NCT03457818

Brief Summary

The goal of the study is to characterize the effect of Prolia® (denosumab) on indices of bone strength in type 2 diabetes (T2D). The investigational plan involves administration of Prolia® or identical placebo for 12 months as a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial in 66 T2D postmenopausal women assigned to Prolia® or placebo. The study will include assessment of different measures of bone quality: skeletal microarchitecture, including measurement of skeletal cortical pores; bone mineral density; bone material quality, and accumulation of advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs) in collagen. This information will help to determine whether Prolia® treatment in type 2 diabetes has skeletal benefits.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
8

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_2 diabetes-mellitus-type-2

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2018

Typical duration for phase_2 diabetes-mellitus-type-2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 18, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 8, 2018

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 7, 2018

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 10, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 10, 2020

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 11, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

July 3, 2024

Status Verified

June 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

January 18, 2018

Results QC Date

April 17, 2021

Last Update Submit

June 6, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

ProliaDenosumabDiabetes

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Cortical Porosity (Ct.Po) (%) by High Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (HR-pQCT) Imaging From Baseline to 6 and 12 Months.

    The primary outcome is the 12 months change in Ct.Po and the primary intent-to-treat analysis is a one-way ANCOVA with the fixed effect of treatment (treated vs. placebo), and baseline Ct.Po as a continuous covariate.

    Baseline, 6 months and 12 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in Serum Collagen Type I C-Telopeptide (s-CTX) (ng/ml) and Tartrate-resistant Acid Phosphatase 5b (TRAP 5b) (ng/ml) by Blood Test From Baseline to 3, 6 and 12 Months.

    Baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months

  • Change in Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) (gm/cm2) at Lumbar Spine, Femoral Neck, Total Hip and Radius From Baseline to 6 and 12 Months.

    Screening visit, 6 months and 12 months

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Skin Autofluorescence (SAF) (Unitless) From Baseline to 6 and 12 Months.

    Baseline, 6 months and 12 months

Study Arms (2)

Treatment Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Denosumab 60 mg/ml \[Prolia\] SC at baseline and 6 months.

Drug: Denosumab 60 mg/ml [Prolia]

Control Group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Placebo SC at Baseline and 6 months.

Other: Placebo

Interventions

Denosumab 60 mg will be administered subcutaneously in the upper arm at the Baseline and 6 Month Visits

Also known as: Prolia®
Treatment Group
PlaceboOTHER

Placebo will be administered subcutaneously in the upper arm at the Baseline and 6 Month Visits

Control Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years - 90 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • An understanding, ability and willingness to fully comply with study procedures and restrictions.
  • Ability to voluntarily provide written, signed and dated informed consent as applicable to participate in the study.
  • Postmenopausal women age ≥ 50 and ≤ 90 years at time of consent.
  • Diagnosis of T2D for ≥ 2 years. Upon review of patient's medical history, patient will be confirmed to currently have reasonably controlled T2D as assessed by the investigator, with HbA1c ≤ 8.4%. If HbA1c is ≥ 8.5%, re-screening will be allowed after approximately 3 months following adjustment of diabetes therapy.
  • DXA T-score ≤ -1.0 at one or more sites (lumbar spine, femoral neck, total hip or distal 1/3 radius).
  • Normal albumin-adjusted serum calcium level.

You may not qualify if:

  • Hormone replacement treatment use (to avoid the influence of estrogen).
  • Fractures (excluding skull, facial bones, metacarpals, fingers, toes, and fractures associated with severe trauma) within 12 months.
  • A history of pathological fractures (eg, due to Paget's disease, myeloma, metastatic malignancy).
  • Type 1 diabetes.
  • Disorders associated with altered skeletal structure or function (chronic renal disease stage 4 or worse, chronic liver disease, malignancy, hypoparathyroidism or hyperparathyroidism, acromegaly, Cushing's syndrome, hypopituitarism, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, alcohol intake \> 3 units/day).
  • Treatment with any of the following drugs in past year: anticonvulsant therapy, pharmacological doses of thyroid hormone (TSH\<normal is permitted if subject has normal T4, clinical euthyroidism and is in steady-state), adrenal or anabolic steroids, calcitonin, estrogen or selective estrogen receptor modulator, sodium fluoride (other than dental treatment), teriparatide, denosumab, abaloparatide, strontium or aromatase inhibitors; any history of bisphosphonate treatment. Corticosteroid use permitted if subject is in steady-state.
  • Serum 25(OH)D levels \< 20 ng/ml. If 25(OH)D levels are \< 20 ng/ml, rescreening will be allowed following a vitamin D loading regimen of 50,000 IU/week for 4 weeks. If serum 25(OH)D levels are ≥ 20 ng/ml after supplementation, the subject will be allowed to enroll.
  • Clinically significant hypersensitivity to denosumab or any components of denosumab 60 mg.
  • Known sensitivity to any of the products to be administered during the study (e.g., calcium or vitamin D).
  • Subject is pregnant or breast feeding, or planning to become pregnant within 5 months after the end of treatment.
  • Female subject of child bearing potential and is not willing to use, in combination with her partner, highly effective contraception during treatment and for 5 months after the end of treatment.
  • Significant dental/oral disease, including prior history or current evidence of osteonecrosis/osteomyelitis of the jaw, or the following:
  • Active dental or jaw condition which requires oral surgery
  • Non-healed dental/oral surgery
  • Planned invasive dental procedures for the course of the study
  • +1 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Columbia University Irving Medical Center - Harkness Pavillion

New York, New York, 10032, United States

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Bonds DE, Larson JC, Schwartz AV, Strotmeyer ES, Robbins J, Rodriguez BL, Johnson KC, Margolis KL. Risk of fracture in women with type 2 diabetes: the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006 Sep;91(9):3404-10. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-0614. Epub 2006 Jun 27.

    PMID: 16804043BACKGROUND
  • Vestergaard P. Discrepancies in bone mineral density and fracture risk in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes--a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. 2007 Apr;18(4):427-44. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0253-4. Epub 2006 Oct 27.

    PMID: 17068657BACKGROUND
  • Furst JR, Bandeira LC, Fan WW, Agarwal S, Nishiyama KK, McMahon DJ, Dworakowski E, Jiang H, Silverberg SJ, Rubin MR. Advanced Glycation Endproducts and Bone Material Strength in Type 2 Diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Jun;101(6):2502-10. doi: 10.1210/jc.2016-1437. Epub 2016 Apr 26.

    PMID: 27115060BACKGROUND
  • Zebaze R, Libanati C, McClung MR, Zanchetta JR, Kendler DL, Hoiseth A, Wang A, Ghasem-Zadeh A, Seeman E. Denosumab Reduces Cortical Porosity of the Proximal Femoral Shaft in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2016 Oct;31(10):1827-1834. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2855. Epub 2016 May 19.

    PMID: 27082709BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2OsteoporosisDiabetes Mellitus

Interventions

Denosumab

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Glucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System DiseasesBone Diseases, MetabolicBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodiesImmunoglobulinsImmunoproteinsBlood ProteinsProteinsAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsSerum GlobulinsGlobulins

Limitations and Caveats

The study was terminated due to poor enrollment compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic. Data was not collected.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Mishaela Rubin
Organization
Columbia University

Study Officials

  • Mishaela Rubin, MD

    Columbia University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
Clinical Research Coordinators
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The study is a 12 month randomized (2:1 assignment) double-blind placebo-controlled trial of T2D postmenopausal women assigned to either Denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously (SC) at baseline and 6 months (n=44) or placebo (n=22); total study n=66.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor of Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 18, 2018

First Posted

March 8, 2018

Study Start

November 7, 2018

Primary Completion

June 10, 2020

Study Completion

June 10, 2020

Last Updated

July 3, 2024

Results First Posted

May 11, 2021

Record last verified: 2024-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations