NCT03597087

Brief Summary

The investigators compare the recurrence rate difference between two years after transurethral resection of the bladder tumor according to the method of anesthesia. Anesthetic methods are general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia. Assessment of recurrence is assessed by bladder endoscopy, CT, and pathological examination of surgical specimens.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
289

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 2, 2018

Completed
17 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 19, 2018

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 24, 2018

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2021

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

July 24, 2018

Status Verified

July 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

July 2, 2018

Last Update Submit

July 13, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Anesthesia, Bladder cancer, Recurrence rate, Transurethral resection of bladder mass

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • 2-year recurrence-free survival rate

    The criteria for recurrence-free survival and recurrence of bladder cancer for 2 years postoperatively are based on pathological histology. If the recurrence is suspected in the radiological examination but pathological histological examination is difficult, the reference is based on the day of the imaging examination suspected of recurrence.

    Follow up every 3 months until 2 years after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • 2-year progression-free survival

    Follow up every 3 months until 2 years after surgery

Study Arms (2)

General anesthesia

EXPERIMENTAL

Group of general anesthesia before transurethral resection of the bladder tumor anesthesia: propopol

Procedure: Anesthesia before transurethral resection of the bladder tumorDrug: Anesthesia

Spinal anesthesia

EXPERIMENTAL

Group of spinal anesthesia before transurethral resection of the bladder tumor anesthesia: bupibacaine

Procedure: Anesthesia before transurethral resection of the bladder tumorDrug: Anesthesia

Interventions

General anaesthesia or general anesthesia (see spelling differences) is a medically induced coma with loss of protective reflexes, resulting from the administration of one or more general anaesthetic agents. Spinal anaesthesia is a form of regional anaesthesia involving the injection of a local anaesthetic into the subarachnoid space, generally through a fine needle

General anesthesiaSpinal anesthesia

General anaesthesia : propopol Spinal anaesthesia : bupibacaine

General anesthesiaSpinal anesthesia

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years old or older
  • Patients with suspected Ta / T1 non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
  • Patients who were not previously treated with other cancers
  • Normal range creatinine, AST, ALT patients
  • Patients with both spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with urinary tract carcinoma not invading the renal pelvis, ureter or urethra
  • Patients with cancer other than bladder cancer or a history of treatment
  • Patients with clinical evidence of muscle-invasive bladder cancer
  • Patients taking immunosuppressive drugs and immunosuppressive drugs

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Seoul National University Hospital

Seoul, 110-744, South Korea

Location

Related Publications (24)

  • Herr HW, Faulkner JR, Grossman HB, Natale RB, deVere White R, Sarosdy MF, Crawford ED. Surgical factors influence bladder cancer outcomes: a cooperative group report. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jul 15;22(14):2781-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.11.024. Epub 2004 Jun 15.

  • Christodouleas JP, Baumann BC, He J, Hwang WT, Tucker KN, Bekelman JE, Tangen CM, Lerner SP, Guzzo TJ, Malkowicz SB, Herr H. Optimizing bladder cancer locoregional failure risk stratification after radical cystectomy using SWOG 8710. Cancer. 2014 Apr 15;120(8):1272-80. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28544. Epub 2014 Jan 3.

  • Witjes JA, Comperat E, Cowan NC, De Santis M, Gakis G, Lebret T, Ribal MJ, Van der Heijden AG, Sherif A; European Association of Urology. EAU guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer: summary of the 2013 guidelines. Eur Urol. 2014 Apr;65(4):778-92. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.046. Epub 2013 Dec 12.

  • Pollack A, Zagars GK, Cole CJ, Dinney CP, Swanson DA, Grossman HB. The relationship of local control to distant metastasis in muscle invasive bladder cancer. J Urol. 1995 Dec;154(6):2059-63; discussion 2063-4.

  • Jensen JB, Ulhoi BP, Jensen KM. Extended versus limited lymph node dissection in radical cystectomy: impact on recurrence pattern and survival. Int J Urol. 2012 Jan;19(1):39-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02887.x. Epub 2011 Nov 3.

  • Zaghloul MS, Awwad HK, Akoush HH, Omar S, Soliman O, el Attar I. Postoperative radiotherapy of carcinoma in bilharzial bladder: improved disease free survival through improving local control. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1992;23(3):511-7. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(92)90005-3.

  • Lawton CA, Michalski J, El-Naqa I, Buyyounouski MK, Lee WR, Menard C, O'Meara E, Rosenthal SA, Ritter M, Seider M. RTOG GU Radiation oncology specialists reach consensus on pelvic lymph node volumes for high-risk prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Jun 1;74(2):383-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.002. Epub 2008 Oct 22.

  • Baumann BC, Guzzo TJ, He J, Keefe SM, Tucker K, Bekelman JE, Hwang WT, Vaughn DJ, Malkowicz SB, Christodouleas JP. A novel risk stratification to predict local-regional failures in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder after radical cystectomy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Jan 1;85(1):81-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.03.007. Epub 2012 Apr 28.

  • Baumann BC, Guzzo TJ, He J, Vaughn DJ, Keefe SM, Vapiwala N, Deville C, Bekelman JE, Tucker K, Hwang WT, Malkowicz SB, Christodouleas JP. Bladder cancer patterns of pelvic failure: implications for adjuvant radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Feb 1;85(2):363-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.03.061. Epub 2012 May 30.

  • Ku JH, Kim M, Jeong CW, Kwak C, Kim HH. Risk prediction models of locoregional failure after radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma: external validation in a cohort of korean patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Aug 1;89(5):1032-1037. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.04.049. Epub 2014 Jul 8.

  • Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. Epub 2014 Oct 9.

  • Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. Epub 2015 Feb 4.

  • Babjuk M, Burger M, Comperat E, Palou J, Roupret M, van Rhijn B, Shariat S, Sylvester R, Zigeuner R, Gontero P, Mostafid H. Reply to Harry Herr's Letter to the Editor re: Marko Babjuk, Andreas Bohle, Maximilian Burger, et al. EAU Guidelines on Non-muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Update 2016. Eur Urol 2017;71:447-61. Eur Urol. 2017 Jun;71(6):e173-e174. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.11.029. Epub 2016 Dec 7. No abstract available.

  • Burger M, Catto JW, Dalbagni G, Grossman HB, Herr H, Karakiewicz P, Kassouf W, Kiemeney LA, La Vecchia C, Shariat S, Lotan Y. Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2013 Feb;63(2):234-41. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.033. Epub 2012 Jul 25.

  • Kamat AM, Witjes JA, Brausi M, Soloway M, Lamm D, Persad R, Buckley R, Bohle A, Colombel M, Palou J. Defining and treating the spectrum of intermediate risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. J Urol. 2014 Aug;192(2):305-15. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.2573. Epub 2014 Mar 25.

  • Hall MC, Chang SS, Dalbagni G, Pruthi RS, Seigne JD, Skinner EC, Wolf JS Jr, Schellhammer PF. Guideline for the management of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (stages Ta, T1, and Tis): 2007 update. J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2314-30. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.003. No abstract available.

  • Morales A, Eidinger D, Bruce AW. Intracavitary Bacillus Calmette-Guerin in the treatment of superficial bladder tumors. J Urol. 1976 Aug;116(2):180-3. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)58737-6.

  • Balkwill F, Mantovani A. Inflammation and cancer: back to Virchow? Lancet. 2001 Feb 17;357(9255):539-45. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04046-0.

  • Grivennikov SI, Greten FR, Karin M. Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell. 2010 Mar 19;140(6):883-99. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.025.

  • Kim HS, Ku JH. Systemic Inflammatory Response Based on Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Prognostic Marker in Bladder Cancer. Dis Markers. 2016;2016:8345286. doi: 10.1155/2016/8345286. Epub 2016 Jan 5.

  • Crumley AB, McMillan DC, McKernan M, Going JJ, Shearer CJ, Stuart RC. An elevated C-reactive protein concentration, prior to surgery, predicts poor cancer-specific survival in patients undergoing resection for gastro-oesophageal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006 Jun 5;94(11):1568-71. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603150.

  • Dutta S, Crumley AB, Fullarton GM, Horgan PG, McMillan DC. Comparison of the prognostic value of tumour and patient related factors in patients undergoing potentially curative resection of gastric cancer. Am J Surg. 2012 Sep;204(3):294-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.10.015. Epub 2012 Mar 22.

  • Kweon TD, Lee KY. Spinal anesthesia is associated with lower recurrence rates after resection of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Apr;7(2):283-286. doi: 10.21037/tau.2018.03.13. No abstract available.

  • Han JH, Yuk HD, Jeong SH, Jeong CW, Kwak C, Kim JT, Ku JH. Anesthetic approaches and 2-year recurrence rates in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a randomized clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Dec 31:rapm-2024-105949. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105949. Online ahead of print.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

Interventions

Anesthesia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urologic NeoplasmsUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesUrinary Bladder DiseasesUrologic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Study Officials

  • Jin Tae Kim, PhD

    Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Seoul National University Hospital

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Ja Hyeon Ku, PhD

    Professor, Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Hyeong Dong Yuk, MD

    Clinical fellow, Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Song Hee Kim, Bacheolor

    Researcher, Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Jae Hyun Jung, MD

    Clinical fellow, Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Jung Hoon Lee, MD

    Clinical fellow, Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Hyeong Dong Yuk, MD

CONTACT

Song Hee Kim, Bacheolo

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
Using a web site, and creating a randomized list at Sealedenvalop.com. Patients are randomly assigned to receive an anesthetic consent, and no masking is performed.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: After randomization, they were divided into two parallel groups 289 patients were randomly assigned to a spinal anesthesia group and a general anesthesia group 1: 1.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor, MD., PHD.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 2, 2018

First Posted

July 24, 2018

Study Start

July 19, 2018

Primary Completion

July 1, 2021

Study Completion

December 31, 2022

Last Updated

July 24, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations