NCT03462862

Brief Summary

This study evaluate Candida Albicans growth on Bre-Flex versus PEEK denture base in Bilateral Maxillary bounded partial denture , half of patients will receive a framework with breflex denture base and the other half will receive a framework with PEEK denture base then evaluate the Candida growth

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
18

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2018

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 22, 2018

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 13, 2018

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 28, 2018

Completed
24 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 22, 2018

Completed
10 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

March 13, 2018

Status Verified

March 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

24 days

First QC Date

February 22, 2018

Last Update Submit

March 6, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

PEEKBreflex

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Candida Albicans growth

    after insertion of the denture we will measure the Candida count using Light Microscope and record the CFU/ML (colony-forming units per milliliter) unit

    one month

Study Arms (2)

Group 1

EXPERIMENTAL

patients will receive partial denture constructed from PEEK material

Other: PEEK

Group 2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

patients will receive partial denture constructed from breflex material

Other: Bre-Flex

Interventions

PEEKOTHER

PEEK has been successfully used over the last years in the medical field, and orthopedics, specifically. which presents high bio compatibility, good mechanical properties, high temperature resistance, and chemical stability due to a 4 GPa modulus of elasticity, it is as elastic as bone and can reduce stresses transferred to the abutment teeth.Additional advantages of this polymer material are elimination of allergic reactions and metallic taste, high polishing qualities, low plaque affinity, and good wear resistance, it has only recently been used in dentistry.

Group 1

In the recent time thermoplastic materials become quite popular in clinical practice such as nylon and acetal resins. since the 1950, poly-amide resin (nylons) provide improved esthetics and reduction of rotational forces on the abutment teeth due to their low elastic modulus(3). The major disadvantage of a nylon removable denture is the inability for a reline procedure and the lack of occlusal rests as well as rigid frameworks, that could lead to occlusal instability and sinking, especially in Kennedy class I and II cases. On the other hand, acetal resins present adequate mechanical strength to form a frame-work more rigid than nylon with retentive clasps, connectors, and supportive elements; however, the acetal resin material lacks natural translucency and vitality.

Group 2

Eligibility Criteria

Age35 Years - 55 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • All patients must have Kennedy class III modification I upper partially edentulous ridges.
  • The remaining teeth have good periodontal condition, with no signs of attrition or gingival recession.
  • Male or female patient with age range (30-55) and in good medical condition
  • All patients have skeletal Angle's class I maxillo-mandibular relationship and have sufficient interarch distance.
  • Free from any systemic or neuromuscular disorder that might affect chewing efficiency of masticatory muscles.
  • Free from any tempo-mandibular joint disorder.
  • The patients have good oral hygiene and low caries index.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients having abnormal habits as bruxism or clenching
  • Patients having hormonal disorders as diabetes, thyroid or parathyroid hormonal diseases were not included.
  • Teeth with compromised bone support.
  • Patient with xerostomia or excessive salivation.
  • Patient with abnormal tongue behavior and/or size.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (5)

  • de Freitas Fernandes FS, Pereira-Cenci T, da Silva WJ, Filho AP, Straioto FG, Del Bel Cury AA. Efficacy of denture cleansers on Candida spp. biofilm formed on polyamide and polymethyl methacrylate resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2011 Jan;105(1):51-8. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60192-8.

    PMID: 21194588BACKGROUND
  • Guiotti AM, Goiato MC, Dos Santos DM, Vechiato-Filho AJ, Cunha BG, Paulini MB, Moreno A, de Almeida MT. Comparison of conventional and plant-extract disinfectant solutions on the hardness and color stability of a maxillofacial elastomer after artificial aging. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Apr;115(4):501-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.09.009. Epub 2015 Nov 19.

    PMID: 26602149BACKGROUND
  • Parvizi A, Lindquist T, Schneider R, Williamson D, Boyer D, Dawson DV. Comparison of the dimensional accuracy of injection-molded denture base materials to that of conventional pressure-pack acrylic resin. J Prosthodont. 2004 Jun;13(2):83-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04014.x.

    PMID: 15210003BACKGROUND
  • Zoidis P, Papathanasiou I, Polyzois G. The Use of a Modified Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) as an Alternative Framework Material for Removable Dental Prostheses. A Clinical Report. J Prosthodont. 2016 Oct;25(7):580-584. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12325. Epub 2015 Jul 27.

    PMID: 26216668BACKGROUND
  • Pires FR, Santos EB, Bonan PR, De Almeida OP, Lopes MA. Denture stomatitis and salivary Candida in Brazilian edentulous patients. J Oral Rehabil. 2002 Nov;29(11):1115-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00947.x.

    PMID: 12453267BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

polyetheretherketone

Study Officials

  • Nadia Abbas, MD

    Cairo University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: 2 parallel groups one group will receive RPD with PEEK denture base and the other will get Bre Flex denture base material
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2018

First Posted

March 13, 2018

Study Start

June 28, 2018

Primary Completion

July 22, 2018

Study Completion

August 1, 2018

Last Updated

March 13, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-03