Comparison of the Onset Times and Durations of Actions of Different Local Anesthetic Mixture Solutions [CODLAM]
CODLAM
1 other identifier
interventional
85
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Objective To investigate the onset times and duration of local anesthetic mixture solutions used for axillary-supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks and to compare the quality of anesthesia in patients with trauma of the upper limb. Design Randomized-prospective, observational study. Setting Perioperative, Trauma Clinic, University of Pecs, Hungary. Participants 85 consecutive, unpremedicated ASA physical status I-III patients, between the ages of 19 and 83, scheduled for trauma surgery of the hand and forearm. Interventions Patients assigned to four groups for standardized ultrasound guided axillary-supraclavicular block with lidocaine 1% and bupivacaine 0,5% 1:1 mixture (Group LB, n = 17) or bupivacaine 0.33% (Group BS, n = 14) or lidocaine 0,66% (Group LS, n = 14) or bupivacaine 0.5% and lidocaine 1% 2:1 mixture (Group BL, n = 40). Total target volume of 0.4 ml/kg was administered to both groups. Measurements Data were collected on patient demographics, the onset times and the duration of actions of local anesthetic mixtures were measured, the tourniquet discomfort, vital parameters, pre and postoperative verbal numeric rating scale of pain intensity, anxiolytic/analgesic consumption and the complications were recorded. The quality of anesthesia was assessed by a sensory-motor-coping-pain scale (0-16).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 17, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 15, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 16, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 6, 2018
CompletedMarch 13, 2018
March 1, 2018
7 months
February 16, 2018
March 11, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
onset time
Complete sensory block was defined by loss of sensation of filament prick and touch on all four nerve distribution. Complete motor block was defined by the loss of thumb abduction, thumb adduction, thumb opposition, and flexion at elbow.
0-30 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (3)
duration of action
1-22 hours
The outcome quality of BPB.
24-48 hours
Success rate of BPB.
3-14 days
Study Arms (4)
LB Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORUltrasound-guided brachial plexus block for LB Group (15 ml lidocaine 1% + 15 ml bupivacaine 0.5%)
BS Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORUltrasound-guided brachial plexus block for BS Group (20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% + 10 ml normal saline)
LS Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORUltrasound-guided brachial plexus block for LS Group (20 ml lidocaine 1% + 10 ml normal saline)
BL Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORand Ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block for BL Group (20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% + 10 ml lidocaine 1%)
Interventions
Standardized UG AX-SC approach to the BP was performed under sterile conditions by the same anesthesiologist. SC block was performed with the traditional in-plane, single injection cluster approach, then AX approach was performed in the supine position, with a standardized dose of 0.4 ml/kg BW
Standardized UG AX-SC approach to the BP was performed under sterile conditions by the same anesthesiologist. SC block was performed with the traditional in-plane, single injection cluster approach, then AX approach was performed in the supine position, with a standardized dose of 0.4 ml/kg BW
Standardized UG AX-SC approach to the BP was performed under sterile conditions by the same anesthesiologist. SC block was performed with the traditional in-plane, single injection cluster approach, then AX approach was performed in the supine position, with a standardized dose of 0.4 ml/kg BW
Standardized UG AX-SC approach to the BP was performed under sterile conditions by the same anesthesiologist. SC block was performed with the traditional in-plane, single injection cluster approach, then AX approach was performed in the supine position, with a standardized dose of 0.4 ml/kg BW
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- elective or emergency trauma surgery of hand or forearm
- consented to ultrasound-guided BPB
You may not qualify if:
- continuous peripheral nerve catheter technique or bilateral block was planned
- the patient refused to participate
- psycho-mental conditions interfering with consent or assessment
- pre-existing chronic pain condition or daily analgesic or sedative consumption
- sedative or analgesic premedication
- pre-existing neurological disorders affecting the brachial plexus
- obstructive sleep apnea
- contraindications to PNB including local skin infections or allergy to LA agents.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Pecslead
- Medical University of Pecscollaborator
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Lajos Bogar, Prof
Department of Anesth.and Int Care,University of Pecs, Medical School
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Patients, the operating team, nurses, and observers involved in the quality assessment of blocks and the follow-up data collection were unaware of group allocation. The research coordinator after the BPB was not present in the operating theatre at the time of tourniquet inflation and the beginning of the surgery. The intra- and postoperative parameters, drug consumptions and VNR values were collected and matched retrospectively, the list of cases was provided in the form of a spreadsheet program by an observer-blinded assistant and was statistically evaluated by an independent analyst.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 16, 2018
First Posted
March 6, 2018
Study Start
January 17, 2017
Primary Completion
August 15, 2017
Study Completion
November 30, 2017
Last Updated
March 13, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03