Comparison of Short-term Efficacy and Long-term Prognosis for Reduction Surgery and Radical Resection in Almost-cCR Rectal Cancer Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
477
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is evaluate the effect of two different surgical treatment on lower rectal cancer after almost clinical complete response(almost-cCR). All almost clinical complete response(almost-cCRs) were entered into two groups randomly. The estimated sample size of the minimal operation group was 221, and 221 in the Mile's group. Three years' progression-free survival(PFS) and overall survival(OS) were compared.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Jan 2018
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 13, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 13, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2022
CompletedFebruary 13, 2018
December 1, 2017
2 years
January 13, 2018
February 10, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
PFS
The progression-free survival of 3 years
three years
OS
3 years of overall survival time
three years
Secondary Outcomes (7)
carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA)
every 3 months,for 2 years
carbohydrate antigen 19-9(CA-199)
every 3 months,for 2 years
International Index of Erectile Function-15
every 3 months ,for 2 years
International prostate symptom score
every 3 months ,for 2 years
Female sexual function index
every 3 months,for 2 years
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
transanal surgery
EXPERIMENTALTo ensure the complete cutting edge with no residual tumor, the tumor with corresponding mesorectal excision was removed by the distance edge of 1cm. The intestinal wall was sutured to ensure the integrity of the bowel.
Miles surgery
PLACEBO COMPARATORAccording to the total mesorectal excision(TME) principle, complete mesorectum, lymph node and the anus was excised. A sigmoid colostomy was finally performed.
Interventions
Transanal surgery could Preserve anus to reduce trauma and improve the quality of life
Miles surgery cut off the anus, enlarge the trauma and reduce the quality of life.
After preoperative radiochemotherapy, two cycles of XELOX were given at the interval of waiting operation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Histology is confirmed as rectal adenocarcinoma.
- to 75 years old.
- Preoperative staging is lower than clinical stage primary tumor grade 3, regional lymph node grade 1, and metastasis was grade 0(cT3cN1M0).
- The anus couldn't be retained after TME.
- Almost-cCR or cCR recurrence during observation.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients were unable to tolerate the operation.
- Preoperative stage: T4b or progress during the treatment.
- HIV infection stage or chronic hepatitis B.
- Active clinical severe infections.
- Evil liquid state or decompensation of organ function.
- Other malignant tumor history in five years.
- Other primary carcinoma.
- Unstable condition and incompliance of the patient
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Zhang Ruilead
Study Sites (1)
Liaoning cancer Hospital
Shenyang, Liaoning, China
Related Publications (1)
Motamedi MAK, Mak NT, Brown CJ, Raval MJ, Karimuddin AA, Giustini D, Phang PT. Local versus radical surgery for early rectal cancer with or without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 13;6(6):CD002198. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002198.pub3.
PMID: 37310167DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
peirong ding, doctor
Sun Yat-sen University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
ji zhu, doctor
Fudan University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
zhenning wang, doctor
First Hospital of China Medical University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
hong zhang, doctor
Shengjing Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
yu han, doctor
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
zhaocheng chi, doctor
Jilin Provincial Tumor Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
quan wang, doctor
The First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
ge liu, doctor
The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
hang lu, doctor
Jinzhou Medical University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
zheng liu, doctor
Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
- STUDY DIRECTOR
rui Zhang, doctor
Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of colorectal surgery,clinical professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 13, 2018
First Posted
February 13, 2018
Study Start
January 1, 2018
Primary Completion
January 1, 2020
Study Completion
December 31, 2022
Last Updated
February 13, 2018
Record last verified: 2017-12