, Nordin S. Psychometric evaluation and normative data of the Swedish version of the 10-item perceived stress scale. Scand J Psychol. 2013 Dec;54(6):502-7. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12071. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
PMID: 24118069BACKGROUNDSampaio F, Enebrink P, Mihalopoulos C, Feldman I. Cost-Effectiveness of Four Parenting Programs and Bibliotherapy for Parents of Children with Conduct Problems. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2016 Dec 1;19(4):201-212.
PMID: 27991419BACKGROUNDSchumi J, Wittes JT. Through the looking glass: understanding non-inferiority. Trials. 2011 May 3;12:106. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-106.
PMID: 21539749BACKGROUNDSheehan DV, Sheehan KH, Shytle RD, Janavs J, Bannon Y, Rogers JE, Milo KM, Stock SL, Wilkinson B. Reliability and validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (MINI-KID). J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Mar;71(3):313-26. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05305whi.
PMID: 20331933BACKGROUNDSocialstyrelsen. (2009). Socialtjänstens öppna verksamheter för barn och unga - en nationell inventering av metoder. Stockholm.
BACKGROUNDStattin H, Enebrink P, Ozdemir M, Giannotta F. A national evaluation of parenting programs in Sweden: The short-term effects using an RCT effectiveness design. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Dec;83(6):1069-1084. doi: 10.1037/a0039328. Epub 2015 May 25.
PMID: 26009784BACKGROUNDTitov N, Dear BF, McMillan D, Anderson T, Zou J, Sunderland M. Psychometric comparison of the PHQ-9 and BDI-II for measuring response during treatment of depression. Cogn Behav Ther. 2011;40(2):126-36. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2010.550059.
PMID: 25155813BACKGROUNDTrentacosta CJ, Criss MM, Shaw DS, Lacourse E, Hyde LW, Dishion TJ. Antecedents and outcomes of joint trajectories of mother-son conflict and warmth during middle childhood and adolescence. Child Dev. 2011 Sep-Oct;82(5):1676-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01626.x. Epub 2011 Aug 29.
PMID: 21883153BACKGROUNDVårdgivarguiden. (2017). Vägledningsdokument: Utagerande beteende hos barn och unga med psykisk ohälsa.
BACKGROUNDEngelbrektsson J, Salomonsson S, Hogstrom J, Sorjonen K, Sundell K, Forster M. Parent Training via Internet or in Group for Disruptive Behaviors: A Randomized Clinical Noninferiority Trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 Sep;62(9):987-997. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2023.01.019. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
PMID: 36863414DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Martin Forster, PhD
Karolinska Institutet
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Independent clinicians will perform diagnostic assessments at pre and post measurements. The clinicians will be blind to the experimental condition the participants they assess.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 1, 2018
First Posted
March 14, 2018
Study Start
March 19, 2018
Primary Completion
November 20, 2020
Study Completion
December 20, 2021
Last Updated
March 10, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03