NCT03437512

Brief Summary

Research studies in stuttering have shown that activity patterns in certain brain areas differ in people who stutter compared to people who do not stutter when speaking. The purpose of this study is to investigate how mild, non-invasive brain stimulation applied consecutively for five days affects speech relevant brain areas, which may in turn affect speech fluency and speaking-related brain activity in people who stutter.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
29

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 12, 2018

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 19, 2018

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 25, 2018

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2020

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 29, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

April 29, 2021

Status Verified

April 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

February 12, 2018

Results QC Date

March 29, 2021

Last Update Submit

April 28, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

transcranial direct current stimulationMRISpeechfluencytDCS

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Changes in Brain Activation as Assessed by fMRI Images

    Investigators will use the fMRI images taken from before and after tDCS to determine if the treatment intervention contributed to any changes within brain regions associated with speech production. This will be measured by Blood-Oxygen-Level-Dependent (BOLD) signal change (arbitrary units). Images from scans are preprocessed. Changes in BOLD signal are modeled for contrasts within a group for \[post-pre\] and \[follow up-pre\] (e.g., active group reading condition post visit MINUS active group reading pre visit). Results are reported for reading condition.

    Baseline, 1 week (post), 4 weeks (follow up)

  • Change in Percentage of Stuttered Syllables Produced During Speech Sample

    Investigators will calculate the percentage of stuttered syllables (out of total syllables) in a speech sample. Decreased stuttered syllables represents better outcomes (greater reduction in stuttering).

    Baseline, 1 week (post), 4 weeks (follow up)

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Changes From Baseline on the Overall Assessment of Speakers Experience of Stuttering (OASES)

    Baseline, 1 week (post), 4 weeks (follow up)

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Changes From Baseline on Rhythm Judgement Task

    Baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks

  • Changes From Baseline on Tapping Tasks

    Baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks

  • Changes From Baseline on Self-rated Measure of Speech Fluency

    Baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Active tDCS and fluency training

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will receive anodal tDCS at 2milliampere (mA) intensity for 20 minutes during speech fluency training (5 consecutive days).

Device: Anodal tDCSBehavioral: Fluency training

Sham tDCS and fluency training

SHAM COMPARATOR

Participants will receive sham tDCS. Sham stimulation will involve 30 seconds of stimulation at the beginning of the 20 minutes of speech fluency training (5 consecutive days).

Behavioral: Fluency trainingDevice: Sham tDCS

Interventions

20 minutes of 2mA anodal stimulation.

Active tDCS and fluency training

Speaking along with a metronome and/or speaking along with another person (choral speech) for 20 minutes

Active tDCS and fluency trainingSham tDCS and fluency training
Sham tDCSDEVICE

For sham stimulation, current is ramped up and back down over 30 seconds.

Sham tDCS and fluency training

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • history of persistent developmental stuttering
  • stuttering severity ranging from mild to very severe, specifically Stuttering Severity Instrument (SSI) total score of 20 (mild) or higher and stuttering rates of 3% or higher
  • scores within 1 standard deviation of the norm on the standardized tests for the study

You may not qualify if:

  • received any treatment for stuttering within the past year
  • other neurological conditions such as Tourette's syndrome or post-traumatic stress disorder
  • taking any medications/drugs that affect brain function
  • history of past or current mental illness for example, schizophrenia that may affect brain development and function
  • history of serious medical or neurological illness such as epilepsy and Parkinson's disease
  • history of closed head injury (e.g., concussion)
  • history of reading disorders
  • hearing loss
  • taking any medication, prescription or non-prescription with any psychotropic effects at the time of the study
  • metal or electronic implants such as cochlear implants, and pacemakers

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48105, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

StutteringSpeech

Interventions

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Speech DisordersLanguage DisordersCommunication DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsVerbal BehaviorCommunicationBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Electric Stimulation TherapyTherapeuticsConvulsive TherapyPsychiatric Somatic TherapiesBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesElectroshockPsychological Techniques

Limitations and Caveats

Study was terminated early due to pandemic research pause, which resulted in fewer enrolled subjects than anticipated, which affected the number of subjects that could be analyzed.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Emily O. Garnett, PhD, CCC-SLP
Organization
University of Michigan

Study Officials

  • Emily O Garnett, PhD

    University of Michigan

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
A researcher who is not involved in any aspect of the study will randomize participants into the sham and active study arms using a minimization procedure. Allocation concealment will be achieved by assigning a unique 6-digit random code per participant, which will be provided to the researcher. The code is used to deliver stimulation. The participants and the researchers who deliver stimulation, assess outcomes, and analyze data will be masked to trial arm.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Research Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2018

First Posted

February 19, 2018

Study Start

June 25, 2018

Primary Completion

April 1, 2020

Study Completion

April 1, 2020

Last Updated

April 29, 2021

Results First Posted

April 29, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-04

Locations