XPAND Trial: Enhancing XP Photoprotection Activities - New Directions
XPAND
The XPAND Evaluation of a Personalised Adherence Intervention to Improve Photoprotection Behaviour in Adults With Xeroderma Pigmentosum (XP): Randomised Controlled Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
People with Xeroderma Pigmentosum (XP) have a genetic condition which stops their skin repairing damage from Ultraviolet Radiation (UVR). This means they are much more likely to develop potentially fatal skin cancers. The only way to reduce this damage is to rigorously protect the skin, by limiting UVR exposure. This done in a number of ways including: staying indoors; wearing protective clothing, sunscreen and glasses. People with XP can find it difficult to maintain this level of protection, putting themselves at risk. This research will test whether an intervention designed to enhance photoprotection activities is successful. It will use a randomised controlled trial design to compare the amount of UVR reaching the face, between participants receiving the intervention and those receiving standard clinical care. The amount of UVR reaching the face is important, as this is where people with XP develop most cancers. It is dependent on the overall level of exposure to UVR in the environment, and photoprotection used. The intervention involves a tailored conversation with the participant about their photoprotection practices. It will target both the overall exposure to UVR and the photoprotection used when outdoors, and will be conducted in 7 sessions with an intervention facilitator. The content will be dependent on the specific photoprotection behaviour being targeted (e.g., poor sunscreen application) and the reasons for poor photoprotection for each person. This could be low motivation related to doubts about the need to protect and concerns about protecting. Other barriers to protection might be lack of routines. The facilitator will provide information tailored to these beliefs and use other standard behaviour change techniques to encourage the development of "better" photoprotection habits. The investigators predict that the intervention group will have a lower mean daily dose of UVR to the face compared to the control group in two time periods in the summer months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 7, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 26, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 30, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2020
CompletedJuly 22, 2020
July 1, 2020
1.8 years
February 7, 2018
July 21, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean daily dose of ultraviolet radiation (UVR) to the face using a dosimeter and diary.
The mean daily dose of UVR will be calculated by combining data from: (i) A UVR recorder wrist-worn device, (dosimeter) (ii) Patients' photoprotective activities self-monitored and recorded on a diary. The dosimeter provides real-time measurements of ambient UVR. It measures UVR in units of Standard Erythemal Dose (SEDs), every 5 seconds and records the mean every 5 minutes. The diary has a grid format with the day split into 15 minute segments. Participants record time spent outside rounded to the nearest 15 minutes and their photoprotection activity (e.g. hat, hoodie worn-up) during that time. During each 15 minute interval the dose of UVR to the face (in SEDs) equals the UVR exposure recorded by the dosimeter weighted by the protection associated with photoprotection behaviours recorded for that interval on the diary. Weights will be generated based on the degree of photoprotection afforded by each activity.
It will measured in all participants for 21 days at 10 weeks post baseline
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Mean daily mood
It will measured in all participants for 21 days at 3 time periods: baseline, 10 weeks and 16 weeks post baseline. The control group will complete a 21 day follow-up at 12 months (52 weeks) and 14.5 months (62 weeks) post baseline.
Mean daily automaticity of UVR protection activity
It will measured in all participants for 21 days at 3 time periods: baseline, 10 weeks and 16 weeks post baseline. The control group will complete a 21 day follow-up at 12 months (52 weeks) and 14.5 months (62 weeks) post baseline.
Mean daily prioritisation of UVR protection activity
It will measured in all participants for 21 days at 3 time periods: baseline, 10 weeks and 16 weeks post baseline. The control group will complete a 21 day follow-up at 12 months (52 weeks) and 14.5 months (62 weeks) post baseline.
Mean daily self-efficacy for UVR protection in the presence of barriers
It will measured in all participants for 21 days at 3 time periods: baseline, 10 weeks and 16 weeks post baseline. The control group will complete a 21 day follow-up at 12 months (52 weeks) and 14.5 months (62 weeks) post baseline.
EuroQoL five dimensions scale (EQ-5D-5L)
This will be measured on single occasions: baseline, 10 weeks, 16 weeks, 36 weeks post baseline. The control group will complete follow-up at 12 months (52 weeks),14.5 months (62 weeks) and 21 months (84 weeks) post baseline.
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (4)
Qualitative evaluation of the intervention from the perspective of the patient
They will be conducted after the 16 weeks post baseline assessement (intervention group) and post 17 months (control group)
Self report Intervention Feedback questionnaire
It will be completed post intervention at 16 weeks follow-up (intervention group) and for the control group at 14.5 months (68 weeks)
Profiling questionnaire
At baseline, 36 weeks post baseline. Control group will complete at 12 months (52 weeks) and 21 months (84 weeks) post baseline. Individual items will be used during qualitative interview.
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
2018 XPAND Intervention Arm
EXPERIMENTALThis group will receive the personalised adherence intervention in 2018 in addition to routine clinical care.
2018 XPAND Control Arm
NO INTERVENTIONThis group will receive routine clinical care and act as the control group for the primary objective: To compare the mean daily dose of UVR (SEDs) reaching the face between the intervention group and control group over a 3 week period in June to July (follow-up 1). This group will receive the intervention in 2019, to allow within group change to be assessed.
Interventions
The intervention is personalised to the psychosocial factors influencing poor photoprotection for each person. These factors could include beliefs that reduce motivation to protect as well as factors that prevent intentions being translated into action. The facilitator will use behaviour change techniques to target the factor most important for each person. Standardised content related to habit formation will be received. The intervention will be delivered via 7 1:1 sessions with a facilitator (psychologists or clinical nurse specialist). Sessions 1 (1.5 hours maximum) and 6 (45 minutes) will be delivered face to face in the home of the participant and the remaining sessions will be conducted via telephone calls or skype sessions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- A confirmed diagnosis (on the basis of DNA repair study results) of Xeroderma Pigmentosum
- Age \>16 years
- Sub-optimal adherence to photoprotection when outdoors, identified by clinical team from data held in medical notes.
- For those who participated in our previous research study, sub-optimal adherence will be confirmed from data collected during that study. They will be eligible if they meet any of the following criteria:
- Score \<20 on the Adherence to Photoprotection scale (total score is 25 - optimal protection) from a cross-sectional questionnaire completed during our previous research.
- Using photoprotective clothing that have been assessed by the clinical team as anything other than "very good or excellent" on anytime outdoors, recorded on the daily UVR protection diary.
- Having a "resistant" mode of adjustment to photoprotection in the qualitative analysis
You may not qualify if:
- Adults diagnosed with cognitive impairment
- Adults with inadequate English to be able to converse with the intervention facilitators
- Adults diagnosed with current clinical depression or anxiety
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trustlead
- King's College Londoncollaborator
- Newcastle Universitycollaborator
- University of Cambridgecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Guy's St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
London, SE1 7EH, United Kingdom
Related Publications (2)
Walburn J, Sarkany R, Norton S, Foster L, Morgan M, Sainsbury K, Araujo-Soares V, Anderson R, Garrood I, Heydenreich J, Sniehotta FF, Vieira R, Wulf HC, Weinman J. An investigation of the predictors of photoprotection and UVR dose to the face in patients with XP: a protocol using observational mixed methods. BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 21;7(8):e018364. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018364.
PMID: 28827277BACKGROUNDWalburn J, Norton S, Sarkany R, Sainsbury K, Araujo-Soares V, Morgan M, Canfield M, Foster L, Heydenreich J, McCrone P, Mander A, Sniehotta FF, Wulf HC, Weinman J. Evaluation of a personalised adherence intervention to improve photoprotection in adults with Xeroderma Pigmentosum (XP): protocol for the trial of XPAND. BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 17;9(7):e028577. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028577.
PMID: 31320353DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Robert Sarkany, FRCP MD CCST
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John Weinman, PhD, FbPsS
King's College London
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Group Allocation will be concealed from the statisticians conducting the analysis until the analysis relevant to the primary study objective has been completed. Care providers: Group allocation will be concealed from the XP clinical team who are not part of the research team. This is to avoid change in the standard care of these participants during the trial (i.e., greater/less discussion of adherence to photoprotection during the routine clinical appointment). Randomisation will be broken if the intervention facilitator is concerned about the participant's emotional wellbeing at any point during delivering the intervention. In this case the clinical team will be alerted and the participant will be referred to the clinical psychologist at the XP service for assessment.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 7, 2018
First Posted
February 26, 2018
Study Start
March 30, 2018
Primary Completion
December 30, 2019
Study Completion
January 30, 2020
Last Updated
July 22, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is no plan to make participant data available to other researchers.