NCT03434847

Brief Summary

Prospective, randomized, single-blind study, whether perioperative educational improves pain-related postoperative outcomes,

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
5

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2017

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 21, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 14, 2017

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 16, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 16, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 15, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

August 28, 2018

Status Verified

August 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

December 14, 2017

Last Update Submit

August 24, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Does perioperative education improve satisfaction with postoperative pain control at discharge?

    The satisfaction with postoperative pain control will be assessed using an initial, post-operative and discharge questionnaire of participant's pain level, medications (if any) to manage pain, the affects of that pain management, and participant satisfaction of that pain control.

    Upon discharge, Day 1 - Day 7

Study Arms (2)

Control

NO INTERVENTION

Standard preoperative assessment

Education

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Pre-operative education regarding post-operative pain expectations

Other: Education

Interventions

Participants who receive perioperative educational to address their expectation about their postoperative pain will have improved pain-related postoperative outcomes.

Education

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age \> 18 years
  • Undergoing open colorectal surgery Able to understand and sign and informed consent form

You may not qualify if:

  • Age \< 18 years
  • Unable to complete post-operative CMS questionnaire
  • Inability to understand the English language Absolute contraindication to epidural placement (patient refusal, requiring resumption of therapeutic anticoagulation after surgery, anaphylaxis to local anesthetics, local or systemic infections, bleeding diathesis)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Washington University in St. Louis

St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Koenen P, Bathis H, Schneider MM, Frohlich M, Bouillon B, Shafizadeh S. How do we face patients' expectations in joint arthroplasty? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Jul;134(7):925-31. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-2012-x. Epub 2014 May 24.

    PMID: 24858373BACKGROUND
  • Ghomrawi HM, Mancuso CA, Westrich GH, Marx RG, Mushlin AI; Expectations Discordance Study Group. Discordance in TKA expectations between patients and surgeons. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jan;471(1):175-80. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2484-3.

    PMID: 22821348BACKGROUND
  • Waljee J, McGlinn EP, Sears ED, Chung KC. Patient expectations and patient-reported outcomes in surgery: a systematic review. Surgery. 2014 May;155(5):799-808. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.015. Epub 2013 Dec 16.

    PMID: 24787107BACKGROUND
  • Shuldham C. A review of the impact of pre-operative education on recovery from surgery. Int J Nurs Stud. 1999 Apr;36(2):171-7. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(99)00010-3.

    PMID: 10376227BACKGROUND
  • Snyder-Ramos SA, Seintsch H, Bottiger BW, Motsch J, Martin E, Bauer M. Patient satisfaction and information gain after the preanesthetic visit: a comparison of face-to-face interview, brochure, and video. Anesth Analg. 2005 Jun;100(6):1753-1758. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000153010.49776.E5.

    PMID: 15920209BACKGROUND
  • Kaur H, Singh G, Singh A, Sharda G, Aggarwal S. Evolving with modern technology: Impact of incorporating audiovisual aids in preanesthetic checkup clinics on patient education and anxiety. Anesth Essays Res. 2016 Sep-Dec;10(3):502-507. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.177187.

    PMID: 27746541BACKGROUND
  • Noorian C, Aein F. Comparative investigation of the effectiveness of face-to-face verbal training and educational pamphlets on readiness of patients before undergoing non-emergency surgeries. J Educ Health Promot. 2015 May 19;4:45. doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.157231. eCollection 2015.

    PMID: 26097859BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Interventions

Educational Status

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Socioeconomic FactorsPopulation Characteristics

Study Officials

  • Michael Bottros, MD

    Washington University School of Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
At enrollment, each patient will be assigned a study number, which will match a previously prepared computer-generated list of randomization numbers to determine whether they will be in the intervention or control arm. Pre-operatively, all patients will complete an initial questionnaire. The patients in the intervention group (n=50) will, in addition to the standard pre-operative assessment, also receive pre-operative educational instruction of what to expect from a post-operative pain perspective including education material to take home. For this study, we will be using deception, with the reasoning that the patients' knowledge of the different education materials will affect their rating of the impact of the intervention on satisfaction scores.
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Prospective, randomized, single-blind study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 14, 2017

First Posted

February 15, 2018

Study Start

October 21, 2017

Primary Completion

January 16, 2018

Study Completion

January 16, 2018

Last Updated

August 28, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations