Study Stopped
Insufficient resources to complete study requirements
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Paravertebral Block in Mastectomy
Ultrasound-guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block Versus Ultrasound-guided Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block for Pain Management After Unilateral Total Mastectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
In this randomized, controlled, observer-blinded study the investigators plan to evaluate ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) and ultrasound-guided thoracic erector spinae plane (TESP) block for postoperative pain management after unilateral total mastectomy without immediate reconstruction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Aug 2018
Typical duration for phase_4 postoperative-pain
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 20, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 6, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2020
CompletedOctober 12, 2018
October 1, 2018
2 years
March 20, 2018
October 9, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Pain
Pain score via Numeric Rating Scale (0-10)
2 hours after surgery
Opioid Use
Cumulative opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents (mg)
24 hours after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Pain
6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery
Opioid morbidity
2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery
Procedural morbidity
2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery
Time
preoperative
Study Arms (2)
Paravertebral Block
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor this arm, the initial level will be at T3-4 and an out-of-plane technique to guide the needle tip to a point between the costotransverse ligament and the parietal pleura between the visualized transverse processes. Then, a few milliliters of 0.5% ropivacaine will be injected slowly to displace the pleura ventrally as the paravertebral space fills with local anesthetic. After negative aspiration, the rest of 0.5% ropivacaine (total 10 ml) will be injected in 5 ml increments to further fill the paravertebral space. The procedure will then be repeated in the same exact fashion at the T5-6 level. We will observe local anesthetic spread under real-time ultrasound imaging.
Erector Spinae Plane Block
EXPERIMENTALFor this arm, the needle tip will be directed under ultrasound guidance using an in-plane technique towards the T5 transverse process until the needle tip contacts os. Then, a few milliliters of ropivacaine will be injected slowly to separate the plane between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process. After negative aspiration, the rest of the 0.5% ropivacaine will be injected (total 20ml)
Interventions
A relatively recent alternative to the paravertebral block is the thoracic erector spinae plane block, which involves the ultrasound-guided injection of local anesthetic into the interfascial plane deep to the erector spinae muscle at the level of the transverse process. It results in a loss of somatic sensory sensation across multiple unilateral dermatomes due to local anesthetic mediated blockade of the dorsal and ventral rami of the spinal nerve roots. It is increasingly being used due to ease of placing the block and a perception of greater safety. It has been shown to provide pain relief from rib fractures, thoracotomy, and chronic neuropathic pain of the chest wall. However, to date, erector spinae plane block has not been compared with paravertebral block in regards to analgesia with mastectomy surgery, which has been extensively studied.
Paravertebral block is a classic regional anesthesia technique that has been in use for over 100 years. It is performed by the injection of local anesthetic into the space between the costotransverse ligament and parietal pleura resulting in blockade of ipsilateral intercostal nerves. It results in a loss of somatic sensation over multiple unilateral dermatomes.
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John C Alexander, MD
University of Texas
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The practitioner must know which block to perform, and the patient will be able to deduce which block was performed because paravertebral requires two injections, and erector spinae requires only one injection. The outcomes assessor will not know which group each patient is in.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 20, 2018
First Posted
April 6, 2018
Study Start
August 1, 2018
Primary Completion
August 1, 2020
Study Completion
October 1, 2020
Last Updated
October 12, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share