A Comparison of Subject-administered Romosozumab With Healthcare Provider-administered Romosozumab for Osteoporosis
A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label, Parallel Group Study in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis to Evaluate the Noninferiority of Subject-administered Romosozumab Via Autoinjector/Pen vs Healthcare Provider-administered Romosozumab Via Prefilled Syringe
2 other identifiers
interventional
283
3 countries
46
Brief Summary
To evaluate the noninferiority of a 6-month treatment with 210 mg romosozumab at 90 mg/mL administered subcutaneously (SC) once a month (QM) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis either by healthcare provider (HCP) administration with prefilled syringe (PFS) or by subject self-administration with autoinjector/pen (AI/Pen)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Feb 2018
46 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 6, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 14, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 11, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 8, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 10, 2020
CompletedNovember 23, 2020
October 1, 2020
1.2 years
January 30, 2018
March 24, 2020
November 5, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 6
Percent change from baseline in BMD at the lumbar spine as measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Baseline, Month 6
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip BMD at Month 6
Baseline, Month 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD at Month 6
Baseline, Month 6
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Device-Related AEs, Discontinuations Due to AEs, and Deaths
up to Month 9 (-7/+3 days)
Number of Participants Developing Anti-Romosozumab Antibodies
up to Month 9 (-7/+3 days)
Study Arms (2)
Romosozumab 210 mg QM: PFS
ACTIVE COMPARATORDuring the open-label treatment period, participants receive 210 mg romosozumab SC QM by HCP administration with PFS.
Romosozumab 210 mg QM: AI/Pen
ACTIVE COMPARATORDuring the open-label treatment period, participants receive 210 mg romosozumab SC QM by self-administration with AI/pen.
Interventions
210 mg romosozumab SC QM by HCP administration with 2 PFS
210 mg romosozumab SC QM by self-administration with 2 AI/Pens
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject has provided informed consent/assent prior to initiation of any studyspecific activities/procedures, or subject's legally acceptable representative has provided informed consent prior to any study-specific activities/procedures being initiated when the subject has any kind of condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may compromise the ability of the subject to give written informed consent.
- Postmenopausal female (postmenopausal status is defined as no vaginal bleeding or spotting for 12 consecutive months prior to screening)
- ≥ 55 to ≤ 90 years of age at the time of informed consent
- Ambulatory
- BMD T-score ≤ -2.50 at the lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck, as assessed by the central imaging vendor at the time of screening, based on DXA scans -Subject has at least 2 vertebrae in the L1-L4 region evaluable by DXA, as assessed by the principal investigator or designee
- Subject has at least 1 hip evaluable by DXA, as assessed by the principal investigator or designee
- Subject has history of fragility (ie, osteoporosis-related fracture) or subject meets at least 2 of the following clinical risk factors for fracture
- ≥ 70 years of age at the time of informed consent
- BMD T-score ≤ -3.00 at the lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck, as assessed by the central imaging vendor at the time of screening, based on DXA scans
- current smoker
- consumption of ≥ 3 glasses of alcohol a day
- parental history of fragility (ie, osteoporosis-related) fracture
- body weight ≤ 125 pounds/56 kilogram
- Ability to follow and understand instructions and the ability to self-inject, per investigator judgement
You may not qualify if:
- History of osteonecrosis of the jaw and/or atypical femoral fracture
- History of metabolic or bone disease (except osteoporosis) that may interfere with the interpretation of the results, such as sclerosteosis, Paget's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, osteomalacia, osteogenesis imperfecta, osteopetrosis, ankylosing spondylitis, Cushing's disease, hyperprolactinemia, and malabsorption syndrome
- Subject with reported history of hearing loss associated with cranial nerve VIII compression due to excessive bone growth (eg, as seen in conditions such as Paget's disease, sclerosteosis and osteopetrosis)
- Vitamin D insufficiency \[defined as serum 25 (OH) vitamin D levels \< 20 ng/mL\], as determined by the central laboratory. Vitamin D repletion will be permitted a nd subjects may be rescreened
- Current hyperthyroidism (unless well controlled on stable antithyroid therapy) by subject report or by chart review, per principal investigator evaluation
- Current clinical hypothyroidism (unless well controlled on stable thyroid replacement therapy) by subject report or by chart review, per principal investigator evaluation normal range, per subject medical history. Uncontrolled hyperparathyroidism is defined as: parathyroid hormone (PTH) outside the normal range in subjects with concurrent hypercalcemia; or PTH values \> 20% above the upper limit of normal (ULN) in normocalcemic subjects.
- Current hyper- or hypocalcemia, defined as albumin-adjusted serum calcium outside the normal range, as assessed by the central laboratory. Serum calcium levels may be retested once in case of an elevated serum calcium level within 1.1x the ULN as assessed by the central laboratory
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Amgenlead
Study Sites (46)
Research Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35205, United States
Research Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
Research Site
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801, United States
Research Site
Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 35406, United States
Research Site
Chandler, Arizona, 85224, United States
Research Site
Mesa, Arizona, 85213, United States
Research Site
Cypress, California, 90630, United States
Research Site
Fullerton, California, 92835, United States
Research Site
Glendale, California, 91206, United States
Research Site
Laguna Hills, California, 92653, United States
Research Site
Santa Maria, California, 93454, United States
Research Site
Tustin, California, 92780, United States
Research Site
Denver, Colorado, 80230, United States
Research Site
Golden, Colorado, 80401, United States
Research Site
Delray Beach, Florida, 33446, United States
Research Site
South Miami, Florida, 33143, United States
Research Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30319, United States
Research Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342, United States
Research Site
Bridgeton, Missouri, 63044, United States
Research Site
Springfield, Missouri, 65802, United States
Research Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89148, United States
Research Site
Great Neck, New York, 11021, United States
Research Site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204, United States
Research Site
Fargo, North Dakota, 58103, United States
Research Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242, United States
Research Site
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635, United States
Research Site
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, 19610, United States
Research Site
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303, United States
Research Site
Summerville, South Carolina, 29486, United States
Research Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78209, United States
Research Site
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84107, United States
Research Site
Chesapeake, Virginia, 23320, United States
Research Site
Danville, Virginia, 24541, United States
Research Site
Renton, Washington, 98057, United States
Research Site
Franklin, Wisconsin, 53132, United States
Research Site
Bialystok, 15-351, Poland
Research Site
Lodz, 90-558, Poland
Research Site
Świdnik, 21-040, Poland
Research Site
Warsaw, 01-192, Poland
Research Site
Chorley, PR7 7NA, United Kingdom
Research Site
Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, United Kingdom
Research Site
Liverpool, L22 0LG, United Kingdom
Research Site
London, DA14 6LT, United Kingdom
Research Site
Manchester, M15 6SX, United Kingdom
Research Site
Northwood, HA6 2RN, United Kingdom
Research Site
Romford, RM1 3PJ, United Kingdom
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Amgen Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
MD
Amgen
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- This is an open-label study; blinding procedures are not applicable.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 30, 2018
First Posted
February 14, 2018
Study Start
February 6, 2018
Primary Completion
April 11, 2019
Study Completion
January 8, 2020
Last Updated
November 23, 2020
Results First Posted
April 10, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- Data sharing requests relating to this study will be considered beginning 18 months after the study has ended and either 1) the product and indication (or other new use) have been granted marketing authorization in both the US and Europe or 2) clinical development for the product and/or indication discontinues and the data will not be submitted to regulatory authorities. There is no end date for eligibility to submit a data sharing request for this study.
- Access Criteria
- Qualified researchers may submit a request containing the research objectives, the Amgen product(s) and Amgen study/studies in scope, endpoints/outcomes of interest, statistical analysis plan, data requirements, publication plan, and qualifications of the researcher(s). In general, Amgen does not grant external requests for individual patient data for the purpose of re-evaluating safety and efficacy issues already addressed in the product labelling. Requests are reviewed by a committee of internal advisors, and if not approved, may be further arbitrated by a Data Sharing Independent Review Panel. Upon approval, information necessary to address the research question will be provided under the terms of a data sharing agreement. This may include anonymized individual patient data and/or available supporting documents, containing fragments of analysis code where provided in analysis specifications. Further details are available at the link below.
De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request.