NCT03431857

Brief Summary

This study is a Post Market Clinical Follow-up study to fulfill the post market surveillance requirements. The data collected from this study will serve the purpose of confirming safety and performance of the TESS Shoulder System.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
106

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2010

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
2 countries

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 20, 2010

Completed
5.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2015

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 29, 2018

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 13, 2018

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2019

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 19, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

October 19, 2021

Status Verified

September 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

5.2 years

First QC Date

January 29, 2018

Results QC Date

August 3, 2021

Last Update Submit

September 21, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Shoulder arthroplastyMedical deviceShoulder prosthesisPerformance

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Constant Shoulder Score

    The Constant Murley score is a multi-item scale assessing the level of pain and the ability to carry out the normal daily activities of the patient. The test is divided into four subscales: pain (0-15 points), activities of daily living (0-20 points), strength (0-25 points) and range of motion: forward elevation, external rotation, abduction and internal rotation of the shoulder (0-40 points). The results are here reported as final score, which ranges from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the worst and 100 the best shoulder function.

    Pre-operative, 5 years follow-up

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Active Anterior Elevation

    Pre-operative, 5 years follow-up

  • Active Lateral Elevation

    Pre-operative, 5 years follow-up

  • Active External Rotation RE1

    Pre-operative, 5 years follow-up

  • Active External Rotation RE2

    Pre-operative, 5 years follow-up

  • Passive Elevation

    Pre-operative, 5 years follow-up

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

TESS V2 Prosthesis

Single study patient cohort, including 106 patients who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria and who received the TESS V2 shoulder prosthesis.

Device: TESS V2

Interventions

TESS V2DEVICE

Patients requiring the TESS V2 prosthesis.

TESS V2 Prosthesis

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Patients in need of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (primary or revision) who receive the TESS V2 and who meet all of the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria.

You may qualify if:

  • Except in special cases, the "anatomic" type is indicated for:
  • Centered osteoarthritis of the shoulder
  • Humeral head fractures
  • Rheumatoid arthritis (with intact rotator cuff)
  • Avascular necrosis of the humeral head
  • Except in special cases, the "reversed" type is indicated for:
  • Offset osteoarthritis of the shoulder
  • Massive and non-repairable rotator cuff tears
  • Rheumatoid arthritis (with degenerative rotator cuff)
  • Revision in cases of:
  • Replacement of an "anatomic" prosthesis with a "reversed" prosthesis
  • Conversion of a hemi-arthroplasty into a total arthroplasty
  • Increasing the size of the stem (length and/or diameter)
  • Replacing a glenoid prosthesis
  • Replacing a competitor's prosthesis
  • +3 more criteria

You may not qualify if:

  • Local or systemic infections.
  • Severe muscular, neurological, or vascular deficiency of the affected joint.
  • Bone destruction or poor bone quality liable to affect the stability of the implant (Paget's disease, osteoporosis, etc.)
  • Cases where the corolla cannot be two-thirds covered with bone stock and including the stem/corolla junction.
  • Any concomitant complaint likely to affect the functioning of the implant.
  • Allergy to any of the implant components.
  • Local bone tumors.
  • Patient over 18 under law supervision

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Orthokliniek Waasland

Sint-Niklaas, 9100, Belgium

Location

Institut Calot

Berck, 59, France

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Fractures, BoneArthritis, RheumatoidOsteonecrosisRotator Cuff Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wounds and InjuriesArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic DiseasesConnective Tissue DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System DiseasesBone DiseasesNecrosisPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsRuptureShoulder InjuriesTendon Injuries

Results Point of Contact

Title
Emilie Rohmer, Clinical Ops manager
Organization
Zimmer Biomet

Study Officials

  • Paola Vivoda

    Zimmer Biomet

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
OTHER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2018

First Posted

February 13, 2018

Study Start

October 20, 2010

Primary Completion

December 31, 2015

Study Completion

December 31, 2019

Last Updated

October 19, 2021

Results First Posted

October 19, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-09

Locations