Evaluation of Candida Albicans Growth on BreFlex Versus PEEK Denture Base in Maxillary Bounded Partial Denture
1 other identifier
interventional
18
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study evaluate Candida Albicans growth on Bre-Flex versus PEEK denture base in Bilateral Maxillary bounded partial denture , half of patients will receive a framework with breflex denture base and the other half will receive a framework with PEEK denture base then evaluate the Candida growth
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 22, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 13, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 28, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 22, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2018
CompletedMarch 13, 2018
March 1, 2018
24 days
February 22, 2018
March 6, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Candida Albicans growth
after insertion of the denture we will measure the Candida count using Light Microscope and record the CFU/ML (colony-forming units per milliliter) unit
one month
Study Arms (2)
Group 1
EXPERIMENTALpatients will receive partial denture constructed from PEEK material
Group 2
ACTIVE COMPARATORpatients will receive partial denture constructed from breflex material
Interventions
PEEK has been successfully used over the last years in the medical field, and orthopedics, specifically. which presents high bio compatibility, good mechanical properties, high temperature resistance, and chemical stability due to a 4 GPa modulus of elasticity, it is as elastic as bone and can reduce stresses transferred to the abutment teeth.Additional advantages of this polymer material are elimination of allergic reactions and metallic taste, high polishing qualities, low plaque affinity, and good wear resistance, it has only recently been used in dentistry.
In the recent time thermoplastic materials become quite popular in clinical practice such as nylon and acetal resins. since the 1950, poly-amide resin (nylons) provide improved esthetics and reduction of rotational forces on the abutment teeth due to their low elastic modulus(3). The major disadvantage of a nylon removable denture is the inability for a reline procedure and the lack of occlusal rests as well as rigid frameworks, that could lead to occlusal instability and sinking, especially in Kennedy class I and II cases. On the other hand, acetal resins present adequate mechanical strength to form a frame-work more rigid than nylon with retentive clasps, connectors, and supportive elements; however, the acetal resin material lacks natural translucency and vitality.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients must have Kennedy class III modification I upper partially edentulous ridges.
- The remaining teeth have good periodontal condition, with no signs of attrition or gingival recession.
- Male or female patient with age range (30-55) and in good medical condition
- All patients have skeletal Angle's class I maxillo-mandibular relationship and have sufficient interarch distance.
- Free from any systemic or neuromuscular disorder that might affect chewing efficiency of masticatory muscles.
- Free from any tempo-mandibular joint disorder.
- The patients have good oral hygiene and low caries index.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients having abnormal habits as bruxism or clenching
- Patients having hormonal disorders as diabetes, thyroid or parathyroid hormonal diseases were not included.
- Teeth with compromised bone support.
- Patient with xerostomia or excessive salivation.
- Patient with abnormal tongue behavior and/or size.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Related Publications (5)
de Freitas Fernandes FS, Pereira-Cenci T, da Silva WJ, Filho AP, Straioto FG, Del Bel Cury AA. Efficacy of denture cleansers on Candida spp. biofilm formed on polyamide and polymethyl methacrylate resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2011 Jan;105(1):51-8. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60192-8.
PMID: 21194588BACKGROUNDGuiotti AM, Goiato MC, Dos Santos DM, Vechiato-Filho AJ, Cunha BG, Paulini MB, Moreno A, de Almeida MT. Comparison of conventional and plant-extract disinfectant solutions on the hardness and color stability of a maxillofacial elastomer after artificial aging. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Apr;115(4):501-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.09.009. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
PMID: 26602149BACKGROUNDParvizi A, Lindquist T, Schneider R, Williamson D, Boyer D, Dawson DV. Comparison of the dimensional accuracy of injection-molded denture base materials to that of conventional pressure-pack acrylic resin. J Prosthodont. 2004 Jun;13(2):83-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04014.x.
PMID: 15210003BACKGROUNDZoidis P, Papathanasiou I, Polyzois G. The Use of a Modified Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) as an Alternative Framework Material for Removable Dental Prostheses. A Clinical Report. J Prosthodont. 2016 Oct;25(7):580-584. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12325. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
PMID: 26216668BACKGROUNDPires FR, Santos EB, Bonan PR, De Almeida OP, Lopes MA. Denture stomatitis and salivary Candida in Brazilian edentulous patients. J Oral Rehabil. 2002 Nov;29(11):1115-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00947.x.
PMID: 12453267BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Nadia Abbas, MD
Cairo University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 22, 2018
First Posted
March 13, 2018
Study Start
June 28, 2018
Primary Completion
July 22, 2018
Study Completion
August 1, 2018
Last Updated
March 13, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03