NCT03428282

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of two different audiovisual distraction techniques (Audio Video eyeglasses "VR BOX"/ Tablet) in the management of anxious pediatric patients during inferior alveolar nerve block Group A (Control group): IAN will be administrated with basic behavior guidance techniques and without using any type of distraction aids. Group B: IAN will be administrated with using AV eyeglasses "VR BOX" and wireless headphone. Group C: IAN will be administrated with using tablet device and wireless headphone All of the children who experienced an inferior alveolar block with/without distraction will be assessed by using a combination of measures: Wong-Baker FACES (self-report), pulse rate (physiological) and behavior (using FLACC behavior rating scale "external evaluator

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
102

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 15, 2017

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 26, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 9, 2018

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 10, 2018

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 15, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

July 30, 2018

Status Verified

July 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

December 26, 2017

Last Update Submit

July 27, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Pain levels

    using self-reported Wong-Baker FACES pain scale with 0 indicating 'no pain' and five indicating 'worst pain'.

    five minutes following the inferior alveolar nerve block injection.

  • Anxiety levels

    This will be evaluated using the Face-Legs-Activity-Cry-Consolability (FLACC) scale employing an external evaluator in which all of the body responses will be recorded once the needle penetrate the oral tissue. (0 low anxiety and pain level - 10 high anxiety and pain level)

    Within the first minute of injecting the needle into the oral mucosa (oral tissues).

  • Change in physiological pulse rate

    using Finger Pulse Oximeter

    (1) five minutes after the patient is seated comfortably on the dental chair, (2) five minutes following the injection of the anesthetic drug

Study Arms (3)

VR Box

EXPERIMENTAL

Inferior alveolar nerve block will be performed with the aid of VR box as a means of distracting patients' attention.

Procedure: VR Box

Tablet device

EXPERIMENTAL

Inferior alveolar nerve block will be performed with the aid of a tablet device as a means of distracting patients' attention.

Procedure: Tablet Device

Anesthesia

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Inferior alveolar nerve block will be performed in the normal manner without any specific intervention to distract patients' attention. Classic anesthesia will be applied.

Drug: Anesthesia

Interventions

VR BoxPROCEDURE

Distraction will be made during the injection of the drug using this method.

Also known as: Virtual Reality Eyeglasses
VR Box
Tablet DevicePROCEDURE

Distraction will be made during the injection of the drug using this method

Tablet device

Anesthesia will be obtained by injecting the drug into the oral mucosa before performing the dental treatment.

Anesthesia

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Years - 10 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • age between 6 and 10 years.
  • no previous dental experience.
  • definitely positive or positive ratings of Frank scale.
  • Need of IAN block for any dental treatment.

You may not qualify if:

  • previous dental experience
  • systematic or mental disorders.
  • definitely negative or negative ratings of Frankel scale
  • Any contraindication for regional anesthesia

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Peadodontics, University of Damascus Dental School

Damascus, DM20AM18, Syria

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Madhok M, Teele M. Evaluation of nonpharmacologic methods of pain and anxiety management for laceration repair in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatrics. 2006 Sep;118(3):1321; author reply 1321-2. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1351. No abstract available.

    PMID: 16951038BACKGROUND
  • Wang ZX, Sun LH, Chen AP. The efficacy of non-pharmacological methods of pain management in school-age children receiving venepuncture in a paediatric department: a randomized controlled trial of audiovisual distraction and routine psychological intervention. Swiss Med Wkly. 2008 Oct 4;138(39-40):579-84. doi: 10.4414/smw.2008.12224.

    PMID: 18853287BACKGROUND
  • Al-Namankany A, Petrie A, Ashley P. Video modelling and reducing anxiety related to dental injections - a randomised clinical trial. Br Dent J. 2014 Jun;216(12):675-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.497.

    PMID: 24970519BACKGROUND
  • El-Sharkawi HF, El-Housseiny AA, Aly AM. Effectiveness of new distraction technique on pain associated with injection of local anesthesia for children. Pediatr Dent. 2012 Mar-Apr;34(2):e35-8.

    PMID: 22583875BACKGROUND
  • Hoge MA, Howard MR, Wallace DP, Allen KD. Use of video eyewear to manage distress in children during restorative dental treatment. Pediatr Dent. 2012 Sep-Oct;34(5):378-82.

    PMID: 23211912BACKGROUND
  • Fakhruddin KS, Hisham EB, Gorduysus MO. Effectiveness of audiovisual distraction eyewear and computerized delivery of anesthesia during pulp therapy of primary molars in phobic child patients. Eur J Dent. 2015 Oct-Dec;9(4):470-475. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.172637.

    PMID: 26929683BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Anesthesia

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Study Officials

  • Mohammed Nour Al-Halabi, DDS

    MSc student in Pedodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Zuhair AlNerabieah, DDS

    MSc student in Pedodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Syria

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Nada Bshara, MD MSc Phd

    Associate Professor of Pedodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Syria

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 26, 2017

First Posted

February 9, 2018

Study Start

May 15, 2017

Primary Completion

February 10, 2018

Study Completion

July 15, 2018

Last Updated

July 30, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations