Arcos Revision Stem: Evaluation of Clinical Performance
1 other identifier
observational
74
4 countries
5
Brief Summary
The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of the Arcos Revision Stem system, determine the stability of the implants, and evaluate any relationship between Paprosky bone defect level and the success of the Arcos Stem.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Feb 2013
Longer than P75 for all trials
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 19, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 29, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 14, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 14, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 20, 2025
CompletedJanuary 20, 2025
November 1, 2024
8.4 years
March 19, 2013
March 8, 2024
November 28, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Survivorship
The primary endpoint for this study was implant survival at 5 years post surgery and is presented by the number of cases with the implants unrevised
5 year post surgery
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Radiographic Evaluation
6 weeks, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years Post Surgery
EQ5D
Preop, 6 Weeks, 1 Year, 3 Years and 5 Years post surgery
Oxford Hip Score
Preop, 6 weeks, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years post surgery
Harris Hip Score
Preop, 6 Weeks, 1 Year, 3 Years and 5 Years post surgery
Study Arms (1)
With Bonemaster HA
100 patients using Arcos Revision Stem System with BoneMaster Hydroxyapatite
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
The study population will include patients who had a revision to a total hip replacement using the Arcos Revision Stem Hip System.
You may qualify if:
- Noninflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis
- Rheumatoid arthritis
- Correction of functional deformity
- Treatment of non-union, femoral neck fracture, and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with head involvement, unmanageable using other techniques.
- Revision of previously failed total hip arthroplasty.
- The Arcos™ Modular Femoral Revision System hip components are single-use implants, intended for uncemented use only.
- Only subjects who have received or have already been scheduled to receive hip surgery with the Arcos Revision Stem System will be included in this outcomes study.
- No age limit, however, the patient must have reached full skeletal maturity.
- Willing to return for follow up evaluation.
You may not qualify if:
- Absolute contraindications include: active infection, sepsis, and osteomyelitis.
- Relative contraindications include:
- Uncooperative patient or patient with neurologic disorders who are incapable of following directions
- Osteoporosis
- Metabolic disorders which may impair bone formation
- Osteomalacia
- Distant foci of infections which may spread to the implant site
- Rapid joint destruction, marked bone loss or bone resorption apparent on roentgenogram
- Vascular insufficiency, muscular atrophy, or neuromuscular disease.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Zimmer Biometlead
Study Sites (5)
Turku University Hospital
Turku, Finland
Hospital Universitari Mutua
Barcelona, Spain
Uddevalla Hospital
Uddevalla, Sweden
Hinchingbrooke Hosptial
Cambridge, United Kingdom
NHS - Sheffield Teaching Hospital
Sheffield, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The study was initially set up to collect data within two study arms (100 with BoneMaster HA and 100 without BoneMaster HA) globally including up to ten sites. However, the study only ended up enrolling 74 cases with BoneMaster in EMEA across 5 study sites.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Linda Meijer
- Organization
- Zimmer Biomet
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Hassan Achakri
Zimmer Biomet
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 19, 2013
First Posted
March 29, 2013
Study Start
February 1, 2013
Primary Completion
June 14, 2021
Study Completion
June 14, 2021
Last Updated
January 20, 2025
Results First Posted
January 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-11