Shaping Tolerance for Delayed Rewards
DelTA
Feasibility of Shaping Tolerance for Delayed Rewards in Impulsive 3-6 Year Olds
2 other identifiers
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Deficits in self-control are of major public health relevance as they contribute to several negative outcomes for both individuals and society. For children, developing self-control is a critically important step toward success in academic settings and social relationships, yet there are few non-pharmacological approaches that have been successful in increasing self-control. We found in our earlier studies that self-control can be increased in preschool-aged children with high impulsivity by using games in which they practice gradually increasing wait-time for larger, more delayed rewards. We are performing this current study to test if this training to increase self-control can be increased using mobile app technology, with computerized game time being used as a reward.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 12, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 7, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2026
CompletedJuly 14, 2025
July 1, 2025
8.6 years
March 1, 2018
July 10, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Indifference point
The indifference point on the tablet-task assessment is defined as the delay interval at which the child chooses 50% longer, larger rewards and 50% shorter, smaller rewards. Investigators hypothesize that the shaping group will have greater increases in their indifference points than the waitlist control group.
Up to 6 weeks
Percent change in preference for longer, larger (LL) rewards
The percentage of trials in which the child selects the longer, larger (LL) reward option during the tablet-task assessment will be recorded. Investigators hypothesize that the shaping group will have greater increases in the percentage of trials for which they choose the LL rewards compared to the waitlist control group.
Up to 6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (6)
ADHD-RS-IV Preschool Version and Attention and Behavior Rating Form
Up to 6 weeks
The Preschool Life Skills Questionnaire
Up to 6 weeks
The Children's Behavior Questionnaire (CBQ)
Up to 6 weeks
Snack Delay Task
Up to 6 weeks
Dinky Toy Task
Up to 6 weeks
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Treatment
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in the Experimental arm will begin the Shaping Delay Tolerance behavioral intervention immediately after baseline, and this training will last for about 6 weeks.
Wait-list Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter baseline, participants in the Wait-list Control arm will wait for about 6-weeks before entering the pre-treatment phase, which is a repeat of effortful control assessments and behavior questionnaires, and then they will begin training for with the Shaping Delay Tolerance behavioral intervention.
Interventions
Participants will be introduced to an adaptive tablet-based application that asks the child to choose between two options: 1) a shorter duration of game play that begins immediately, or 2) a longer duration of game play that begins after a delay. Depending on the child's choices, the application alters the pre-reward delay with the intent of training the child to tolerate longer delays for larger rewards (i.e., more game play). Children may participate in up to 25 approximately 30-minute training sessions over 3-6 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 3-6 years
- Hyperactivity/Impulsivity subscale scores of the ADHD Rating Scale-IV Preschool Version (children 3 to 4 years of age) or the Attention and Behavior Scale (children 5 to 6 years of age) ≥ 90th percentile from either the parent or teacher's responses
- Physically and visually able to use the tablet, as determined by pre-assessment performance
- Children taking psychotropic medication will be included, but must maintain the same medication and dose over the course of the study and for each assessment and exhibit elevated levels of impulsivity based on parent or teacher ratings while medicated.
You may not qualify if:
- Children with autism spectrum disorder and/or intellectual disability (by parent or teacher report or the NIH Toolbox Picture Vocabulary Test).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UC Davis MIND Institute
Sacramento, California, 95817, United States
Related Publications (10)
Schweitzer JB, Sulzer-Azaroff B. Self-control: teaching tolerance for delay in impulsive children. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Sep;50(2):173-86. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.50-173.
PMID: 3193054BACKGROUNDSchweitzer JB, Sulzer-Azaroff B. Self-control in boys with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: effects of added stimulation and time. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1995 May;36(4):671-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1995.tb02321.x.
PMID: 7650090BACKGROUNDMcGoey KE, DuPaul GJ, Haley E, et al. Parent and teacher ratings of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in preschool: the ADHD Rating Scale-IV Preschool Version. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2007;29:269.
BACKGROUNDDunn LM, Dunn DM. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test - Fourth Edition (PPVT-4). 2006. Toronto; Pearson: 2006.
BACKGROUNDHanley GP, Heal NA, Tiger JH, Ingvarsson ET. Evaluation of a class wide teaching program for developing preschool life skills. J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Summer;40(2):277-300. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.57-06.
PMID: 17624068BACKGROUNDRothbart MK, Ahadi SA, Hershey KL, Fisher P. Investigations of temperament at three to seven years: the Children's Behavior Questionnaire. Child Dev. 2001 Sep-Oct;72(5):1394-408. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00355.
PMID: 11699677BACKGROUNDPutnam SP, Rothbart MK. Development of short and very short forms of the Children's Behavior Questionnaire. J Pers Assess. 2006 Aug;87(1):102-12. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_09.
PMID: 16856791BACKGROUNDGagne JR, Van Hulle CA, Aksan N, Essex MJ, Goldsmith HH. Deriving childhood temperament measures from emotion-eliciting behavioral episodes: scale construction and initial validation. Psychol Assess. 2011 Jun;23(2):337-53. doi: 10.1037/a0021746.
PMID: 21480723BACKGROUNDLaird NM, Ware JH. Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics. 1982 Dec;38(4):963-74.
PMID: 7168798BACKGROUNDLiang K, Zeger S. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73:13-22; 1986.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Julie Schweitzer, Ph.D.
UC Davis MIND Institute
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Care Providers are told about the two possible groups during the Consent and will be aware of their child's assignment in terms of whether the child begins treatment immediately after baseline or has to wait 6 weeks prior to treatment. Members of the research team who are designated as video coders for the Effortful Control tasks will be blind to the group assignment of the participants in the video recordings.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 1, 2018
First Posted
March 7, 2018
Study Start
September 12, 2017
Primary Completion
May 1, 2026
Study Completion
May 1, 2026
Last Updated
July 14, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07